your blind support for an idiot should embarrass you. iVegas » 01 May 2024, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ Your TDS is embarrassing you. You will never make coherent points during a TDS episode. It's impossible.
Vegas » 01 May 2024, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ Your TDS is embarrassing you. You will never make coherent points during a TDS episode. It's impossible.
I thought we were ****** grabbers.....make up your mind.jerrab » 01 May 2024, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ you can't show where I am wrong so you use the generic tds syndrome response.
but all trump supporters are puppy shooters. it is the maga way.
DeezerShoove » 01 May 2024, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑ I quit watching "the news" many years ago.
For example:
In my workshop, I could have in the background broadcast TV (1970's game shows)
while doing chores I don't like.
Same question: Guess which is more rewarding?![]()
The current brainwashing doesn't suit me either. I have a continuing conundrum.
Intellectually, I know society needs cons and libs to keep an eye on **** from contrasting viewpoints.
Seems like libs always acted like they were the rebels and sought change from establishment.
Now they have been usurped in some perverse way to openly rebel against people that fight the establishment.
The libs are the establishment . . . apparently. Weird.
you can chew gum and walk at the same time? you can live in a house and drive a car.RebelGator » 01 May 2024, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ I thought we were ****** grabbers.....make up your mind.
jerrab » 01 May 2024, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ you can't show where I am wrong so you use the generic tds syndrome response.
but all trump supporters are puppy shooters. it is the maga way.
Are all Biden supporters on cocaine like Hunter?jerrab » 01 May 2024, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ you can't show where I am wrong so you use the generic tds syndrome response.
but all trump supporters are puppy shooters. it is the maga way.
I would never shoot a puppy.....jerrab » 01 May 2024, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑
you can grab ****** after you get home from shooting poor puppies.
Then your part of the problem.Vegas » 01 May 2024, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't support Trump. Another false assumption on your part.
Not a true substitute for the real thing but went on discogs and purchased two live DVD's of Rush. Not the same by any means but its as close as I will get. Was at a punk rock show in Salt Lake City earlier this month and there was this older guy wearing a very old Lynard Skynard T-shirt. Your posts made me think of this.*rippy38 » 30 Apr 2024, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I found something a few weeks back that made me think of a conversation we had months ago on the .org site.
Check this out.
Note the row and seat... and the price!
LOL
Vegas » 01 May 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You made a claim, but didn't support it. You just accused Trump of something without any evidence, then that was that.
So, yes. I am going to refer to TDS. If the shoe fits.
jerrab » 01 May 2024, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ accused of him of saying they should not knee? which is free speech .I will post a video later.
They’re inching closerVegas » 30 Apr 2024, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't know if Jews ever tried to pull that **** here in America, but they were successful in other countries. I wouldn't be surprised if they have tried...or are even still trying.
My question is how do some nations select what should be free speech and what shouldn't? Yes, sometimes free speech hurts. I get that. For example, NAMBLA the group that @Bidencrimefamily , @R. Suave (he will see it when he returns), and many other lefties belong to, are protected under the 1st amendment to distribute their literature. The same lit that provides instructions on how to groom little boys. Groups like this are evil. But they are protected under the 1st amendment like every one else.
Eventually, the progressives will have 100% control of this country. It's already starting. So my question to you progressives is when you deconstruct the 1st amendment to fit your disgusting mentality, what criteria will you be using to select what is free speech and what isn't?
he told the nfl to fire players who exercising their right to free speech. if a democrat said that you would be all over him. he put pressure on the nfl so changing the law was not necessary, however dictator trump would abolish the right to free speech.Vegas » 01 May 2024, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ No. What you said to me. You responded to the question in the OP with "so you mean Trump then."
That is a TDS statement. Not even worthy of justification.
And unless Trump made an attempt to make kneeling illegal, your concern remains invalid.
Still can't accept the fact that Trump asked NFL Owners to enforce their "No Political Displays Rule"...but he in no way asked that the players be arrested and thrown in prison.jerrab » 01 May 2024, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ accused of him of saying they should not knee? which is free speech .I will post a video later.

the nfl is a private business it decides it's own policies. denying the holocaust is one thing but instigating violence is another. go to europe and complain there.GHETTOBLASTER » 02 May 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Still can't accept the fact that Trump asked NFL Owners to enforce their "No Political Displays Rule"...but he in no way asked that the players be arrested and thrown in prison.
On the other hand YOU ARE THE TOTALITARIAN / USA HATING PIECE OF **** TRAITOR who advocates people being imprisoned for disagreeing with the Holocaust Narrative.
jerrab » 02 May 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ he told the nfl to fire players who exercising their right to free speech. if a democrat said that you would be all over him. he put pressure on the nfl so changing the law was not necessary, however dictator trump would abolish the right to free speech.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/ ... m-protests
LowIQTrash » 01 May 2024, 10:38 pm » wrote: ↑ They’re inching closer
https://x.com/aipac/status/1785777302393045482?s=46