golfboy » 19 May 2024, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Repetition isn't going to change the fact that you were wrong, and THAT is why you changed your statement.
golfboy » 19 May 2024, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Says the guy that literally moved there to get access to little Mexican boys.
Lol, a you're a *** in your own mind, And, a lying son of a *** whore. You, go **** more little boys and with luck a parent will kill you.Cannonpointer » 19 May 2024, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I've made you identify as a flagrant homosexual child danger.
Lol, leftist cocksuckers like you always claim to know but in reality you're A LYING piece of dog ****. So, be careful where the dog **** you, ok?maineman » 19 May 2024, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I was never wrong. I have known exactly how the US Senate works since ninth-grade Civics class.
When will YOU quit running from your misstatement?
Ah, yes. Little Mexican boys must have been an interesting experience for you.maineman » 19 May 2024, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ liar. My wife and I moved to Mexico to experience a foreign culture and have an adventure while we were still young enough to enjoy it. Mission accomplished.
And yet, what you said, was indeed wrong.maineman » 19 May 2024, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I was never wrong. I have known exactly how the US Senate works since ninth-grade Civics class.
When will YOU quit running from your misstatement?
no, you didn't..you just threatened like the impotent **** you actually are...Cannonpointer » 19 May 2024, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ I just did, fruity.
I made you cry like a bitch and run to your masters at snopes for help you deal with being a tranny supporting ***.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom golfboy » 19 May 2024, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑ And yet, what you said, was indeed wrong.
It's okay, everyone knows you're a low IQ liberal.
You changed your rhetoric AFTER I proved you were wrong.maineman » 19 May 2024, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ what did I EVER say that was indeed wrong?
My only error was assuming we were talking about the entire Senate.
Again... after we had cleared that miscommunication up and we both knew we were, in fact, talking about a full senate... you said, and I quote, "Yes *******, fifty votes is all you need to pass a bill in the Senate when all Senators are present and voting" Do you have anything to say about how wrong that really was?
maineman » 19 May 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ Bumbles:
As you know, I have you on ignore but I still get notifications every time you quote me or mention me. Every once in a while, I take the time to open one of those posts, and every single time, I find you doing your best "Pigeon Playing Chess" impersonation. Your posts are always heavy on insulting comments, and always light on intellectual content... like this one.
When @golfboy says, "Yes *******, fifty VOTES are all that is needed to pass a bill in the Senate when all Senators are present and voting" he is not 100% correct. He is 100% WRONG. And you prove it yourself in the second part of your first run-on sentence. The VP breaks the tie.... and he breaks it with a .... wait for it..... wait for it.... A VOTE!!! THE FIFTY-FIRST VOTE!!! If all senators are present and voting, fifty votes will not pass ****. The tally can be 51-49 or it can be 51-50. But the winning number can never be less than 51 when the whole gang is there and voting yea or nay.
True to form, you hop up on the chess board, knock over the pieces, drop a pile of ****, and then strut around proclaiming yourself the victor. That's your schtick. I choose not to participate in that sort of adolescent banter, so I will keep you on ignore.
If you persist in mentioning me in your posts, I will, unfortunately, continue to get notifications of those mentions. From time to time, I may open one to see if you have grown up at all. If, at some point in the future, it seems like you have, I may reconsider engaging you in routine discussions, but certainly not before.
AMF
golfboy » 19 May 2024, 9:27 pm » wrote: ↑ You changed your rhetoric AFTER I proved you were wrong.
You keep repeating yourself, but you already admitted the truth.
This is why you'll always be my bitch.
ROG62 » 19 May 2024, 8:34 pm » wrote: ↑ no, you didn't..you just threatened like the impotent **** you actually are...
****, you're just flat out stupid...Cannonpointer » 20 May 2024, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑ I made you cry like a bitch and run to your masters at snopes for help you deal with being a tranny supporting ***.
First you said they "cucked" me, THEN you claimed you did me a solid by proving me right.
You're all over the map - a sure sign of your desperation.
I side with Christian men - you side with devil culture. You suck ***.
Now, go call Bruce Caitlyn, you weak-minded ***.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Now, is that you talking, or snopes, you weak, tranny supporting ***?ROG62 » 20 May 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ ****, you're just flat out stupid...
you are full blown cucked on anything anti Israel and anti Ukraine...which is why you faceplant on any bandwagon that fits your hatred...
your only **** narrative you and smello can conjure is "*** this and *** that, trans blah blah blah...in a feeble attempt to link anyone to this **** flat on its face lie about their presumed sexuality, yet he's happily married with two children...as I am...
you **** are the weak tits, and guess what, you're the only admitted presumedly male poster who's blown another guy...
I guess the only real *** here is YOU! suck on that, bitch...
I find it somewhat pathetic that you would write that sentence in direct response to a post of mine where I thoroughly kicked YOUR ***. "yes *******. fifty votes is all that is needed to pass a bill in the senate when all senators are present and voting" is 100% WRONG. It is so "bigly" wrong that I can shove it up golfboi's *** AND your *** at the same time.Beekeeper » 20 May 2024, 5:15 am » wrote: ↑ Sucks you lose so much here and so many kick your LWNJ ***, huh???
MM the forum bitch boimaineman » 20 May 2024, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ I find it somewhat pathetic that you would write that sentence in direct response to a post of mine where I thoroughly kicked YOUR ***. "yes *******. fifty votes is all that is needed to pass a bill in the senate when all senators are present and voting" is 100% WRONG. It is so "bigly" wrong that I can shove it up golfboi's *** AND your *** at the same time.
Now... If you had responded with something like, "Well, ya got me on that one", I might have considered taking you off ignore. But now I won't.
maineman » 20 May 2024, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ I find it somewhat pathetic that you would write that sentence in direct response to a post of mine where I thoroughly kicked YOUR ***. "yes *******. fifty votes is all that is needed to pass a bill in the senate when all senators are present and voting" is 100% WRONG. It is so "bigly" wrong that I can shove it up golfboi's *** AND your *** at the same time.
Now... If you had responded with something like, "Well, ya got me on that one", I might have considered taking you off ignore. But now I won't.
What a silly petulant little boy you are.Beekeeper » 20 May 2024, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ How about you READ THE DAMN CONSTITUTION, BOY!! THE PROOF IS RIGHT THERE THAT WHEN A TIE OCCURS, THEN THE VP CASTS THE DECIDING VOTE. SO ANYTHING that results in 50/50 votes- ALL SENATORS PRESENT AND VOTING- means a LAW WILL PASS IF THE VP VOTES AFFIRMATIVE
PERIOD!! So tell us again how you just played PIDGEON CHESS and got that **** YOU TRIED TO DUMP ON THE BOARD SHOVED BACK IN YOUR FACE, ***!!!
Still trying to find all that SEMEN in that "Naval Academy"?? We all know that you get PROMOTIONS based on how much ADMIRAL'S JIZZ you can take!!
I thought some bills require 60 votes?maineman » 20 May 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ What a silly petulant little boy you are.
The Vice President does break a tie - if he or she wants to, and/or if he or she is actually in the chamber - with a VOTE. The Vice President casts a VOTE. His/her VOTE is added to the tally.
His/her VOTE gives the winning side 51 VOTES. 50 VOTES are not enough to pass a bill if everyone is there. It can be 51-49 or it can be 51-50, but 51 is the number needed, not 50.
Are you REALLY that stupid or is this an act?
![]()
![]()
that's gotta hurt!