More counterfactual Bullzeet.Zeets2 » 30 May 2024, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ Very true!
Democrats care nothing about any ridiculous crime they can't even name. All Biden wants is the ability to give a campaign speech calling Trump a convicted felon over and over until we want to puke! And any appeal that Trump is sure to win will likely come after election day.
I'm counting on at least one member of the jury who will put a stop to such a travesty of justice!
That's a pile of ****, informed exclusively by sources you are too ashamed to name.*rippy38 » 30 May 2024, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑ This is precisely what I was saying yesterday.
He pretty much told the jury that they could disagree on what they believe the Orange Man Bad actually did (or didn't do) as long as its something... and that'll do.
At this point they don't care about the appeal or any other fallout from their prosecutorial misconduct... all they want is the talking point that Trump was convicted in a criminal court heading into the election.
That's "justice"... progressive leftist style.
ok homoBlackvegetable » 30 May 2024, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ That's a pile of ****, informed exclusively by sources you are too ashamed to name.
Without unanimity on the 2 fundamental issues of fact, Grifty cannot be convicted.
There is no requirement for unanimity on the individual elements.
Post your example of Survivorship Bias.
Can you rationalize your passion for an old man in a fake tan?
Blackvegetable » 30 May 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Can you rationalize your passion for an old man in a fake tan?
Stay proud.
Blackvegetable » 30 May 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Can you rationalize your passion for an old man in a fake tan?
post your 3 primary sources of information.BuckNaked » 30 May 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ after the last 40 months **** show if you still support plugs n jugs your commitment to stupidity is impressive
Why won't Grifty testify under oath?BuckNaked » 30 May 2024, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ Why doesn’t he give them the instructions on a piece of paper?
It's sounds like the jury is in disagreement... which means the possibility of them hanging is definitely in play.lard » 30 May 2024, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ Contrary to popular belief, you don't even have to follow a judge's instruction.
I thought you said it was already over?*rippy38 » 30 May 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ It's sounds like the jury is in disagreement... which means the possibility of them hanging is definitely in play.
Why would he do that?