That's only because you lack the intelligence to understand the damage that's been done to our judicial system and the rule of law, or because you hate the country enough to cheer like an idiot over the decision.maineman » 31 May 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ I am shivering in my boots just THINKING about it, Doctor Bees!
I have a feeling that once the right side does finally start, its gonna be the real deal... and it wont be smashing windows, burning liquor stores, and looting Target either.sootedupCyndi » 31 May 2024, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ it's time to fight Rippy we need to shut the arssholes up... i am so disgusted.!!!
Zeets2 » 31 May 2024, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I think the SC will be forced to intervene immediately if the response from a couple of red state district attorneys choose to indict the 51 former "intelligence" agents who lied about the Hunter Biden laptop being Russian disinformation, OR FBI director Christopher Ray for supporting that claim when he knew at that time that the Hunter laptop was genuine but still forced Facebook and Twitter to remove any post referring to it.
Can you imagine how those court cases would be watched by the public for months and how future elections will be in total upheaval if the Supreme Court chooses not to get involved and let it play out like this case was?
You weren't so curious when it was Blue City *** abusing their positions.maineman » 31 May 2024, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ which red state DA do you think would have jurisdiction and standing to bring such a case?
RebelGator » 31 May 2024, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ You weren't so curious when it was Blue City *** abusing their positions.
Red states like Utah, Wyoming, Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, North and South Dakota, and any other Republican-held state have standing in federal election crimes just like NY had to make their case against Trump into a federal crime from what should have been nothing more than a state misdemeanor case, which is all that the Trump case should have been, even if the statute of limitation hasn't run out as was ignored in the Trump trial.maineman » 31 May 2024, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ which red state DA do you think would have jurisdiction and standing to bring such a case?
sootedupCyndi » 31 May 2024, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ it's time to fight Rippy we need to shut the arssholes up... i am so disgusted.!!!
maineman » 31 May 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ I am shivering in my boots just THINKING about it, Doctor Bees!
maineman » 31 May 2024, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ except he had jurisdiction. there's that.
nice dodge, by the way.
or should I say, nice engine-less trans-am up on blocks behind your trailer, Cletis?
Zeets2 » 31 May 2024, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Red states like Utah, Wyoming, Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, North and South Dakota, and any other Republican-held state have standing in federal election crimes just like NY had to make their case against Trump into a federal crime from what should have been nothing more than a state misdemeanor case, which is all that the Trump case should have been, even if the statute of limitation hasn't run out as was ignored in the Trump trial.
Beekeeper » 31 May 2024, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Funny how when ASSHOLES like you make statements like that....
THEY END UP HAVING THOSE WORDS SHOVED UP SO DEEP IN THEIR ASSES, THEY CAN TASTE IT FOR WEEKS!!!
GO **** YOURSELF YOU NAZI PIG **** DICKSUCK!!! I bet Rahm was your HERO, huh???
You mean the underlying crime that Judge Merchan told the jury not to worry about agreeing on but to just find the Bad Orange Man guilty anyway.maineman » 31 May 2024, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ The New York case was not a federal crime. It was tried by the Manhattan District Attorney, not the US Attorney.
And the statute of limitations was extended because the underlying crime that the record falsification was designed to cover was ongoing.
how? they will steal the election? seriously--- BeeBeekeeper » 31 May 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ We need to take out a BUNCH of these NAZI PIGS!!!
Every. ****. One. Of. Them!!
As I understand it, the FEC crime did not need to be specifically proven... there were four possible crimes that the jury had to choose from and they didn't even need to all choose the same one. Don't like it? Move to New York, run for the legislature, and if you win, you can submit a bill that will change the law so that it is more to your liking... until then you should probably call the waaambulance, Doctor Bees.Beekeeper » 31 May 2024, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑ That NEW YORK *** said that there was a FEC CRIME in his closing. Funny how NO MENTION OF IT NOR ANY WITNESSES WERE PRESENTED to VALIDATE THAT CLAIM!!! NOT A GODDAMN ONE!!!
But when TRUMP attempted to bring witnesses to PROVE there was NO CRIME AND EXPLAIN THE LAWS, that PIECE OF NAZI **** MERCHAN decided "NOPE, I don't think so"!! Which is a 6th AMENDMENT VIOLATION IN more than a COUPLE OF RESPECTS!!! AND YOU CHEER FOR MORE!!
GO **** YOURSELF ASSHOLE!!! NEVER come down this way!! EVER!!! You won't make it back to ME for your funeral even!!!
Beekeeper » 31 May 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ We need to take out a BUNCH of these NAZI PIGS!!!
Every. ****. One. Of. Them!!
maineman » 31 May 2024, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ As I understand it, the FEC crime did not need to be specifically proven... there were four possible crimes that the jury had to choose from and they didn't even need to all choose the same one. Don't like it? Move to New York, run for the legislature, and if you win, you can submit a bill that will change the law so that it is more to your liking... until then you should probably call the waaambulance, Doctor Bees.
That FEC crime was the reason the charges were felonies and not misdemeanors... and you say that the FEC crime didn't need to be proven for Trump to be convicted of a felony?maineman » 31 May 2024, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ As I understand it, the FEC crime did not need to be specifically proven... there were four possible crimes that the jury had to choose from and they didn't even need to all choose the same one. Don't like it? Move to New York, run for the legislature, and if you win, you can submit a bill that will change the law so that it is more to your liking... until then you should probably call the waaambulance, Doctor Bees.
maineman » 31 May 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ if it's written with the same lack of legal finesse as his defense team exhibited in the trial, it should be good for a laugh, anyway.