Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 29 May 2024, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:46 pm

I remember when I tried to set up a fight with you.

It would have been a barn burner if my allergies hadn't gotten in the way.

ANd one last thing.  I never said I was going to go up there to fight.  I told him we could see if he would talk that way to my face.

Fights hurt, even when you win, you lose.  

ConsRule » 29 May 2024, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:49 pm

I read the story in the only link you posted.  It does not answer (or even address) my question.  Where does the Executive Branch get the authority to restrict members of the Legislative Branch from viewing...without conditions...unredacted transcripts of proceedings conducted by the Legislative Branch? According to the US Constitution, the Legislative Branch is equal to the Executive Branch and doesn't take orders from them.

I wonder how fast the Executive Branch would change their position on the matter is the House refused to pass any legislation containing funding for the Executive Branch until they get full access to the unredacted transcripts?

“We will make the unredacted transcripts available to you for review in camera, provided that you agree in writing to abide by the commitments made on a bipartisan basis by the Select Committee — to maintain the anonymity of the four witnesses consistent with the conditions under which the witnesses agreed to appear before the Select Committee, and to prevent the disclosure of ‘operational details and private information,’” Sauber wrote in a two-page letter to Loudermilk, which was obtained by POLITICO...

The Jan. 6 select committee publicly released the vast majority of its evidence, but withheld a handful of transcripts of White House aides and Secret Service officials. Those were sent to the White House and Department of Homeland Security for further review and redaction under the terms of an agreement struck in order to interview witnesses in the first place.

Cannonpointer » 29 May 2024, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:55 pm

No questions, dick sucker. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC-uPYyKSVQ

You're pantydancing away from ASKING a question..

 

Cannonpointer » 29 May 2024, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:55 pm

Oh, look. The dancy panty who runs from questions presumes to ask them.

This is awkward...

No questions, dick sucker. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC-uPYyKSVQ

 

Still working on it?

We can call it the "Cocksucker Conundrum", in honor of the Little Ballgummer.

@Huey  ​​​​​​​
 

Cannonpointer...every time I see the line in your signature "When you pee in the pool, have the guts to stand on the edge." I am reminded of an experience of Mike Greenberg. He was partnered with Mike Golic on "Mike and Mike"...a former morning show on ESPN. Greenberg would not let his kids pee in their pool, he made them go inside. They were at a huge BBQ in their neighborhood and his young son came to him and said "I have to go pee." Not wanting to ask the host to let them wander through his home dripping wet he told his son "Just this once, you can pee in the pool". A few minutes later he heard several guest laughing, he turned and saw his son, standing next to the pool, peeing into it.

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 1:03 pm

Still working on it?

We can call it the "Cocksucker Conundrum", in honor of the Little Ballgummer.

Huey  

In three concise bullet point explain why I should be interested in this.  

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:59 pm

“We will make the unredacted transcripts available to you for review in camera, provided that you agree in writing to abide by the commitments made on a bipartisan basis by the Select Committee — to maintain the anonymity of the four witnesses consistent with the conditions under which the witnesses agreed to appear before the Select Committee, and to prevent the disclosure of ‘operational details and private information,’” Sauber wrote in a two-page letter to Loudermilk, which was obtained by POLITICO...

The Jan. 6 select committee publicly released the vast majority of its evidence, but withheld a handful of transcripts of White House aides and Secret Service officials. Those were sent to the White House and Department of Homeland Security for further review and redaction under the terms of an agreement struck in order to interview witnesses in the first place.

I read that.  The question still remains, where does the Executive Branch get the authority to restrict members of the Legislative Branch from seeing unredacted transcripts of proceedings conducted by the Legislative Branch? And before you mention Executive Privilege, the time to exert that was BEFORE the staffers and Secret Service officials testified.  Once they testified, the transcript...WITH THEIR TESTIMONY...became property of the Legislative Branch.

ConsRule » 29 May 2024, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 1:08 pm

I read that.  The question still remains, where does the Executive Branch get the authority to restrict members of the Legislative Branch from seeing unredacted transcripts of proceedings conducted by the Legislative Branch? And before you mention Executive Privilege, the time to exert that was BEFORE the staffers and Secret Service officials testified.  Once they testified, the transcript...WITH THEIR TESTIMONY...became property of the Legislative Branch.

Because said Legislative Branch restricted itself to it, by agreement with the witnesses.

As stated.

Because the testimony touched on matters relating to secret service and WH operations, the Executive branch has the right to vet it.

 

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 1:03 pm

Still working on it?

We can call it the "Cocksucker Conundrum", in honor of the Little Ballgummer.

@Huey  

Ballgummer....  

​​​​​​​Thats what Xi and Putin call Old Fally McBiden  
 

Sumela » 29 May 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 1:16 pm

Ballgummer....  

Thats what Xi and Putin call Old Fally McBiden

​​​​​​​That is what Biden calls BV.

Huey » 29 May 2024, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 1:07 pm

In three concise bullet point explain why I should be interested in this.

1) Because you are the unwitting auteur of its namesake "The 2ndBesty Conundrum"

2) You are being honored

3) You should know


Acknowledge.

Huey » 29 May 2024, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 1:17 pm

That is what Biden calls BV.

No...that's what I've called you, Fredo.

Huey » 29 May 2024, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 1:17 pm

That is what Biden calls BV.

​​​​​​​

Putin's name for

Filthy *** Bammy...

...................................."""My personal slave throat"""

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 1:18 pm

1) Because you are the unwitting auteur of its namesake "The 2ndBesty Conundrum"

2) You are being honored

3) You should know


Acknowledge.

 

Ok.

 

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:07 pm

Stop digging, Zeet...

I will if you'd stop your lying and learn to stop swallowing every spec of **** that comes down the pike simply because you're a gullible fool who wants to believe in and support the idiot you voted for!
 

Cannonpointer » 29 May 2024, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 12:46 pm

I remember when I tried to set up a fight with you.

It would have been a barn burner if my allergies hadn't gotten in the way.

 

Zeets2 » 29 May 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 2:11 pm

I will if you'd stop your lying and learn to stop swallowing every spec of **** that comes down the pike simply because you're a gullible fool who wants to believe in and support the idiot you voted for!

You were wrong, Zeet.

Period.

End of story.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 May 2024, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 2:28 pm

You were wrong, Zeet.

Period.

End of story.

You're free to remain as ignorant as you choose.
Guess you don't mind being the laughing stock of the forum, huh?
 

Zeets2 » 29 May 2024, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 May 2024, 2:34 pm

You're free to remain as ignorant as you choose.
Guess you don't mind being the laughing stock of the forum, huh?

I'll go with Reality, Zeet...