not only do we lack the personell required for some high casualty conflict, we also just dont have the industrial base to support such a thing. We would run out of ammunition in like a week...and then what would we do? Ask China to give us more?LowIQTrash » 26 May 2024, 10:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Historically when the economy is **** - which it has been since 2008 - the elites would foment some kind of excuse to drag the country into war. And I don't mean one of those silly wars where the DoD gets an unlimited budget to play around with and enrich their contractor friends...like building amazing roads in Iraq while potholes are scattered everywhere in America.
--------------------------------
As an aside, does anyone laugh at retarded conservatives for always speaking highly of the vaunted "free market" yet their top government program, which remains ideologically unassailable, is the corrupt and bloated Pentagon?
Hmm...just food for thought...on how retarded these people are; although I suppose you can make the case that "child groomer" progressives are trying very hard to outcompete conservatives for "BIG RETARD" prize.
And if you want ANOTHER kicker: remember how conjobs prior to Trump were always big on defending the criminal actions of the CIA, FBI, and other 3 letter agencies? If you criticized these agencies prior to 2016 you would be called "unpatriotic" even though they were always slimy/shady bastards. It wasn't until they were weaponized against Trump and the MAGA """movement""" that conjobs began to do an about face.
Typical, useless vermin!)
--------------------------------
So I'm just curious as to why this hasn't happened yet. (A "hot war" - where hundreds of thousands / millions will potentially die. I don't care about invading some **** 3rd world country without an Air Force.)
I AM willing to acknowledge that something of this sort is coming soon, as a Chinese invasion of Taiwan seems inevitable at this point. But good luck drafting a bunch of American Gen Z'ers who have zero desire to fight this type of war...maybe we should send the retarded Boomers who are keen on winning this "conflict?" If you read any of the traditional neocon/neolib sites it is mostly Boomers who insist on keeping Taiwan independent...the younger gens don't seem to care or are actively opposed.
Sumela » 27 May 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ US protects Taiwan?
St. America of the Sacred Tranny Heart![]()
No. Thats soooo cucky Deezy.
In my case I was aware of J Edgar Hoover's abuses of power but didn't really experience them as an adult who cared about **** like that.LowIQTrash » 26 May 2024, 10:40 pm » wrote: ↑: remember how conjobs prior to Trump were always big on defending the criminal actions of the CIA, FBI, and other 3 letter agencies? If you criticized these agencies prior to 2016 you would be called "unpatriotic" even though they were always slimy/shady bastards. It wasn't until they were weaponized against Trump and the MAGA """movement""" that conjobs began to do an about face.
Typical, useless vermin!)
PerfectFOS » 27 May 2024, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ not only do we lack the personell required for some high casualty conflict, we also just dont have the industrial base to support such a thing. We would run out of ammunition in like a week...and then what would we do? Ask China to give us more?
My name is jens and I don't like to boast,Sumela » 27 May 2024, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Just saw this...Russian soldiers are funny.
https://x.com/i/status/1794786463151997358
There is no shortage of teat suckers. They're just deployed everywhere except where the PEOPLE'S interests would dictate. The special interests are doing just fine.GHETTOBLASTER » 27 May 2024, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ In my case I was aware of J Edgar Hoover's abuses of power but didn't really experience them as an adult who cared about **** like that.
I think I speak for millions of Boomers about why we never got really irate about the abuse of power until it "hit home" and started looking like we are now living in a real life George Orwell novel.
With one out of every 35 people living on US soil being an ILLEGAL ALIEN.....all the [[[US GOV]]] needs to do to get some more troops in a hurry is pretty obvious.
Problem is, many of them could be thrown together in National Guard units and used against US Citizens.
Actually, we DO protect Taiwan. Taiwan would have chinee boots on the ground yesterday if not for the US. And it WILL have chinee boots on the ground eventually, both because of AND in spite of the US.Sumela » 27 May 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ US protects Taiwan?
St. America of the Sacred Tranny Heart![]()
If the NATO countries each agreed to specialize in one aspect of the military-industrial supply chain and shipped their production to the next nation in the chain, stage by stage, they could likely catch up to the russians very quickly.FOS » 27 May 2024, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ not only do we lack the personell required for some high casualty conflict, we also just dont have the industrial base to support such a thing. We would run out of ammunition in like a week...and then what would we do? Ask China to give us more?
The scenario I project would get more people in support of having a deep "talent pool" of Illegal Aliens on hand to draft into service ....if it means being able to keep their own kids a safe distance from future war efforts.Cannonpointer » 27 May 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ There is no shortage of teat suckers. They're just deployed everywhere except where the PEOPLE'S interests would dictate. The special interests are doing just fine.
Trust me - I'm buying enough weaksters' panties and pastries. We don't require more people on the teat. We just need the losers already on it to pull their **** weight.
On the bright side, all that ammo people have been stacking up gets to prove their usefulness…GHETTOBLASTER » 27 May 2024, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ The scenario I project would get more people in support of having a deep "talent pool" of Illegal Aliens on hand to draft into service ....if it means being able to keep their own kids a safe distance from future war efforts.
"Pin headed zika baby' OK, I laughed! Now gimme my images! DAMMIT!! Grrrrr.Cannonpointer » 27 May 2024, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ I'm just looking for opportunities to use the word. It's a neologism of my own invention - though it's so on-the-nose that I would not be surprised to learn it was coined long ago, more than once. Ditto for another of my neologisms: pin-headed zika-baby. Panty dancer, OTOH, I consider safely copyrighted and dibbsed.
Fight fuego with fuego?GHETTOBLASTER » 27 May 2024, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ The scenario I project would get more people in support of having a deep "talent pool" of Illegal Aliens on hand to draft into service ....if it means being able to keep their own kids a safe distance from future war efforts.
Ronjul says that everyone's images work. He brushed me off.Beakman » 27 May 2024, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑ "Pin headed zika baby' OK, I laughed! Now gimme my images! DAMMIT!! Grrrrr.![]()
![]()
![]()
This was the sort of idea that France had in the early 20th century, French foreign legion stuff.GHETTOBLASTER » 27 May 2024, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ The scenario I project would get more people in support of having a deep "talent pool" of Illegal Aliens on hand to draft into service ....if it means being able to keep their own kids a safe distance from future war efforts.
Maybe Germany could have helped make some artillery shells until we uh...blew up nordstream...Cannonpointer » 27 May 2024, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑ If the NATO countries each agreed to specialize in one aspect of the military-industrial supply chain and shipped their production to the next nation in the chain, stage by stage, they could likely catch up to the russians very quickly.
Okay, stop it, Laughing at my observation doesn't make it less true. It COULD be done.
What do you mean, "what planet"? THIS planet, damn you.
Stop it! Stop laughing!
But Taiwan is China. WASH DC policy says so...right?DeezerShoove » 27 May 2024, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Reason this out, Chinaman.
America "bristles" a bit so China does NOT attack Taiwan.
Get real with your stupid hate.
Sumela » 27 May 2024, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ But Taiwan is China. WASH DC policy says so...right?
So if Taiwan is China why does MuRQAA always provoke? Right?
Seems more like Murka wants
to PROVOKE China to attack....Just Ukraine and Russia.
Are you really this far behind? Really.
Sorry I hurt you so badly with truth.....better ice'up bro.DeezerShoove » 27 May 2024, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not looking for ways to damn America in every single crevice like you.
Carry on.