Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2024, 5:34 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 5:34 am

If you insist on being an idiot, that's your call.

But the presiding judge knows much more than you do....hell, a chia pet knows more than you do.

https://i.postimg.cc/13pnKszW/tissue.gif
 

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2024, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑

21 May 2024, 9:23 pm

****, Coward.

you ask it of someone here damn near daily...

 I list all my sources with a link with every post that I've sourced...there's never a question of my sources...

nod and run...
 

ROG62 » 22 May 2024, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 5:54 am

you ask it of someone here damn near daily...

 I list all my sources with a link with every post that I've sourced...there's never a question of my sources...

nod and run...

Read the question again, ****.

Then answer it.

Blackvegetable » 21 May 2024, 9:22 pm » wrote: ↑

21 May 2024, 9:22 pm

You're a moron, Rog.

Stick a fork in your leg, RN, you've been flash fried on this one...ashes...
 
 

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2024, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 5:57 am

Read the question again, ****.

Then answer it.

****...
 

ROG62 » 22 May 2024, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 5:57 am

Stick a fork in your leg, RN, you've been flash fried on this one...ashes...

You debunked a photo of Grifty with a photo of Grifty?

Yes..."moron"...

Try insisting it can't be Grifty because only women wear makeup.


 

ROG62 » 22 May 2024, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 5:58 am

****...

Leave a long snail trail, Rog...

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2024, 5:36 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 5:36 am

entirely irrelevant, tiny toady

It is the crux of the matter. YOU don't get to decide what is relevant or isn't when you claim I am not posting facts.

Nod, Retardo Suave.  

Huey » 22 May 2024, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 6:27 am

It is the crux of the matter. YOU don't get to decide what is relevant or isn't when you claim I am not posting facts.

Nod, Retardo Suave.

No, it isn't..

It's what you tell yourself to make you feel better about your lack of integrity.

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.


 He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/

Nod.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2024, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 7:02 am

No, it isn't..

It's what you tell yourself to make you feel better about your lack of integrity.

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

 He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/

Nod.

The judge's feefees don't change the fact that the jury said it wasn't rape.

https://i.postimg.cc/vZBXdJfZ/Screensho ... 44-453.png

 
 

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2024, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 7:02 am

No, it isn't..

It's what you tell yourself to make you feel better about your lack of integrity.

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.


 He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/

Nod.
 
 

 

That is not what I am discussing.  You said I did not post facts.  Trump was not convicted in a criminal court for rape.  That is a fact.  

Huey » 22 May 2024, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 7:09 am

That is not what I am discussing.  You said I did not post facts.  Trump was not convicted in a criminal court for rape.  That is a fact.

Nor did he ever win The Preakness...

Entirely irrelevant.

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2024, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 7:24 am

Nor did he ever win The Preakness...

Entirely irrelevant.

 

Actually, when you claim I did not post facts it is entirely relevant.  

Huey » 22 May 2024, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 7:27 am

Actually, when you claim I did not post facts it is entirely relevant.

Tiny,

You tried to reframe.

You described an adjudicated fact as an "allegation".

You did so because you're a moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2024, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 8:02 am

Tiny,

You tried to reframe.

You described an adjudicated fact as an "allegation".

You did so because you're a moron.

I said he was not convicted of rape in a criminal court.  I also said he was found responsible for sexual assault in a CIVIL trial with a much lower burden of proof.

Both are facts.  You claim they are not. 

Huey » 22 May 2024, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 8:06 am

I said he was not convicted of rape in a criminal court.  I also said he was found responsible for sexual assault in a CIVIL trial with a much lower burden of proof.

Both are facts.  You claim they are not.

Tiny,

Grab your spork...


 

Huey » 21 May 2024, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

21 May 2024, 6:48 am

Allegedly.  

   

That is one hell of a case.  Pretend that Trump is a dem and then tell me what you think of the witnesses.

A bit of morning roughage..

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2024, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 8:12 am

A bit of morning roughage..

And that is where the reframe started.  Thanks, Reframey!

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2024, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 6:00 am

Leave a long snail trail, Rog...

are your pissflaps dragging?
 

Blackvegetable » 22 May 2024, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 8:08 am

Tiny,

Grab your spork...


 

 

You still can't admit I posted facts.