sootedupCyndi » 18 May 2024, 8:34 pm » wrote: ↑ no.The chiropractors wifey. LOL
she gets mad when i go in there with one on my boot. **** happens once in awhile.
i never thought i should explain a thing like that. but these days i'd better.![]()
me- normal woman- who likes men.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Bumbles:Beekeeper » 17 May 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ Well, DICKSUCK, he HAPPENS to be 100% CORRECT in that if ALL100 senators are present, and there are 50 votes yea, and it results in a TIE, which it would be, the VP CASTS THE DECIDING VOTE!! IF it's a YEA, the measure PASSES!!
Seems your "Naval academy" education FAILED YOU ONCE AGAIN!! But it DID teach you how to SUCK ADMIRAL'S COCK to perfection, huh??
lmao! That is the best gotcha ya got?maineman » 19 May 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ Bumbles:
As you know, I have you on ignore but I still get notifications every time you quote me or mention me. Every once in a while, I take the time to open one of those posts, and every single time, I find you doing your best "Pigeon Playing Chess" impersonation. Your posts are always heavy on insulting comments, and always light on intellectual content... like this one.
When @golfboy says, "Yes *******, fifty VOTES are all that is needed to pass a bill in the Senate when all Senators are present and voting" he is not 100% correct. He is 100% WRONG. And you prove it yourself in the second part of your first run-on sentence. The VP breaks the tie.... and he breaks it with a .... wait for it..... wait for it.... A VOTE!!! THE FIFTY-FIRST VOTE!!! If all senators are present and voting, fifty votes will not pass ****. The tally can be 51-49 or it can be 51-50. But the winning number can never be less than 51 when the whole gang is there and voting yea or nay.
True to form, you hop up on the chess board, knock over the pieces, drop a pile of ****, and then strut around proclaiming yourself the victor. That's your schtick. I choose not to participate in that sort of adolescent banter, so I will keep you on ignore.
If you persist in mentioning me in your posts, I will, unfortunately, continue to get notifications of those mentions. From time to time, I may open one to see if you have grown up at all. If, at some point in the future, it seems like you have, I may reconsider engaging you in routine discussions, but certainly not before.
AMF
You admitted you added "when all Senators are present and voting".maineman » 18 May 2024, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑ What words did I change? I didn't change anything. I simply clarified what we were talking about. And, after I clarified that we were, in fact, not talking about the myriad possibilities of Senate passing votes from 26-25 to 51-50, and that we were, for the purpose of that discussion, talking about a full senate chamber. AND AFTER WE GOT ON THE SAME PAGE, you said, and I quote, "yes *******. fifty VOTES are all that is needed to pass a bill in the senate when all senators are present and voting".
Still as wrong as when you first wrote them.
You're an admitted pedo.golfboy » 19 May 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ You admitted you added "when all Senators are present and voting".
This happened AFTER I showed you that you were wrong.
Why do you keep doubling down on stupid?
golfboy » 19 May 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ You admitted you added "when all Senators are present and voting".
This happened AFTER I showed you that you were wrong.
Why do you keep doubling down on stupid?
Well he is an admitted pedo.maineman » 19 May 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ You never showed anything of the sort. I have never been wrong about how the Senate votes.
I added it to make sure we were talking about the same thing.
and even after I did, you posted the now infamous retort:
"YES *******, FIFTY VOTES IS ALL THAT'S NEEDED TO PASS A BILL IN THE SENATE WHEN ALL SENATORS ARE PRESENT AND VOTING"
he's particularly fond of Mexican second graders
What do you charge? I know a few horses...sooted up Cyndi » 18 May 2024, 8:34 pm » wrote: ↑ no.The chiropractors wifey. LOL
she gets mad when i go in there with one on my boot. **** happens once in awhile.
i never thought i should explain a thing like that. but these days i'd better.![]()
me- normal woman- who likes men.
I just did, fruity.
Repetition isn't going to change the fact that you were wrong, and THAT is why you changed your statement.maineman » 19 May 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ You never showed anything of the sort. I have never been wrong about how the Senate votes.
I added it to make sure we were talking about the same thing.
and even after I did, you posted the now infamous retort:
"YES *******, FIFTY VOTES IS ALL THAT'S NEEDED TO PASS A BILL IN THE SENATE WHEN ALL SENATORS ARE PRESENT AND VOTING"
Says the guy that literally moved there to get access to little Mexican boys.
Lol, you can't make anyone do ****. Wipe your *** and get a job ***.Cannonpointer » 19 May 2024, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ I just did, fruity.
I made you cry like a bitch and run to your masters at snopes for help you deal with being a tranny supporting ***.
Is that true? Is he a *** dick sucker?golfboy » 19 May 2024, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Says the guy that literally moved there to get access to little Mexican boys.
I've made you identify as a flagrant homosexual child danger.murdock » 19 May 2024, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Lol, you can't make anyone do ****. Wipe your *** and get a job ***.
Probably, but he definitely like little boys.