What is his definition of “major”

By Buck Naked
8 May 2024 6:49 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2
Buck Naked
9 May 2024 4:14 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
13,727 posts
Has he clarified this yet? The world is waiting
User avatar
Sumela
9 May 2024 4:30 pm
User avatar
      
22,501 posts
Major Barry McCokiner
Buck Naked
9 May 2024 4:43 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
13,727 posts
Quid pro Joe
User avatar
31st Arrival
9 May 2024 4:48 pm
User avatar
      
25,766 posts
Warcok » 08 May 2024, 8:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Withholding congressionally approved military aid in an election year to appease the jihad squad of your party so you can get reelected sounds like an impeachable offense.
When this country was founded, it was set up to elect representatives, not leaders directing people into the promise land of better tomorrows when simply adapting to things never the same here, each rotation every lifetime is equally created and equally separated in series parallel existing as timed apart occupying space now.

See there isn't an elected official honoring the Constitutional Republic.

they(local, city, county, state, federal) are all working democracy by mob rule precedence in typecasting ancestors as stereotypes and punishing anyone not staying on scripted outcomes tomorrow.
User avatar
Jantje_Smit
10 May 2024 2:44 am
User avatar
      
6,017 posts
BuckNaked » 09 May 2024, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Has he clarified this yet? The world is waiting
He can't clarify it, his handlers haven't told him why he had to say it..

:die:  

 
In memory of Pumpkins

Image
User avatar
31st Arrival
10 May 2024 5:50 am
User avatar
      
25,766 posts
Jantje_Smit » 10 May 2024, 2:44 am » wrote: ↑ He can't clarify it, his handlers haven't told him why he had to say it..

:die:  

 
ever think he in his incapacity didn't add "ity" suffix to "major". 50.1% is a majority over 49.9% and there comes an instinctive problem with odd numbers involved.
0-9 or 1-10. the middle point is different between the two sets of integers. 4 or 5 relative to each interpretation are correct to their one sided angle. here is the riddle, period of time, decimal point, period between two sentences of a paragraph, part of a page, in a book, telling a story of anything else possible than life limited to adapting as displaced since conceived living eternally separated each rotation of the planet now.

How many times do I have to explain physical eternity to your evolving time uniquely here you cling to clowning around pretending it can't be because humanity says it isn't possible. What is humanity but history recording humans ignoring life doesn't exceed this rotation each rotation added while this planet is perpetually balancing space between incoming ancestors and outgoing ancestry at this specific universal position each rotation.

One side never wins the so called win win scenario evolving has no winners, just results evolving forward in this rotation left evolving in the next never same results again.
Simple compounding combinations in series parallel events just population changing forms shaped since conceived into generation gaps here now.
1 2

Who is online

In total there are 3279 users online :: 10 registered, 14 bots, and 3255 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, Not, Bolt, ADmantX, proximic, CriteoBot, LCC, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, Googlebot, YandexBot, bingbot
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search