me? no...be a good little bitch and talk less, suck more, great taste, more filling...Cannonpointer » 20 May 2024, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Looks like that tranny dance got you excited again.
Tell us again how snopes "cucked" me by agreeing with me. You've danced around explaining that, fruity.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom well duh...it wasn't for you...maineman » 20 May 2024, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ your laugh emoji is just as devoid of intellectual content as every singe one of your posts.
****.
you bore me
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Bwaaahaaahahahahahahaha!! You funny boi!!maineman » 20 May 2024, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ and @Beekeeper here is where you can get off my ignore list. All you need to do is lose the insulting tone and just say,
"you're right, maineman.... fifty votes is NOT enough to pass a bill in the Senate when they're all there. I stand corrected."
and VOILÀ, I take you off ignore. Easy peasy
Beekeeper » 21 May 2024, 5:40 am » wrote: ↑ Bwaaahaaahahahahahahaha!! You funny boi!!
No, ****, you are STILL A MORON and wrong. ANY BILL can pass with 50 Senators voting yea. The VP BREAKING THE TIE is NOT A SENATOR VOTING, MORON!! And it's NOT RECORDED as a 51-50 vote, it's RECORDED as a 50-50 vote and a tie breaker cast by the VICE PRESIDENT.
Now,. want PROOF?? Well, well, looks like YOU GET YOUR *** KICKED AGAIN from an OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT SOURCE!!
U.S. Senate: U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 117th Congress - 2nd Session
maineman » 21 May 2024, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑ the VP breaking a tie is a VOTE. Nowhere did golfboi say that 50 senators votes were all that were needed. He simply said fifty votes. and 51 is the number. every time. sorry.
Beekeeper » 21 May 2024, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ ^^^ As the SQUAB struts around on the board, **** on every step, and getting his FACE SMEARED WITH HIS OWN ****!!!
Pssst. dullweed, he and I are 100% CORRECT. A VP is NOT a Senator and their votes are NOT RECORDED AS SENATOR'S VOTES. You can play word games all day long, but FACTS SHOVED UP YOUR *** take the day EVERY. SINGLE. TIME!!
Enjoy your **** FACE!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
maineman » 21 May 2024, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ nowhere did anyone say anything about "senators" votes. Fifty votes are not all that are needed if they all vote. 51 is the number. It can be 51-49 or 51-50
RebelGator » 21 May 2024, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ You must be so proud to know that vote #51 is currently owned by a brain dead whore that blew her way into that position.
KILL YOURSELFmaineman » 21 May 2024, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ do you talk to your mother with that mouth, you **** pig?
maineman » 21 May 2024, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ @Beekeeper
If @golfboy had said "fifty senators - and a concurring, present, and voting vice president - are all that is needed to pass a bill in the senate when all senators are present and voting", he would be correct and we wouldn't be having this discussion. He didn't say that, however.
maineman » 21 May 2024, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ do you talk to your mother with that mouth, you **** pig?
maineman » 21 May 2024, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ @Beekeeper
If @golfboy had said "fifty senators - and a concurring, present, and voting vice president - are all that is needed to pass a bill in the senate when all senators are present and voting", he would be correct and we wouldn't be having this discussion. He didn't say that, however.
If what the Vice President did was something other than casting a vote, they wouldn't call it a VOTE.
maineman » 21 May 2024, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ nowhere did anyone say anything about "senators" votes. Fifty votes are not all that are needed if they all vote. 51 is the number. It can be 51-49 or 51-50
Beekeeper » 21 May 2024, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ The VP is NOT a SENATOR, DILLASS!! 50 SENATORS CASTING A YEAH VOTE means that the bill will either PASS OR FAIL after the VP breaks the tie. There is no provision for the VP to vote EXCEPT in the case of a tie and then they cast a TIE BREAKER. Sucks you can't seem to fathom that ONE SIMPLE FACT!!
Keep being the **** PIDGEON and see how much that **** starts to really stink as it continually gets slung on your face!!
redneck inbred ignorance noted.RebelGator » 21 May 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ Hypocricy[sic] noted......it's a constant with your ilk.
Beekeeper » 21 May 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ So when your LWNJ Angus King Senator takes a few days off and doesn't vote on bills, and it comes in at 50-49, does the bill pass?? And did the VP have a TIEBREAKER??
No??? Well damn. You kicked YOUR OWN ***, ****!!