maineman » 30 May 2024, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ day one: ominous signs for the clown!
https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/29/opinions ... index.html
When did I say that?
You really need a new schtick Brown...
Works every time.*rippy38 » 30 May 2024, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ You really need a new schtick Brown...
That one is worn to a nub.
Only if you name your three primary sources... with bullet points.Blackvegetable » 30 May 2024, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ Works every time.
I accept your concession on his behalf.
When did I say that?
Are you strong enough to handle
We both know I've already done so.*rippy38 » 30 May 2024, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ Only if you name your three primary sources... with bullet points.
I just want to know when I said "it was over".Blackvegetable » 30 May 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Are you strong enough to handle
"Are these your words?" today?
I've never seen it... and certainly not with the bullet points.
Why would anyone believe you?*rippy38 » 30 May 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ I've never seen it... and certainly not with the bullet points.
Answer the question.*rippy38 » 30 May 2024, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ I just want to know when I said "it was over".
Interpretations and retellings need not apply.
LOL
Now your hiding... just like you did with Huey.
Post it already.
Cannonpointer » 30 May 2024, 6:01 am » wrote: ↑ As I stated on edit, I believe those instructions would cause a reversal on appeal, were Trump's jury to convict him on those flawed instructions.
Calm down Mister Bees. You shouldn't let yourself get so triggered.Beekeeper » 30 May 2024, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ Day 2, OMINUS[sic] signs for the PERSECUTION!!
Jurors looking down as instructions reread, intent on hearing how Cohen LIED, and how Pecker buried LOTS of stories for LOTS of people.
Damn, that must really SUCK for your "convicted felon" narrative, huh, NAZI PIECE OF ****??
Yourhormom U.