Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 15 May 2024, 1:54 am » wrote: ↑

15 May 2024, 1:54 am

YOU would love it. Don't assume that everyone else would. I lived in a high rise luxury apartment in St Petersburg that I quite enjoyed. There were parks and sanctuaries quite nearby, and I could get sushi, italian, good steak, several sports bars - you name it, all in walking distance. A natural grocer was a short car trip from my door. There were beautiful grounds and a very clean swimming pool. And yes - my apartment was small. But not as small as the one in San Francisco. 

I don't need anyone to die for my life to work. I had a four bedroom with a pool and a spa in Vegas, a three bedroom in Myrtle Beach. I currently live in a three bedroom way out in the woods, on account of the recent attempt on my life by the federal government. I'm hunkered down with chickens and relationships with local farmers and perfectly comfortable. And let's not step over the fact that the crowd directing the attempt on my life sees things your way regarding population.

You gave me the same talk just a couple posts back and I had to correct your thinking about that with a published study that shows most Americans DO yearn for the same things that I do.
My future model does not force you to give up Urban life..but it will make finding parking spots right next to the Opera House and the Ball Parks much easier.
You keep wasting key strokes talking about all the people who need to die in order for my vision to work and I have reached the point where I'll just let you continue to ramble on with that falsehood.
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 15 May 2024, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

15 May 2024, 6:12 am

You gave me the same talk just a couple posts back and I had to correct your thinking about that with a published study that shows most Americans DO yearn for the same things that I do.

So what? Just make those Americans the ones we get rid of, duh. Two birds, one stone.

GHETTOBLASTER » 15 May 2024, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

15 May 2024, 6:12 am

My future model does not force you to give up Urban life..but it will make finding parking spots right next to the Opera House and the Ball Parks much easier.

No it won't. It's already easy. I don't know of any major metro areas that do not boast copious parks and great public spaces. Certainly L.A., New York, San Francisco and Las Vegas fit the bill. And small towns have nice parks, as well. There are wonderful parks in towns all over America between a thousand and a hundred thousand population, boasting public swimming pools and bicycle tracks and walking paths and such. 

GHETTOBLASTER » 15 May 2024, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

15 May 2024, 6:12 am

You keep wasting key strokes talking about all the people who need to die in order for my vision to work and I have reached the point where I'll just let you continue to ramble on with that falsehood.

YOU are the one calling for cutting the population in half. I am the one saying no to that stupidity. Let's not get this twisted - let's be big boys about it.
 

Cannonpointer » 16 May 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2024, 10:16 am

. YOU are the one calling for cutting the population in half. I am the one saying no to that stupidity. Let's not get this twisted - let's be big boys about it.

you've referred more than once to how my plan requires "killing off" half the population in just this thread alone.
it doesn't.

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 May 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2024, 10:34 am

you've referred more than once to how my plan requires "killing off" half the population in just this thread alone.
it doesn't.

No no - you're a BIG boy.

In big boy world, these bothersome units just leave the gameboard voluntarily. 
 
What was it you suggested - letting each couple have one and one third children? A Maoist policy to be sure.

You DO understand that those third of a children are all going to have special needs, yeah?
 
 

I'd rather eat off the floor of India than San Francisco


 

Cannonpointer » 16 May 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2024, 10:47 am

No no - you're a BIG boy.

In big boy world, these bothersome units just leave the gameboard voluntarily. 
 
 

Nope
In my "model" they are never born.
The Social Engineers have devised several  social trends that lessen the desire to have children.
This has been an ongoing discussion for years by now and if you can't stick to what I've been calling for ever since day one why should I waste my time playing WACK A MOLE with you..?
 

Cannonpointer » 16 May 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2024, 10:16 am

ghettoblaster said....."My future model does not force you to give up Urban life..but it will make finding parking spots right next to the Opera House and the Ball Parks much easier".

No it won't. It's already easy. I don't know of any major metro areas that do not boast copious parks and great public spaces.

https://stadiumhelp.com/lumen-field-parking-tips/
$30 to $40 for "event parking" within walking distance of the venues.
Street parking in front of businesses and in their alleys...?
The Business Owners monitor those spots and will charge whatever the market will bear.
10s of 1000s of people are forced to drive just to the outskirts of the city and then take "stadium buses" or subways instead of being able to drive right up to the ball parks.

Competition for limited resources 101      
https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/sea ... c-pricing/
 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 May 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

16 May 2024, 11:15 am

Nope
In my "model" they are never born.
The Social Engineers have devised several  social trends that lessen the desire to have children.
This has been an ongoing discussion for years by now and if you can't stick to what I've been calling for ever since day one why should I waste my time playing WACK A MOLE with you..?

I am the one playing whackamole? You have LITERALLY embraced Maosim, arguing for some "percentage" of a child per couple - 1.3 children per, you offered. 

This is what marries you to leftist elitists. 

Under that preposterous model, Mormons would be criminalized, and people who are morally opposed to birth control and abortion would be criminalized, as well. You are blithely yammering about opening Pandora's box. 

Worse, when called on THAT ****, you triumphally wave a retarded poll from the new york slimes that unscientifically insists that lots and lots of people would just LOVE to own a house (probably on the sea shore, with servants' quarters). Look, "I would like to own a house," and, "I am willing to embrace the lifestyle which comports with home ownership" are two very far-removed utterances - and that silly *** poll, which you referenced TWICE (indicating that you value it above the toilet paper it is), is meaningless to the argument which you continue to turn into a game of whackamole. 

Just stop siding with the Davos crowd, stop believing the world-of-want **** they have fed your brain, and embrace the world of plenty that I live in, son. 
 
 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 15 May 2024, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

15 May 2024, 6:12 am

You gave me the same talk just a couple posts back and I had to correct your thinking about that with a published study that shows most Americans DO yearn for the same things that I do.

Yes, yes - a new york times poll asking people about a fantasy world. This is your THIRD triumphal reference to that utterly meaningless and stupid poll. 

In their own "perfect world," **** Downsies would opt for home ownership. Lots of people who answered yes to that retarded poll are RENTERS BY CHOICE in the real world they inhabit. Who WOULDN'T "like to own a house," for **** sake? I would also like a Masters Degree, thank you very **** much - and a Cesna, while we're yapping.

GHETTOBLASTER » 15 May 2024, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

15 May 2024, 6:12 am

My future model does not force you to give up Urban life..but it will make finding parking spots right next to the Opera House and the Ball Parks much easier.

I'll keep a world filled with people and you can jack off to a world filled with cheap parking, son.

GHETTOBLASTER » 15 May 2024, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

15 May 2024, 6:12 am

You keep wasting key strokes talking about all the people who need to die in order for my vision to work and I have reached the point where I'll just let you continue to ramble on with that falsehood.

Billions of people will have to die for your retarded vision to be a reality in your brainwashed lifetime, kid.

Do the **** math.

Yammering about policies that won't produce results until the turn of next century puts you in a boat with global warners. 

 
 

Cannonpointer » 16 May 2024, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2024, 2:36 pm

Billions of people will have to die for your retarded vision to be a reality in your brainwashed lifetime, kid.

Do the **** math.

Yammering about policies that won't produce results until the turn of next century puts you in a boat with global warners.

WRONG
There is no such time limit for my model to happen.
We are already seeing the downward trend...and we are still living through "good times" [relatively speaking].
A good ole fashioned DEPRESSION would speed things up I'll bet.
Whether  it takes 60, or 160 years for a 50% reduction to take place that's insignificant in the grand scheme ..no body needs to be mass murdered to make it happen.    
 
 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 May 2024, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2024, 3:36 pm

Whether  it takes 60, or 160 years for a 50% reduction to take place 

Stop jacking about **** that might happen when you're dead. 

It's public masturbation - not a policy argument. It's global warning level ****.

Cannonpointer » 16 May 2024, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2024, 4:17 pm

Stop jacking about **** that might happen when you're dead. 

It's public masturbation - not a policy argument. It's global warning level ****.

Years ago when this topic first came up [with me as the contributor] I prefaced my remarks with some words to the effect...."I hope that after I'm dead I'll be able to take  occasional looks down upon the USA and see if any of my predictions come to pass."
If that some how hurts your feelings...well I certainly didn't mean to upset you.

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 May 2024, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2024, 4:21 pm

Years ago when this topic first came up [with me as the contributor] I prefaced my remarks with some words to the effect...."I hope that after I'm dead I'll be able to take  occasional looks down upon the USA and see if any of my predictions come to pass."
 

I hope after you're dead, God disabuses you of foolish Maoist tendencies.
 

Cannonpointer » 15 May 2024, 1:54 am » wrote: ↑

15 May 2024, 1:54 am

I currently live in a three bedroom way out in the woods, on account of the recent attempt on my life by the federal government.

Well this is newsworthy...

LowIQTrash » 17 May 2024, 1:49 am » wrote: ↑

17 May 2024, 1:49 am

Well this is newsworthy...

The vax was the attempt. I stood strong.

Cannonpointer » 17 May 2024, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2024, 12:41 pm

The vax was the attempt. I stood strong.

Was hoping for some Bourne Identity action  c:

LowIQTrash » 17 May 2024, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2024, 3:31 pm

Was hoping for some Bourne Identity action  c:

Lol - that's what I am hoping AGAINST.

I'm more Ignatius J. Reilly than Jason Bourne.  

Cannonpointer » 16 May 2024, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

16 May 2024, 4:32 pm

I hope after you're dead, God disabuses you of foolish Maoist tendencies.

CANNON, Dear suh, please restore my images NOW!!!!  
@Cannon Pointer  
 

Beakman » 17 May 2024, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2024, 8:29 pm

CANNON, Dear suh, please restore my images NOW!!!!  
@Cannon Pointer  

I have put ronjul on the issue. 

Let's see if I can do it...



I just copy pasted...
 

Cannonpointer » 17 May 2024, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑

17 May 2024, 8:33 pm

I have put ronjul on the issue. 

Let's see if I can do it...



I just copy pasted...

At the age of 65, how do you get conjobs and libtards obsessed with your peepee? Literally the common factor the posters talk about:

Mirabeau: WEEniepointer 
maineman: you should stroke your tiny cock