Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:34 pm

Is it about "lying"?

If it's about the persecution of Ammosexuals, you must appreciate that I am most likely to favor turning up the heat..

Huey » 26 May 2024, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2024, 11:25 am

That has already been proven.

How about Biden saying he finished in the top half of his Law School Class?

Huey » 26 May 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2024, 11:59 am

And yet, he has yet to be convicted.  

It took years for Biden to publicly acknowledge his 7th grand child. To the point that we did not get the Christmas pic last showing the stocking in the WH.

Huey » 26 May 2024, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2024, 11:43 am

 making less than $400,000 per year will pay even a cent more in taxes under his proposals. He then added, “I hope you’re all able to make $400,000. I never did.”
 Facts First: Biden’s “I never did” claim is false. In fact, his presidential salary is $400,000 per year; the joint tax filings of President Biden and first lady Jill Biden showed $619,976 in income last year, $579,514 in 2022 and $610,702 in 2021. In addition, Biden earned millions in 2017 and 2018, when, during his time as a private citizen following his vice presidency, he and Jill Biden signed a lucrative book deal and he delivered paid speeches. The Bidens’ joint tax filings showed a total of about $11 million in 2017 income and about $4.6 million in 2018 income.
 Biden, who was a US senator for 36 years prior to his vice presidency, did regularly earn less than $400,000 per year before 2017. As PolitiFact has previously noted, the Bidens’ joint filings reported less than $400,000 in income in each year from 1998 through 2016 except for 2013, when they were just over $407,000.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/19/politics ... index.html
 

 

Huey » 26 May 2024, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

26 May 2024, 12:13 pm

Don't know what you want me to answer.

Here is another lie you will ignore:

WashingtonCNN — For the second time in less than a week, President Joe Biden falsely claimed Tuesday that the inflation rate was 9% when he began his presidency.Biden was criticized by many Republicans, including former president and current presidential rival Donald Trump, for telling CNN in an interview last Wednesday: “No president’s had the run we’ve had in terms of creating jobs and bringing down inflation. It was 9% percent when I came to office, 9%.”Biden repeated the claim about the inflation rate, albeit in slightly vaguer form, in a Tuesday interview with Yahoo Finance. This time, he said: “I think inflation has gone slightly up. It was at 9% when I came in, and it’s now down around 3%.”

 

Huey » 26 May 2024, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

26 May 2024, 2:47 pm

Here ya go BV.  Anything?  

White House makes nine corrections to Biden's NAACP speech transcript
https://abc3340.com/news/nation-world/w ... 4-election

What say you, Toady?
 
 

 

Huey » 26 May 2024, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

26 May 2024, 11:42 am

He has yet to be convicted.

He is wrong about 2020.

I doubt he is a genius.

 

 

Huey » 29 May 2024, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 1:44 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Can you list a few things to criticize or you don't like about Biden, Toady?

I'll add I think Trump talks too much **** on social media.

What ya got concerning biden?

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 1:57 pm

He isn't zealous enough in his persecution of ammosexuals.

He has been insufficiently strict with Bibi.

But he's right about 2020..

 

Huey » 29 May 2024, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 1:59 pm

That's weak and it took years to get you to do it.  

Oh, yhou know that inflation was not 9% when he took office, correct?

LMAO!

That's weak

and it took years to get you to do it.

Oh, yhou know that inflation was not 9% when he took office, correct?

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 2:25 pm

It's direct, unambiguous and coherent.

You should try that sometime.

When did the most recent conflict in the ME begin?

Yes.

What is it currently?

Huey » 29 May 2024, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 2:30 pm

Doesn't matter what it is currently.  He is trying to sway votes with that lie.  And it is higher than 1.4%, which is what it was when he took office. But to you, that is lie of no consequence.  

There is no need to persecute law abiding firearms owners.  We could use a push from the White House to states and locals to start hardcroe prosecuting illegal gun owners and those who commit crimes with guns

Huey » 29 May 2024, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 2:30 pm

Doesn't matter what it is currently.  He is trying to sway votes with that lie.  And it is higher than 1.4%, which is what it was when he took office. But to you, that is lie of no consequence.  

There is no need to persecute law abiding firearms owners.  We could use a push from the White House to states and locals to start hardcroe prosecuting illegal gun owners and those who commit crimes with guns

And it is higher than 1.4%, which is what it was when he took office.

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 2:34 pm

Of course...there were fewer Americans working than when his predecessor's term began.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 2:33 pm

Notice how your response shares none of the necessary qualities of an answer.

Huey » 29 May 2024, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 2:41 pm

Your question shares none of then necessary qualities of the context of the discussion, Reframey.  He lied.  You refuse to call him out for it.

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 2:43 pm

Fredo,

Try to gird your loins.

*rippy38 » 29 May 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 2:48 pm

You know that the strike through is seen as your method of surrender... right?

LOL

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 2:53 pm

By whom?

Why?