How would I know? It's a totally ridiculous and inappropriate question to ask. That is for the jury to decide. I haven't seen or heard all the evidence and testimony and neither have you. I am perfectly willing to await the jury's verdict.Beekeeper » 23 May 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ POST FAIL!!!
What CRIME did the PROSECUTION PROVE BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT??
THAT was the question, *******!!
FYI...he doesn't have to answer questions the way you think he should.maineman » 23 May 2024, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe, rather than strutting about like a bantam rooster, when asked if he would testify, he could have simply said, "I will leave that decision to my attorneys" and then shut the **** up?
Of course not. He doesn't HAVE to. He chose to do it his way and he made himself out to be a blustering fool who folded like a circus tent.ConsRule » 23 May 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ FYI...he doesn't have to answer questions the way you think he should.
The only people who think it makes him look like "a blustering fool" are whiny *** partisan liberals. Something tells me he isn't counting on your votes.maineman » 23 May 2024, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ Of course not. He doesn't HAVE to. He chose to do it his way and he made himself out to be a blustering fool who folded like a circus tent.
The only people?ConsRule » 23 May 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ The only people who think it makes him look like "a blustering fool" are whiny *** partisan liberals. Something tells me he isn't counting on your votes.
Just a hunch.maineman » 23 May 2024, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ The only people?
you know this how?
Something tells me you'd keep your lips wrapped around his anus even if he crapped in your mouth.
Yeah nitwit, and it's a misdemeanor, not a felony.
You wish his balls were in your mouth. Anyone voting for a senile fool is a **** idiot!
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT NOT TESTIFYING INSINUATES COWARDICE.maineman » 23 May 2024, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ I am certainly not crying about the fact that the clown showed himself to be a cowardly ******. Laughing is what I am doing, actually.
righteous » 23 May 2024, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT NOT TESTIFYING INSINUATES COWARDICE.
BUT YOU'RE STILL A ****** FOR IT BOTHERS YOU SO MUCH YOU HAVE TO COMMENT ABOUT IT
![]()
![]()
Zeets2 » 23 May 2024, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah nitwit, and it's a misdemeanor, not a felony.
Can you point to ONE CASE IN US HISTORY where such a "crime" was indictable as a felony?
There has NEVER BEEN ONE BEFORE, and any defendant found guilty of that misdemeanor has ALWAYS received nothing but a small fine and NOT EVER been prosecuted as a felony!
And they haven't even shown a shred of evidence as to Trump being guilty of a misdemeanor!
Don't you idiot Democrats realize how you've opened up Pandora's box with this stupidity?
You think Trump is going to forget all about this when he's re-elected, or will he do the same thing when HE controls the DOJ, the FBI, and the CIA in January and charges Biden, Obama, Hillary, and Hunter with the LEGITIMATE felonies they have ALL committed including treason?
Tell the truth! THAT'S why you're SO frightened of a Trump victory in these phony trials and on Election day, isn't it?
maineman » 23 May 2024, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ How would I know? It's a totally ridiculous and inappropriate question to ask. That is for the jury to decide. I haven't seen or heard all the evidence and testimony and neither have you. I am perfectly willing to await the jury's verdict.
this thread was about how Trump talks a big game and acts all tough claiming he wants to testify and that he WILL testify, but then... not so much. Maybe, rather than strutting about like a bantam rooster, when asked if he would testify, he could have simply said, "I will leave that decision to my attorneys" and then shut the **** up?
Kinda like you and the 51 votes a bill needs to make it out of a full senate.
maineman » 23 May 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ treason?
pure hyperbolic hyper-partisan tripe.
you're as big a clown as the clown himself!
Oh, so stealing top secret and classified documents that you were NEVER PERMITTED TO HAVE ACCESS TO by both Hillary and VP Biden, and then keeping all of them in unsecured locations where China had access to or on an ILLEGAL PRIVATE SERVER as Hillary did is not treasonous? You think they were secure when Huma Abadin and her dick-pixing idiot husband Anthony Weiner had them on the same computer that Weiner was sexting with teenagers and they shouldn't be charged in felonies of that severe nature?maineman » 23 May 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ treason?
pure hyperbolic hyper-partisan tripe.
you're as big a clown as the clown himself!
Zeets2 » 23 May 2024, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, so stealing top secret and classified documents that you were NEVER PERMITTED TO HAVE ACCESS TO by both Hillary and VP Biden, and then keeping all of them in unsecured locations where China had access to or on an ILLEGAL PRIVATE SERVER as Hillary did is not treasonous? You think they were secure when Huma Abadin and her dick-pixing idiot husband Anthony Weiner had them on the same computer that Weiner was sexting with teenagers and they shouldn't be charged in felonies of that severe nature?
CAVED AT WHAT, MOPBOY?????maineman » 23 May 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ It doesn't BOTHER me in the least. I think it's funny, that's all. He talks all tough and then he caves. He's a clown. Clown's make me laugh.
People who feel compelled to leave their caps lock key engaged all the time are begging for attention.
Beekeeper » 23 May 2024, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Yep, nitwit, TREASON!!!
Selling ACCESS to a SITTING VP is called TREASON when the VP is in on the PAYOLLA!!!
Sucks they never taught you CONSTITUTION 101 when you were in that SEMEN SCHOOL!! But you did learn how to suck Admiral's COCK!!!
After bragging that you couldn't wait to testify?