Huey » 31 May 2024, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you see he raised almost 35 million in 6 hours? Did you that 30% of those people have never donated to him before?
Point being is people see this as the sham it is. Oh, he is found guilty. But people will not care.
Clinton has a YUGE cash advantage, and Trump spent around half of what she did.maineman » 31 May 2024, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑ some people are upset. some people are overjoyed. Biden still has a YUGE cash advantage over him and now he can campaign against a convicted FELON.
Nobody has ever doubted the hypnotic hold Trump holds over the MAGA base. I know I certainly have not. If the MAGA base is even MORE incensed by the court decision that may make them give more money to his cause, but it will not cause them to magically clone themselves and become MORE people.
Lots of polling for months now has shown that Trump's support amongst the folks in the middle is soft at best, and that a felony conviction would drive many of them away.
Biden is gonna live in PA, MI, WI, and AZ and his message is going to be about Dobbs, and Felonious Don.
I realize you disagree, and that's cool. One of us will be dancing on election night and the other will be crying in his beer. And then, the next day, life will go on and we'll both find some other issue to occupy our time.
Huey » 31 May 2024, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Clinton has a YUGE cash advantage, and Trump spent around half of what she did.
We all know what happened.
After the last election, life didn't go on and many of the morons that were dancing are now working 2 jobs to keep their head above water, have been priced out of the housing market, and continue to watch prices spiraling upward.maineman » 31 May 2024, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑
I realize you disagree, and that's cool. One of us will be dancing on election night and the other will be crying in his beer. And then, the next day, life will go on and we'll both find some other issue to occupy our time.
maineman » 31 May 2024, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ she wasn't a convicted felon.
Like I said. neither of us has a time machine. We'll both have to sit and wait to see what happens. For my money, I like Joe's chances a lot better when he's running against a 34 times convicted felon. YMMV
maineman » 31 May 2024, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ are you talking about taking them out by voting them out of office, or are you advocating homicide?
maineman » 31 May 2024, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ As I understand it, the FEC crime did not need to be specifically proven... there were four possible crimes that the jury had to choose from and they didn't even need to all choose the same one. Don't like it? Move to New York, run for the legislature, and if you win, you can submit a bill that will change the law so that it is more to your liking... until then you should probably call the waaambulance, Doctor Bees.
maineman » 31 May 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Nobody's shoved anything up my *** since my last colonoscopy. And you certainly don't have the balls or the ability to do so, Doctor Bees. You're just a flaming interwebz gasbag.... but BOY, aren't you good for a laugh every now and then?
GRAB'EM BY THE ******! Got him electedmaineman » 31 May 2024, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ she wasn't a convicted felon.
Like I said. neither of us has a time machine. We'll both have to sit and wait to see what happens. For my money, I like Joe's chances a lot better when he's running against a 34 times convicted felon. YMMV
RebelGator » 31 May 2024, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ After the last election, life didn't go on and many of the morons that were dancing are now working 2 jobs to keep their head above water, have been priced out of the housing market, and continue to watch prices spiraling upward.
PEANUT IN PAJAMAS
Beekeeper » 31 May 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑ In order to have a CRIME, you have to have a CONVICTION OF THAT CRIME!! And no evidence was presented to PROVE an FEC VIOLATION OR crime was committed. Add to that, the STATES have ZERO jurisdiction to prosecute ANY FEC violation. AND ADDITIONALLY, the SDNY FEDS found ZERO evidence that Trump committed ANY CRIME relating to FEC violations in the NDA!! So why did MERCHAN REFUSE TO HEAR THAT IN TESTIMONY??
So you have A **** RIGGED JURY, IN A RIGGED TRIAL, AND A PARTISAN HACK JUDGE THAT ORCHESTRATED YOUR "conviction" PERFECTLY to order. IT WAS A **** SHAM TRIAL ONLY BANANA REPUBLICS AND NY STATE DEMOCRAT NAZIS CAN PULL OFF!!
Beekeeper » 31 May 2024, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑ You.ve been warned!!! DON'T COME DOWN THIS WAY or you're going to have more than a BOOT SHOVED UP YOUR ***, DICKFACE!!
And if you want to test if I have the balls for it, come on down, YOU'RE THE NEXT CONTESTANT!! ANYTIME you need a place to go, let us know, CHICKEN ****!!! You put me on IGNORE because of your COWARICE AND **** MENTALITY, *******!! I've seen worhtless cowardly FAT *** PIECE OF NAZI **** LIKE YOU MORE THAN YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. NONE of them want to see my pretty face again!!
You seem to be thinking you are such a "tough guy, now's your chance to PROVE IT!!
Biden and his masters are so afraid that he will lose…..it’s obvious and shameful in such a real way. sic….
maineman » 31 May 2024, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑ actually, the NY law does not require a conviction on the underlying crime.
the jury wasn't rigged and the trial wasn't rigged.
Guilty.
Heard a good one yesterday, for every crime an illegal commits, charge Biden as an accomplice!sootedupCyndi » 31 May 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ i hate to say it. Eye for and eye toof for a toof. That's the only way these idiots will stop!
and Oh Boy theres plenty pickens there-
Beekeeper » 31 May 2024, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑ It REQUIRES A CRIME and NONE was proven ****!!!
You need TESTIMONY and EVIDENCE of a CRIME, and you had NONE PRESENTED OF ANY UNDERLYING CRIME!! NONE!! NADA!!! ZERO!!!
Hell, there wasn't even any mention of what the UNDERLYING CRIME WAS IN THE INDICTMENT and NY STATE LAW IS TRUMPED BY THE 6th AMENDMENT ON THAT ONE POINT ALONE, ******* MORON PIECE OF NAZI ****!!!
How much do you need your *** KICKED BEFORE YOU UNDERSTANT THAT ONESIMPLE POINT???