Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 9:26 am

Exactly.

You could have hopped an Uber, No Cars

 

Yeah, you wimped out.  'nuff said, tiny feet. 

Huey » 29 May 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 9:39 am

Yeah, you wimped out.  'nuff said, tiny feet.

You stopped 35 miles short, stood in a crowd of 40 thousand, and squawked

"Chase me."

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 9:40 am

You stopped 35 miles short, stood in a crowd of 40 thousand, and squawked

"Chase me."

 

I was there for 4 days.

Went to only two games. 
 

Huey » 29 May 2024, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 9:46 am

I was there for 4 days.

Went to only two games.

Not my job to track your itinerary

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 10:01 am

Not my job to track your itinerary

 

#Shrug

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 10:01 am

Not my job to track your itinerary

It appears that hiding behind your keyboard is what you do best.

Huey traveled 600 miles and you couldn't cover the last 30 to meet him?

Sounds like you chickened out to me.

LOL
 

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 9:25 am

Nearly 3 terabytes of records were turned over...just over 100 files were encrypted to protect witnesses.

Republicans have been offered to opportunity to see them.

Loudermilk has stopped popping off about it..

EVERYTHING you think you know, is wrong.

So show me the proof you claim that ALL the evidence was turned over to Republicans and support your idiotic claim that the forensic evidence DOES NOT SHOW that important documentation WASN'T intentionally deleted AS THE FORENSIC REPORT PROVES!:
A digital forensics team employed by the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight discovered the data deletion occurred on Jan. 1, 2023, and were able to recover the password-protected files. 

Just because YOU'RE a gullible partisan moron who doesn't understand what constitutes DEFINITIVE PROOF that's obtained through a forensic investigation, it doesn't mean that anyone with a brain would not understand that it's a FACT!
And nobody gives a **** if 100 terabytes of records were turned over, you idiot!  If the INCRIMINATING documents and files were intentionally deleted AS HAS BEEN PROVEN, then they HAVE NOT COMPLIED WITH THE ORDER!

You're the same kind of fool that Hillary expected everyone to believe when SHE ALONE determined what should be deleted and acid washed her computer of evidence THAT WAS UNDER SUPOENA, while providing the **** claim that it was only wedding plans and her yoga schedules in the 35,000 emails that SHE illegally destroyed!

Sorry buttercup!  NOBODY believes that ****!
 

Zeets2 » 29 May 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 10:24 am

So show me the proof you claim that ALL the evidence was turned over to Republicans and support your idiotic claim that the forensic evidence DOES NOT SHOW that important documentation WASN'T intentionally deleted AS THE FORENSIC REPORT PROVES!:
A digital forensics team employed by the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight discovered the data deletion occurred on Jan. 1, 2023, and were able to recover the password-protected files. 

Just because YOU'RE a gullible partisan moron who doesn't understand what constitutes DEFINITIVE PROOF that's obtained through a forensic investigation, it doesn't mean that anyone with a brain would not understand that it's a FACT!
And nobody gives a **** if 100 terabytes of records were turned over, you idiot!  If the INCRIMINATING documents and files were intentionally deleted AS HAS BEEN PROVEN, then they HAVE NOT COMPLIED WITH THE ORDER!

You're the same kind of fool that Hillary expected everyone to believe when SHE ALONE determined what should be deleted and acid washed her computer of evidence THAT WAS UNDER SUPOENA, while providing the **** claim that it was only wedding plans and her yoga schedules in the 35,000 emails that SHE illegally destroyed!

Sorry buttercup!  NOBODY believes that ****!

White House offers unredacted Jan. 6 transcripts to GOP — with conditions

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2 ... a-00137977

**** idiot.
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 10:35 am

White House offers unredacted Jan. 6 transcripts to GOP — with conditions

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2 ... a-00137977

**** idiot.

Naturally, you find a piece of **** from a far-left source like Politico to defend your stupidity!

The fact is that the Biden White House DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DICTATE TERMS TO CONGRESS!!!
Congress is a CO-EQUAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT and has the same rights to those documents as Biden does!
And if that turns up evidence that requires additional questioning by a Republican committee, THEN SO BE IT, and **** BIDEN'S WHITE HOUSE "TERMS"!

So stop being such a partisan and gullible moron who is happy to swallow any **** the Biden fawning left-wing media feed you!
 

Zeets2 » 29 May 2024, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 10:57 am

Naturally, you find a piece of **** from a far-left source like Politico to defend your stupidity!

The fact is that the Biden White House DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DICTATE TERMS TO CONGRESS!!!
Congress is a CO-EQUAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT and has the same rights to those documents as Biden does!
And if that turns up evidence that requires additional questioning by a Republican committee, THEN SO BE IT, and **** BIDEN'S WHITE HOUSE "TERMS"!

So stop being such a partisan and gullible moron who is happy to swallow any **** the Biden fawning left-wing media feed you!

Facts v. Bullzeet.


 

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 11:03 am

Facts v. Bullzeet.

So which is it that a dope like you doesn't understand?
That the US Congress is a CO-EQUAL branch of government that is entitled to that information WITHOUT CONDITIONS?
Or that Politico IS NOT a partisan far-left source of information that swallows Biden's **** as quickly as you do?

 

Zeets2 » 29 May 2024, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 11:39 am

So which is it that a dope like you doesn't understand?
That the US Congress is a CO-EQUAL branch of government that is entitled to that information WITHOUT CONDITIONS?
Or that Politico IS NOT a partisan far-left source of information that swallows Biden's **** as quickly as you do?

That the US Congress is a CO-EQUAL branch of government that is entitled to that information WITHOUT CONDITIONS?

no...it isn't...

Zeet,

You have no idea what you're braying about...you never do.

I blame ****, **** U...

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 11:42 am

no...it isn't...

Zeet,

You have no idea what you're braying about...you never do.

I blame ****, **** U...

Hard to believe I've got to constantly educate a dope like you!

The United States Constitution divides government into three separate and distinct branches: the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches. The concept of separate branches with distinct powers is known as "separation of powers."
 Each branch is theoretically equal to each of the others. The branches check each others powers and use a system known as checks and balances. Thus, no branch can gain too much power and influence, thus reducing the opportunity for tyrannical government.The LegislativeThe Congress is the Legislative Branch. Its main function is to make laws. It also oversees the execution of these laws, and checks various executive and judicial powers.

Checks of the Legislative

Checks on the Executive

Power to override vetoes
Power to confirm the President's appointment of a Vice President when a vacancy in the Vice Presidency occurs
Power to tax and allocate tax revenues for executive activities
Oversight and investigation of executive activities

Now, do you want to pull your empty head out of your *** and admit that the President HAS NO RIGHT according to the US Constitution to decide on terms that it can dictate to Congress on which document they are allowed to see and use in their investigation?

So why don't you explain to me how it is that you find it so easy to get your foot in your mouth and your head up your *** both at the same time?

 

Zeets2 » 29 May 2024, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:05 pm

Hard to believe I've got to constantly educate a dope like you!

Now, do you want to pull your empty head out of your *** and admit that the President HAS NO RIGHT according to the US Constitution to decide on terms that it can dictate to Congress on which document they are allowed to see and use in their investigation?

So why don't you explain to me how it is that you find it so easy to get your foot in your mouth and your head up your *** both at the same time?

Stop digging, Zeet...


 

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:07 pm

Stop digging, Zeet...

Translation...

Please get your foot out of my *** Zeet!

 

*rippy38 » 29 May 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:11 pm

Translation...

Please get your foot out of my *** Zeet!

You don't even know what's at issue, Stalky...

I've already proven Zeet COMPLETELY wrong....these are just his post mortem spasms.


 

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 10:35 am

White House offers unredacted Jan. 6 transcripts to GOP — with conditions

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2 ... a-00137977

**** idiot.

The question that should be asked is "How does the Executive Branch have the authority to keep members of the Legislative Branch from seeing unredacted transcripts of Legislative Branch proceedings without conditions?"

ConsRule » 29 May 2024, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:17 pm

The question that should be asked is "How does the Executive Branch have the authority to keep members of the Legislative Branch from seeing unredacted transcripts of Legislative Branch proceedings without conditions?"

Only by an uninformed imbecile.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:18 pm

Only by an uninformed imbecile.

Then you should be able to answer the question.
 

ConsRule » 29 May 2024, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:21 pm

Then you should be able to answer the question.

Sure....but it's entirely unnecessary.