And each of those jobs had been invented by the job faerie to teach ya stuff.ROG62 » 19 May 2024, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Well it was when I started working at 13...
there were 3 choices, fast food, pumping gas or farm work...
we considered those entry level...earn some scratch and learn some responsibility...
something apparently you never had to do...
BTW, you're a miserable ****...
Manhattan. They can commute from their one bedroom apartment in Jamaica Queens
Median home cost jamaica queens 451 per foot - 725k.Warcok » 19 May 2024, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Manhattan. They can commute from their one bedroom apartment in Jamaica Queens
Maybe they'll be lucky and get in the Cash Cab and make enough money for a down payment on a mini CooperCannonpointer » 19 May 2024, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Median home cost jamaica queens 451 per foot - 725k.
Doesn't seem that crazy, especially when you factor in that you've mandated a commute in a rolling high security prison that has everything but the guards.
Conservative retards don’t understand economics.Cannonpointer » 19 May 2024, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ And each of those jobs had been invented by the job faerie to teach ya stuff.
Ya **** boob.
If I ever see you offer an original thought I will eat my hat, fruitcake. Arguing with you is like arguing with a chatbot. It's just tedious and utterly predictable.
You have no idea what you're discussingLowIQTrash » 19 May 2024, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Conservative retards don’t understand economics.
The matter in question is Supply of Labor (employee side) vs Demand for Labor (employer side)
If the Supply of Labor consistently and significantly exceeds Demand for Labor, what do these conjobs think will happen?
Of course the price of Labor will remain depressed and more and more people will drop out of the workforce (Labor Participation Rate) to try and re-establish “market equilibrium” (parity between work performed and compensation)
Yet these retards think there is a “shortage” of working hands!
no, ya dumb ****...those were the jobs available that allowed us to "learn about work, responsibility and money"...Cannonpointer » 19 May 2024, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ And each of those jobs had been invented by the job faerie to teach ya stuff.
Ya **** boob.
If I ever see you offer an original thought I will eat my hat, fruitcake. Arguing with you is like arguing with a chatbot. It's just tedious and utterly predictable.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom no, he did not...but you're either too stupid or drunk to realize the difference...Cannonpointer » 19 May 2024, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Looks to me like the queer doubled down. First he suggested 20 bucks an hour was a hundred k, and then he INSISTED that two people earning that are pulling down a hundred k.
He was an innumerate jackass in both cases.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Bidencrimefamily » 19 May 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ There is hope for you yet.
We laughed at you for years.
We would watch fox news just to hear what you would ve saying that day.
![]()
![]()
BooRadley » 19 May 2024, 5:21 am » wrote: ↑ Unless you hearing something he never said $20.00 an hour is six figures in a way he's suggesting you're making 100k.
They cut off his thought.
No, I had parents who taught me work ethic.ROG62 » 19 May 2024, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ no, ya dumb ****...those were the jobs available that allowed us to "learn about work, responsibility and money"...
no argument, just FACT...but I suppose as a comrade growing up in the USSR, your path was already paved, eh?
Okay, queer. No reason facts should be allowed to **** with your fox-fed agenda.ROG62 » 19 May 2024, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑ no, he did not...but you're either too stupid or drunk to realize the difference...
It's **** ARITHMETIC.*rippy38 » 18 May 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ Waters makes millions at FOX and is out of touch like most people in his position.
Ask any multi millionaire how much a loaf of bread, a gallon of milk, or a gallon of gas is right now, and they won't be able to tell you because they have people that buy these things for them.
As far as watching "cable" news, we haven't done that in a decade or better now. We only have one working TV in the house and the only time it's on is if there is a ball game I want to see or we are watching a movie.
The truth is much easier to discern in the printed word than when watching live propaganda. Lol
WTF?BooRadley » 19 May 2024, 5:21 am » wrote: ↑ Unless you hearing something he never said $20.00 an hour is six figures in a way he's suggesting you're making 100k.
They cut off his thought.
You do morons a disservice with this appellation.
I went to the link. The *** asked if that came to six figures. When an adult did the math FOR him - 40k, - he then said but but but if the spouse is working, THEN it's a hundred k.BooRadley » 19 May 2024, 5:21 am » wrote: ↑ Unless you hearing something he never said $20.00 an hour is six figures in a way he's suggesting you're making 100k.
They cut off his thought.
He shares his audience's aversion to numbers...Cannonpointer » 20 May 2024, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ You do morons a disservice with this appellation.
Even a moron can suss what 2000 x 20 equals.
He actually seems quite attracted to them.
As I stated earlier, the media's goal was to divert the topic of the podcast from "Why the $20 minimum wage is bad for the economy right now" to "Jesse Waters is a boob"... and it worked perfectly on the useful idiots as always.Cannonpointer » 20 May 2024, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ I went to the link. The *** asked if that came to six figures. When an adult did the math FOR him - 40k, - he then said but but but if the spouse is working, THEN it's a hundred k.
The guy is an idiot.
The actual answer of whether the MW hike is bad for the economy is more complex than your handlers led you to believe. A higher MW enables a % of existing workers to earn more but dis-employs / slashes the working hours of the remaining, so if you look at it purely from a consumption (consumer spending = higher GDP) POV then the MW is a more or less neutral policy.*rippy38 » 20 May 2024, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ As I stated earlier, the media's goal was to divert the topic of the podcast from "Why the $20 minimum wage is bad for the economy right now" to "Jesse Waters is a boob"... and it worked perfectly on the useful idiots as always.
Please stand and give yourselves a round of applause.
![]()
You too Veggie man.