Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2024, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 6:40 am

The "PRB"?

The Puerto Rican Bimbo.  AOC blasted Green for her comment about the "physical appearance of another person" because of her comment about the fake eye lashes.  Yet she has remained mute on the line of clothing being hawked by Caterpillar Eyes Crockett that attacks the "physical appearance of another person".  Typical partisan hypocrisy.
 

Bidencrimefamily » 22 May 2024, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 7:21 pm

Yep MTG is one dumb bunny.

Any comments about the competition?

 

https://youtu.be/GejWoWBfoqg

 

ConsRule » 23 May 2024, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 6:51 am

The Puerto Rican Bimbo.  AOC blasted Green for her comment about the "physical appearance of another person" because of her comment about the fake eye lashes.  Yet she has remained mute on the line of clothing being hawked by Caterpillar Eyes Crockett that attacks the "physical appearance of another person".  Typical partisan hypocrisy.

Not that the butch baboon, or you, can be made to understand, but there are certain rules that apply in that context...

You'd be surprised how tight *** it can be...

(The priest? Strictly decorative....really!)
 

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2024, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 6:57 am

Not that the butch baboon, or you, can be made to understand, but there are certain rules that apply in that context...

You'd be surprised how tight *** it can be...

(The priest? Strictly decorative....really!)

An attack on the personal appearance of another person is an attack on the personal appearance of another person regardless of where it happens.  The PRB didn't blast Greene for violating a House rule (which would make your context whine applicable).  You are either against personal attacks, or you're not...apparently the PRB is not against them.

ConsRule » 23 May 2024, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 7:06 am

An attack on the personal appearance of another person is an attack on the personal appearance of another person regardless of where it happens.  The PRB didn't blast Greene for violating a House rule (which would make your context whine applicable).  You are either against personal attacks, or you're not...apparently the PRB is not against them.

An attack on the personal appearance of another person is an attack on the personal appearance of another person regardless of where it happens

It's crap like this that makes you an idiot.

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2024, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 7:17 am

It's crap like this that makes you an idiot.

So you think principles and ethics are conditional?

That's what it sounds like to me.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2024, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 6:40 am

How frequently are you owned, Coozie?

What frequency? Like you it is a constant owned by reasonable doubt life isn't self evidently evolving as physical absolutes genetics eternally separates any reproduction native to this atmosphere since life began in this atmosphere.

Relative time is which generation gap lived which rotation reproductions are never same population twice. Thermodynamic principles not ideological principals leading people into self deception every generation gap added.

the idea humanity is a species if a false flag narrative in every society cultivated and nurtured to believe instincts are evil and intellect is a greater good means of avoiding discussing self evident results every generation gap debating human rights to stay in character chosen after birth.

Specificity comes in 7 degrees of recognizing unique displacements in series parallel events. How, why, what, where, when, which, whom, place, thing existed or existing today.

7 degrees of maintaining reasonable doubt every generation gap alive. hope, faith, charity, rule of law, power, wealth, fame to those in charge of keeping people focused on tomorrow ignoring living doesn't exceed adapting to the moment each rotation becomes today between yesterday and tomorrow.
AM of tomorrow starts 0 degrees longitude over the pacific ocean north pole to south pole. Greenwich 180 longitude divides today apart from tomorrow on the Pm side of 24 hours until the planet reaches mid night as 360 degrees longitude is same location as zero degrees. Let us not forget opposing seasons north and south east and west, day or night, dawn to dusk or dusk to dawn and the generation gaps alive each rotation.

People of character loathe anyone capable of explaining their time living uniquely here as genetics eternally separates each reproduction native to this atmosphere. The person gets labeled insubordinate, traitor, liar against humanity's promises of better tomorrows than genetics delivered current population left alive this rotation.

truth to beliefs isn't honesty about adapting as displaced.

What creates an eternal hell within genetics eternally separating each ancestor alive this rotation each next rotation existing as a new total sum results of details never duplicated again? Church, state, economics, rank gets privileges, lead people to believe life isn't self evident, demand ancestries keep the faith humanity builds better tomorrows than yesterday's results here today.

Doing the same thing over and over expecting different outcomes every rotation of the planet. Insanity or Eternal Hell repeating the same ritual every generation gap lived and alive this rotation evolving never exceeded adapting as displaced since conceived equally inhabiting space this rotation.

ConsRule » 23 May 2024, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 7:38 am

So you think principles and ethics are conditional?

That's what it sounds like to me.

 
 

Bidencrimefamily » 22 May 2024, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 5:29 pm

Then MTG after being mad3 a fool made a comment about crockets eyelashes. 

Because MTG got owned and had nothing else to say. 

It was great. 
 

 

They all looked like idiots.  

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 8:15 am

Still not answering questions.  Some things never change.
 

ConsRule » 23 May 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 8:20 am

Still not answering questions.  Some things never change.

Your question is, even by your standards, irrelevant.

But so you'll staple your pissflaps shut.

The issue is "decorum in the chamber"....it's like having to wear a collared shirt to play golf.

Nod.

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2024, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 8:31 am

Your question is, even by your standards, irrelevant.

But so you'll staple your pissflaps shut.

The issue is "decorum in the chamber"....it's like having to wear a collared shirt to play golf.

Nod.

That may be YOUR issue, but it wasn't my question.  Why are you so scared to answer questions?
 

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 8:15 am

 
 

If you used your brain instead of that emoji, you could have responded with principals mind ideas directing career oriented souls ignoring their sole time adapting to each rotation of the planet they exist in never same total sum twice each next rotation forward now.

Compounding total sums are exponential compared to existential translations of hypothetical scenarios governing tomorrows each generation gap population is never same people alive today compared to yesterday and tomorrow.

How does relative time logistics corrupt actual time evolving since conceived? I posted the in another thread answering to this question, this morning.

Has to do with longitude being 24 time zones verse latitudes are temperate zones of one rotation, one revolution around the star, each time the cycles are working in series parallel movements as does evolving uniquely alive this rotation since the rotation of each reproductions conception until specific rotation of one's death.

Blackvegetable » 23 May 2024, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 6:40 am

How frequently are you owned, Coozie?

Never happened with you.

I have, more than once, stopped you in your tracks.
Usually pretty simple stuff really throws you, troll.

See how easy it is to just answer a question? You should try it.

31st Arrival » 22 May 2024, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 5:44 pm

The topic of anything else is possible debating hypothetical scenarios, science fiction, spiritual fantasy, economic value, historical precedence, current social consensus of people agreeing to disagree about how the universe is self evident when evolving uniquely alive as individually here changing shape since formed a fertilized cell in the rotation the event took place and each conception has its own time changing shape each rotation their form runs in the same pattern regardless male, female, asexual replacement to those added the conception to this ever changing population alive this rotation zygote, embryo, fetus, infant, toddler, adolescent, puberty, able to become 1 of 2 parents, might become 1 of 4 grandparents when offspring evolving into adults to conceive another generation gap the parents' parents become 1 of 4 grandparents.

You know the algorithm living within it all the time uniquely you each rotation never same shape as your original fertilized cell.

Shut the **** up you babbling excrement of a *** whore.

Bidencrimefamily » 22 May 2024, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑

22 May 2024, 5:29 pm

Then MTG after being mad3 a fool made a comment about crockets eyelashes. 

Because MTG got owned and had nothing else to say. 

It was great.

THE MONKEYS NATURAL ANIMALISTIC INSTINCT WAS SEEN AFTER INSULTED OVER HER LASHES. 
     
 

Jantje_Smit » 23 May 2024, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 6:55 am

Any comments about the competition?

 

https://youtu.be/GejWoWBfoqg

is that real hair?

BuckNaked » 23 May 2024, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 3:49 pm

is that real hair?

it probably is someones real hair

I doubt that it is hers

murdock » 23 May 2024, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 12:02 pm

Shut the **** up you babbling excrement of a *** whore.

See you won't discuss physical evolving, just debate evolution theory it could happen any other way than genetic timing of ancestors occupying space in series parallel time arriving the rotation conceived adapting to the moment until specific rotation dying.

Mrkelly » 23 May 2024, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑

23 May 2024, 4:10 pm

it probably is someones real hair

I doubt that it is hers

you notice she hasn’t worn fake eyelashes recently