You respond with a question...
Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑You respond with a question...
The rapist felon.
*Huey » 31 May 2024, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑It certainly is epic. The dems may have guaranteed trump will will be.Blackvegetable » 30 May 2024, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ For those who are unaware:
Being the unrepentant toady that he is, @Huey would greet the news of each Grifty indictment with
"Get back to me when you have convictions,"
We've got 34 of them now..
This is gonna be epic...
And why do you presume to think I would allow a proven **** to speak for me? lmao!
Do you recall what you said AFTER 34 felonies?
Run..*Huey » 15 Jun 2025, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ Don't really care, Runny.....make your own point. I am no longer do that for you.
you just did.make your own point. I am no longer do that for you.
Can you tell everyone why you voted for Dr. Jill Stein?
Keep running.Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2025, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ Can you tell everyone why you voted for Dr. Jill Stein?
Again you accuse me of running, while running.
Yup, it sure has. When I posted that the M&P 15-22 your immediate answer was it should be banned. That was dumb.Blackvegetable » 31 May 2024, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑Huey » 31 May 2024, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ You tell me. That is your gig. Also, you m ay post what section of that website the AR 15 is listed.
I did kick your *** when you told this weapon should be banned because it was military:
I was proving the point that you gunophobe idiots want firearms banned based on appearance. Not function. You want banned because of external plastic/metal pieces that make it look scary.
Now, I will be picking this up tomorrow:
Should that be banned?this has NEVER happened...I was proving the point that you gunophobe idiots want firearms banned based on appearance.
Ever.
You are proving an assertion by re-asserting it?*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ Yup, it sure has. When I posted that the M&P 15-22 your immediate answer was it should be banned. That was dumb.
I believe it is one of the sections of the citation which begins as followsThat is your gig. Also, you m ay post what section of that website the AR 15 is listed
I am quite sure it does.Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑You are proving an assertion by re-asserting it?*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ Yup, it sure has. When I posted that the M&P 15-22 your immediate answer was it should be banned. That was dumb.I believe it is one of the sections of the citation which begins as followsThat is your gig. Also, you m ay post what section of that website the AR 15 is listed
"This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design...."
But no one except you is talking, or even retelling, about that....*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ I am quite sure it does.
And the pictured M7P 15-22 is not on the list.
Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑But no one except you is talking, or even retelling, about that....*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ I am quite sure it does.
And the pictured M7P 15-22 is not on the list.
You're not having much luck..
:rofl:Blackvegetable » 31 May 2024, 5:40 am » wrote: ↑ What's the O/U on how long Toady of the 2ndBesty will be pouting?