Yer whore daughter's throatmaineman » 29 May 2024, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑ what do you use? tea leaves? a crystal ball? goat entrails?
It's kind of funny (in a "hey, that smells funny") kind of way, but Mister Bees seems to LOVE to write threads about me. This is something like his eighth, I think.Beekeeper » 28 May 2024, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey @maineman , if BABY MURDERING is such a winner, why are your DEMOCRAT NAZIS freaking out in massive numbers over the FACT that you have NO ISSUES that are positive to run on, and NO POSSIBLE WAY for your boy Biden to win??? And when your folks over at POLITICO NAZI PROPAGANDA admit that your doomed, you are MORE than doomed!!
It must really SUCK knowing that you're going to get your ASSES handed to you all because you elected bye-DUMB the mental degenerate!! Even you OWN NAZIS realize that 2024 is DOOMED to the depths of hell for you and your party!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A pervasive sense of fear has settled in at the highest levels of the Democratic Party over President Joe Biden’s reelection prospects, even among officeholders and strategists who had previously expressed confidence about the coming battle with Donald Trump.
All year, Democrats had been on a joyless and exhausting grind through the 2024 election. But now, nearly five months from the election, anxiety has morphed into palpable trepidation, according to more than a dozen party leaders and operatives. And the gap between what Democrats will say on TV or in print, and what they’ll text their friends, has only grown as worries have surged about Biden’s prospects.
“You don’t want to be that guy who is on the record saying we’re doomed, or the campaign’s bad or Biden’s making mistakes. Nobody wants to be that guy,” said a Democratic operative in close touch with the White House and granted anonymity to speak freely.
But Biden’s stubbornly poor polling and the stakes of the election “are creating the freakout,” he said.
“This isn’t, ‘Oh my God, Mitt Romney might become president.’ It’s ‘Oh my God, the democracy might end.’”Despite everything, Trump is running ahead of Biden in most battleground states. He raised far more money in April, and the landscape may only become worse for Democrats, with Trump’s hush-money trial concluding and another — this one involving the president’s son — set to begin in Delaware.
While he’s long lagged Biden in cash on hand, Trump’s fundraising outpaced the president’s by $25 million last month, and included a record-setting $50.5 million haul from an event in Palm Beach, Florida. One adviser to major Democratic Party donors provided a running list that has been shared with funders of nearly two dozen reasons why Biden could lose, ranging from immigration and high inflation to the president’s age, the unpopularity of Vice President Kamala Harris and the presence of third-party candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
“Donors ask me on an hourly basis about what I think,” the adviser said, calling it “so much easier to show them, so while they read it, I can pour a drink.”
The adviser added, “The list of why we ‘could’ win is so small I don’t even need to keep the list on my phone.”
Dems in full-blown ‘freakout’ over Biden - POLITICO
maineman » 29 May 2024, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑ what do you use? tea leaves? a crystal ball? goat entrails?
IF Trump wins the election, and IF his justice department indicts Joe Biden for ANY crimes, I would expect a jury of his peers to weigh the evidence against him and decide his guilt or innocence, JUST LIKE I EXPECT THE NEW YORK JURY TO DO. Simple as that, Mister Bees.Beekeeper » 29 May 2024, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑ YOU said that you thought the courts were being use appropriately, so weigh in on how Trump can kick Biden's *** and put HIM in the same court, same kinds of charges, and use it to DESTROY the entire Biden legacy!!
YOU seem think that is a LEGITIMATE use of the Judicial system- you know, to PUNISH your political foes, rather than a LEGITIMATE prosecution of actual CRIMES. Sounds like you can't get enough NAZI COURTS from your side, ASSHOLE with eyes!!
Sure..... Trump's going to get a fair trial from a jury that DeNiro has threatened if they return anything but a guilty verdict.maineman » 29 May 2024, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ IF Trump wins the election, and IF his justice department indicts Joe Biden for ANY crimes, I would expect a jury of his peers to weigh the evidence against him and decide his guilt or innocence, JUST LIKE I EXPECT THE NEW YORK JURY TO DO. Simple as that, Mister Bees.
RebelGator » 29 May 2024, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure..... Trump's going to get a fair trial from a jury that DeNiro has threatened if they return anything but a guilty verdict.
maineman » 29 May 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course he is. DeNiro is just an actor. His threats are just as meaningless as yours, Cletis.
Just can't name one, huh?maineman » 29 May 2024, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑ do you read your own posts, you **** inbred redneck moron?
maineman » 29 May 2024, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ IF Trump wins the election, and IF his justice department indicts Joe Biden for ANY crimes, I would expect a jury of his peers to weigh the evidence against him and decide his guilt or innocence, JUST LIKE I EXPECT THE NEW YORK JURY TO DO. Simple as that, Mister Bees.
You said I made threats.....**** you're more stupid.
Beekeeper » 30 May 2024, 4:41 am » wrote: ↑ What you "expect" isn't what you GOT in NY against Trump, *******!! What you GOT was a judge who showed 100% favoritism to the prosecution, refused to allow Trump to call witnesses that would provide exculpatory evidence to the prosecution's theory, and gave jury instructions that allowed a NON-UNANIMOUS VERDICT to be a guilty verdict!! Now want to explain how that is a "fair trial"????
maineman » 30 May 2024, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑ I do not share your opinion. He got a fair trial and hopefully he will get the verdict he deserves.
maineman » 30 May 2024, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑ I do not share your opinion. He got a fair trial and hopefully he will get the verdict he deserves.
Beekeeper » 30 May 2024, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑ ITS IN THE COURT RECORD ASSHOLE!!! So what don't you agree with?? That Merchan stacked the deck for a CONVICTION rather than guarantee the RIGHTS of Trump to present witnesses, to have objections FARILY and objectively considered, and to have JURORS that aren't partisan activists??
HOW **** a "fair trial" is that??? What would be your reply if Biden was given the SAME TREATMENT?? Other than "It's rigged for a conviction". TRUST ME, PUNK *** PIECE OF ****, ANY conviction will go straight to the SCOTUS for CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS by the Judge and TRUMP WILL WIN IT!! On the violations of the 5th and 6th Amendments!!
PERHAPS you should READ THOSE and then sit down and be HONEST with yourself and explain how Trump "got a fair trial" with TOTAL DISREGARD for those 2 amendments alone??? Hell, he never knew the "underlying crime" until the CLOSING ARGUMENT and he was NOT ALLOWED TO PRESENT ANY WITNESS to COUNTER THAT CLAIM!! "Fair trial"??? GO **** YOUR NAZI PIECE OF **** ***, **** MORON!!
maineman » 30 May 2024, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ Mister Bees is TRIGGERED!
Do you talk to your mother with that mouth?![]()
No one prevented Trump from presenting witnesses.
Voir Dire ensured that the jury was impartial.
And I don't have to trust you to know that any conviction will NOT go "STRAIGHT TO SCOTUS" because I know our system does not work that way. Apparently, you don't,
And I have read the amendments in question and unlike you, find no violation of them in the Trump trial.