Liberal Forum

Squatchman » 06 May 2024, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 8:03 am

  The only one lying here is you doxxer.

it’s funny to see her come here and pretend to be a man   

  wait a minute 

do you think that maybe Z09 is transitioning?

no wonder she seems so confused all the time

poor little thing     

Squatchman » 06 May 2024, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 6:33 am

Patty herself.

Already been there

It was a hoax...In 1995,[139] almost three decades after the Patterson–Gimlin filming, Greg Long,[115] a technical writer for a technology firm who had a hobby of investigating and writing about Northwest mysteries, started years of interviewing people who knew Patterson, some of whom described him as a liar and a conman.

• "Marvin" (pseudonym),[140] Jerry Lee Merritt,[141] Pat Mason,[142] Glen Koelling,[143] and Bob Swanson[144] suffered financially from their dealings with him, as well as 21 small local creditors who sued Patterson via a collection agency.[145]
• Vilma Radford[146] claimed Patterson never repaid a loan made to him for a Bigfoot movie Roger was planning. Radford had corroborative evidence: a $700 promissory note "for expenses in connection with filming of 'Bigfoot: America's Abominable Snowman.'"[147] Patterson had agreed to repay her $850, plus 5 percent of any profits from the movie.
• In 1974, Bob Gimlin, with René Dahinden's financial assistance, sued DeAtley and Patterson's widow, Patricia, claiming he had not received his one-third share of the film's proceeds. He won his case in 1976.[148][149]

Legal status
 

Mrkelly » 06 May 2024, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 8:16 am

it’s funny to see her come here and pretend to be a man   

  wait a minute 

do you think that maybe Z09 is transitioning?

no wonder she seems so confused all the time

poor little thing 

It's funny to see you come here and rather than discuss the issues you try to figure out who is a man or woman.

Perhaps you should focus on an education
 

Squatchman » 06 May 2024, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 8:03 am

  The only one lying here is you doxxer.

Kinda strange how a man who is known as a con man purchased a costume (documented) and rented a camera and walked in the forest and filmed a Big Foot...

And that was almost 60 years ago....

And no one has ever done it again!

They even interviewed the man WEARING the costume.
And he ADMITTED that was him in the costume

And then along came Squatchman....

BooRadley » 06 May 2024, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 8:19 am

It's funny to see you come here and rather than discuss the issues you try to figure out who is a man or woman.

Perhaps you should focus on an education

We are not trying to figure anything out 

EVERYBODY knows that you are Z09

that’s why it cracks me up to see you call someone a liar

idiot   
 

About August 1967 (Morris recalled in a 2002 interview on Charlotte radio), he sold one of his gorilla suits to Roger Patterson, who used it in his famous hoaxed Bigfoot film on October 20 of that year. Morris informs that his suit was made in six pieces: head, body (a back-zippered fake-fur torso with arms and legs), and a pair of glove hands and latex feet. Patterson may have seen the Morris ad for gorilla suits in Amusement Business magazine, says Morris (whom I have talked with on several occasions, and whose lecture on the subject I attended at the Society of American Magicians convention in Buffalo on July 17, 2009).

Trying to recall events of over 33 years before, the man who claims he wore the suit in Patterson’s film, Bob Heironimus, described wearing a suit fashioned rather differently from Morris’ and smelling like horsehide. Morris notes that his suit—which he positively identifies from the film—was modified. The face mask was replaced, probably by one of leather such as horsehide, and stuffed breasts were added, no doubt from extra fake fur Patterson had asked to be included with his suit. The modifications were necessary to convert a gorilla costume into a more credible Bigfoot suit. Heironimus now concludes Morris indeed made the suit, which Roger Patterson later modified. Family and friends of Heironimus saw the suit in the trunk of Heironimus’ mother’s Buick in late 1967.

Mrkelly » 06 May 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 8:22 am

We are not trying to figure anything out 

EVERYBODY knows that you are Z09

that’s why it cracks me up to see you call someone a liar

idiot 

YAHTZEE!!!!!  

Mrkelly » 06 May 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 8:22 am

We are not trying to figure anything out 

EVERYBODY knows that you are Z09

that’s why it cracks me up to see you call someone a liar

idiot 

Are you really Tom Hanks?

If you believe I'm not a guy then just move on.

Why does it bother you so much?

I'm a man
You can believe anything you want
 

maineman » 06 May 2024, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 8:24 am

YAHTZEE!!!!!

Not sure what the other poster did to you but man...
It had to hurt

Squatchman » 06 May 2024, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 7:50 am

  
Watch this.

Roger Patterson failed to pay his Bigsuit wearer a promised $1,000, says Heironimus—a credible claim in light of Patterson’s repeated theft of services (some $700 in long-distance charges to a neighbor’s home; about $2,000 for printing his 1966 book, Do Abominable Snowmen of America Really Exist? ; a $700 loan; and so on and on). Patterson had a habit of ripping off people. Morris says Patterson tried to get him to send the gorilla suit on approval, but Morris demanded payment in advance, and Patterson then sent a money order. Once he had obtained and modified Bigsuit, Roger Patterson was set to perpetrate one of the most audacious hoaxes of the twentieth century.

Beekeeper » 05 May 2024, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑

05 May 2024, 4:26 pm

Hey @Squatchman  , you need to KEEP UP WITH THE FACTS!!

Your boy bye-DUMB is getting his *** KICKED with WOMEN!! Oh wait, you said they loved him or some stupid NAZI **** your handlers shoved up that *** that loves BLACK COCK!!! Looks like all that BLACK CUM clouded your "brain"!!

                   

First off, the REAL problem Democrats and Biden has....

https://twitter.com/VoteMarsha/status/1 ... e-n2173780

And THEN we get it all defined as succinctly as it gets!!

https://twitter.com/LucasFoxNews/status ... e-n2173780

And the REAL KICKER there squatty...

https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/stat ... e-n2173780

Don’t get over confident it’s gonna be a close election 

BooRadley » 06 May 2024, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 8:25 am

Are you really Tom Hanks?

If you believe I'm not a guy then just move on.

Why does it bother you so much?

I'm a man
You can believe anything you want

Look Z09

I don’t care that CP let you come back

its not my playpen 

I figure he got tired of you begging to suck his dick and gave in

Dontlooknow told me how relentless you were to suck his dick after you found out that he was rich   

just give it up ****

We ALL know 
 
 
 

Mrkelly » 06 May 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 9:33 am

Look Z09

I don’t care that CP let you come back

its not my playpen 

I figure he got tired of you begging to suck his dick and gave in

Dontlooknow told me how relentless you were to suck his dick after you found out that he was rich   

just give it up ****

We ALL know

If you really don't care why do you bring it up so often?
 

Squatchman » 06 May 2024, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 7:50 am

  
Watch this.

              

BooRadley » 06 May 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 9:40 am

If you really don't care why do you bring it up so often?

the only thing that I often bring up is

you are a lying **** that calls people liars   

you are just mad because I remind you of how dontlooknow stood you up after he saw that you were a skanky crackhead   
 

Mrkelly » 06 May 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 9:44 am

you were a skanky crackhead 

  Are you saying that a $20.00 rock is all it takes to get in her pants?
****,I can afford that.
 

Squatchman » 06 May 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 9:52 am

  Are you saying that a $20.00 rock is all it takes to get in her pants?
****,I can afford that.

Roger Patterson failed to pay his Bigsuit wearer a promised $1,000, says Heironimus—a credible claim in light of Patterson’s repeated theft of services (some $700 in long-distance charges to a neighbor’s home; about $2,000 for printing his 1966 book, Do Abominable Snowmen of America Really Exist? ; a $700 loan; and so on and on). Patterson had a habit of ripping off people. Morris says Patterson tried to get him to send the gorilla suit on approval, but Morris demanded payment in advance, and Patterson then sent a money order. Once he had obtained and modified Bigsuit, Roger Patterson was set to perpetrate one of the most audacious hoaxes of the twentieth century.

Mrkelly » 06 May 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 9:44 am

the only thing that I often bring up is

you are a lying **** that calls people liars   

you are just mad because I remind you of how dontlooknow stood you up after he saw that you were a skanky crackhead 

If you really don't care why do you bring it up so often?

Squatchman » 06 May 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 9:52 am

  Are you saying that a $20.00 rock is all it takes to get in her pants?
****,I can afford that.

never heard what she charges

I think she just likes giving blowjobs

guys on the other board said that the ONLY redeeming thing about her bowjobs is that she swallows  

they all said that she never stopped talking the whole time   

Squatchman » 06 May 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2024, 9:52 am

  Are you saying that a $20.00 rock is all it takes to get in her pants?
****,I can afford that.

So Squatchman

Since you believe the Big Foot tape is real why hasn't anyone else gotten a video after 60 years?

And why did Patterson buy a ape costume before his famous sighting?