Huey » 04 May 2024, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Old Man, who was never I [sic] the navy, Charles Atlas is no long really a part of pop culture. Get with times, idiot. I never said was [sic] going to kick your ***, or hit you. So there is no way I would have gotten your reference.
But I also think you are lying about that. I'll see what other nuggets you will drop.
Clinging to established reasonable doubt for hundreds of generation gaps becoming current population occupying space this rotation is equal to what definition of insanity and or eternal hell's punished after death for those not paying to stay in character defined by rule of law cradle to grave?maineman » 04 May 2024, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ gibberish. data mining? what are you even talking about? WHAT was never posted on this or any forum? You're actually incoherent at this point. :loco:
Yawn.maineman » 04 May 2024, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑My reference had nothing to do with Charles Atlas hitting me, nor did I ever claim that you threatened any such thing. My reference to Charles Atlas had to do with you preening and flexing your e-muscles here... like he used todo, and like men of our ages can remember him doing. I knew my audience. It was you. I wasn't talking to Gen-Xers...I was talking to a man in his late 50's. You knew who Charles Atlas was. There was no data mining.... just a reference to a cultural figure that I KNEW both of us were aware of.
You wanted to know when we would meet face to face so that you could TELL me what a liar you claim I am. I quite calmly answered that question, telling you to catch a flight to PWM, let me know your ETA, and that I would meet you at the terminal and let you tell me whatever it was that you wanted to tell me.
Suddenly, that became not so attractive to you. I would imagine that your e-muscles looked a little bit smaller when you had to imagine them actually DOING something besides preening in front of a mirror or in front of a computer terminal screen. I have no idea...but you went from asking me for a meeting to telling me you'd let me know if and when you ever found the testicles to actually fly up to PWM and stand in front of me face too[sic] face.
We both know you'll never find the stones to come up here, so, Chuck.... go give your photo and map to your house to some other potential swinger. I ain't interested. Proud PFC
Huey » 05 May 2024, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ Yawn.
I did read the very last two words. Do you understand what Proud PFC means? Post what you think it means.
He did that because he is scared.........Huey » 04 May 2024, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ Aw, someone is data mining. Didn't you have someone banned for doing that? LMAO! Just for the record that was never posted to this forum. Or any forum.
maineman » 05 May 2024, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑ So you claim you didn't bother to read where I blew your stupid "data miner " **** out of the water?
what a ******, Chuck!
...Which is grammatically incorrect. What a surprise!Huey » 05 May 2024, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ I have no clue what you posted. But Proud PFC means Proud **** Civilian, dum dum.
maineman » 05 May 2024, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ ...Which is grammatically incorrect. What a surprise!![]()
I could imagine, since you display limited intellect, and you admit to enlisting in the Army, you could very well be proud of achieving the grade of PFC.
Although, I had given thought to the idea that it stood for Puerile Foppish Cocksucker. That also would fit nicely.
And you are a liar, obviously. You read what I posted and you know it exposes your data mining accusation as the foolish lie that is it.
Go flex for someone else, Chuck. Go piss on someone else's leg. You've outlived your usefulness from my perspective.
ta ta
Interesting. I would never even THINK that PROUD PFC stood for PROUD PROUD **** CIVILIAN. Who talks like that? Or should I have said, who who talks like that? Now...Proud Puerile Foppish Cocksucker, on the other hand? Why, that's so YOU!Huey » 05 May 2024, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑ I actually achieved the grade of E6. Really did not want E7 because it would have meant coming of [sic]the flight line and flight duties.
Gilligan, consider that another of your epic insult failures. You can leave this thread any time you lie. No one is FORCING you to post.
I see you are a typical Ring knocker coming from the military academy factory. One who has disdain for the enlisted man. Typical Naval Officer.
I'll keep that is mind. I think I will add your comments to my sig box so every one knows what an arrogant prick you are.
You say something….more whining?maineman » 05 May 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑ Interesting. I would never even THINK that PROUD PFC stood for PROUD PROUD **** CIVILIAN. Who talks like that? Or should I have said, who who talks like that? Now...Proud Puerile Foppish Cocksucker, on the other hand? Why, that's so YOU!
And I fully understand why the military has a lot of career E-6's that never quite make it to E-7. The Acey-Duecy Club always had a lot more guys than the Goat Locker. The Peter Principle is a real thing. You simply climbed up the ladder until you reached your level of incompetence.
I know no one is forcing me to post. Your stumblings are just such low-hanging fruit, I can't NOT pick them. Sorry!
And, btw, I have great respect for those enlisted personnel who deserve it. Those who insult me should expect the same in return, Chuckie.
You really are an internet macho man with YUGE e-muscles. Isn't it flex time?
YOU'RE the one who's ****, fool!Squatchman » 04 May 2024, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑ You're **** then.
Because there won't be any non peaceful solution.
Zeets2 » 05 May 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ YOU'RE the one who's ****, fool!
We're on the side of who have by far the most guns and trillions of rounds of ammo, while dickheads like you can't figure out which bathroom to use! You think you're going to start a war?
You leftist idiots can't start a lawnmower!
maineman » 05 May 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ so... you really are going to run and hide from anything I say, Chuckie?
You must be so proud proud.

I consider you my proud proud proud puppy.Huey » 05 May 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I am having a blast jerking your chain. You can't stop. Just consider me your puppet master.
You're making two rather weak assumptions.maineman » 05 May 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑ the DoD will hold with the government against the rabble. It'll be a real bloodbath.




No win situation exists evolving in space, same time, difference ancestors, here now, always changing shape in the same DNA form since conceived, each stage of body changes, each rotation of the planet, population changes ancestors arriving and departing this rotation intellectual minds promising type cast people tomorrows happen for every stereotypical behavior historically carried into current events each generation gap alive since inception of ancestral lineages became the 8 billion replacements alive now in this atmosphere acting out win win scenarios are possible when everyone agrees to disagree on specificity of adapting as displaced cradle to grave.maineman » 05 May 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑ the DoD will hold with the government against the rabble. It'll be a real bloodbath.
maineman » 05 May 2024, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ I consider you my proud proud proud puppy.
you even misquote me in your signature line! funny stuff.
what misquote? Are you like Biden and suffer from CRS? Another lie from Gilligan.maineman » 05 May 2024, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ ...Which is grammatically incorrect. What a surprise!![]()
I could imagine, since you display limited intellect, and you admit to enlisting in the Army, you could very well be proud of achieving the grade of PFC.
Although, I had given thought to the idea that it stood for Puerile Foppish Cocksucker. That also would fit nicely.
And you are a liar, obviously. You read what I posted and you know it exposes your data mining accusation as the foolish lie that is it.
Go flex for someone else, Chuck. Go piss on someone else's leg. You've outlived your usefulness from my perspective.
ta ta
1. My assumptions aren't weak. They are simply assumptions. I do assume that Biden will win in November, and I do believe that the DoD leadership will stand with the rightfully elected president and will support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. I would not begin to know what local police forces will do, but, if I had to guess, I would say the WORST thing they MIGHT do is stand down and let the military quell any uprisings on their own. I cannot imagine local police forces facing off against U.S. Military troops.Zeets2 » 05 May 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ You're making two rather weak assumptions.
One, you think Biden is going to win re-election in November, and two, you think the National Guard and the local police will open fire on the American people when there are tens of thousands who rise up against the government like so many other countries have seen if Biden wins another fraudulent election.
You think that can't happen here?