golfboy » 22 May 2024, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑ ^^ ******* doesn't even understand what "truncating" means.
Using your complete sentence isn't "truncating".
No *******. That's known as cherry picking.maineman » 22 May 2024, 6:55 pm » wrote: ↑ If the full meaning of the sentence is contained in a group of sentences, then cutting those parts of the quote is indeed truncating. To shorten by cutting off a part.
tell us again about fifty votes being all that are needed, moron.
Cannonpointer » 22 May 2024, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑ What do you have to offer the board?
I see.
Wanna tell us again how I got "cucked" by your snopes fact check, fruity?
Or are you too busy cheering for your tranny dancing hero?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom golfboy » 22 May 2024, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ No *******. That's known as cherry picking.
Truncating is taking part of a sentence and normally indicated by "...".
You should have stayed in high school and taken an English composition class.
GHETTOBLASTER » 22 May 2024, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ You have no idea how cringeworthy you look...but neither did Deputy Barney Fife....![]()
Do you wear BRASS KNUCKLES AND AN EXECUTIONER'S HOOD while typing at your key board...?
^^ still doesn't understand what "truncating" means, even when it's been explained to him.maineman » 22 May 2024, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I gave you the definition. You truncated my point by only quoting one sentence in a paragraph and that remaining sentence did not accurately contain or reflect that point.
tell us again about the fifty votes, you **** tap dancing, shucking, jiving, weaseling coward.
mainibtch didn't know a bill could pass the senate with less than 50 votes until I showed him.maineman » 22 May 2024, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ isn't it funny how @golfboy just can't quite bring himself to admit that fifty votes are NOT all that is needed to pass a bill in the Senate when all Senators are present and voting.
No bill makes it out of a full, all-voting senate without 51 votes. Years later, and I have repeatedly rubbed his nose in that stupid quote and he NEVER admits he was wrong.
what a ******.
^^ hilarious listening to a guy who admitted on this forum that he showered with his daughter, and moved to Tijuana so he could molest little Mexican boys, calling anyone else a pedophile.
golfboy » 22 May 2024, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ ^^ hilarious listening to a guy who admitted on this forum that he showered with his daughter, and moved to Tijuana so he could molest little Mexican boys, calling anyone else a pedophile.
I always knew. I added the phrase to ensure we were talking about the same situation.golfboy » 22 May 2024, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑ mainibtch didn't know a bill could pass the senate with less than 50 votes until I showed him.
That's when he altered his statement to include "when all Senators are present and voting".
Every time he get's his *** kicked in pubic[SIC], he circles back and repeats his original lie.
Sure you did, pedo.maineman » 22 May 2024, 7:35 pm » wrote: ↑ I took my young daughter into the shower to clean mud off her body and to get rid of leeches. I wore my swimsuit the entire time.
You were closer to Tijuana in Boise than I was in Merida. YOU, unbidden, offered me the services of a mexican second grader. That disgusted me.
And again... 50 votes... when ya gonna admit you **** up?
Poor mainbitch. Repeating his lie because he got his *** handed to him in public, yet again.maineman » 22 May 2024, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I always knew. I added the phrase to ensure we were talking about the same situation.
And, after I added it, you replied,
"YES, *******, FIFTY VOTES IS ALL THAT IS NEEDED TO PASS A BILL IN THE SENATE WHEN ALL SENATORS ARE PRESENT AND VOTING"
WRONG THEN, WRONG NOW. AND YOU HAVE NEVER ADMITTED IT.
******.
golfboy » 22 May 2024, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure you did, pedo.
If my offer of finding a 2nd grader to tutor you in economics disgusted you, why did you get so sexually exited, immediately talking about having sex with him?
You've admitted I was right about a bill being able to pass the Senate with fewer than 51 votes.
Why do you keep demanding I "admit" being wrong, when you've admitted I'm right?
golfboy » 22 May 2024, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Poor mainbitch. Repeating his lie because he got his *** handed to him in public, yet again.
Thanks for admitting you changed your statement after being proven wrong.
You're a liar. You're very first response was talking about having sex with them.maineman » 22 May 2024, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I never talked about having sex with children.
I have NEVER EVER said that a bill could not pass the Senate with less than 51 votes. I HAVE said that a bill cannot pass the Senate with only 50 votes if all senators are present and voting. YOu are on record as saying that they can. You are wrong. And you won't admit it.
golfboy » 22 May 2024, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a liar. You're very first response was talking about having sex with them.
Your statement was that a bill had to have 51 votes to pass the Senate.
You changed your statement when I embarrassed you in public by showing you bills that passed with fewer votes.
you see he earned the tag "Child Groomer, Sexual Predator"golfboy » 22 May 2024, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a liar. You're very first response was talking about having sex with them.
Your statement was that a bill had to have 51 votes to pass the Senate.
You changed your statement when I embarrassed you in public by showing you bills that passed with fewer votes.
Groomer Pyle is right. You need 51 votes in the Senate to pass a bill. They call for quorum and if not all 100 senators are present they stable the vote.golfboy » 22 May 2024, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a liar. You're very first response was talking about having sex with them.
Your statement was that a bill had to have 51 votes to pass the Senate.
You changed your statement when I embarrassed you in public by showing you bills that passed with fewer votes.