Liberal Forum

By allowing the jurors to effectively choose from a menu of potential predicate crimes behind the alleged falsified business records, rather than requiring unanimity on a single offense, Judge Merchan has lowered the prosecutorial hurdle.


Judge Merchan Issues Last-Minute Jury Instruction Designed to Convict Trump, Even if Jurors Don't Agree (msn.com)


MAKING YOUR OWN SET OF RULES 

Here comes the flood of ****.

Bidencrimefamily » 30 May 2024, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 7:08 pm

Here comes the flood of ****.

LEFTIST PAID ****
 

Bidencrimefamily » 30 May 2024, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 7:08 pm

Here comes the flood of ****.

 
 

righteous » 30 May 2024, 7:13 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 7:13 pm

LEFTIST PAID ****

Let's roll put the ****. 

It's time to fool the masses. 
 

Bidencrimefamily » 30 May 2024, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 7:14 pm

Let's roll put the ****. 

It's time to fool the masses.

Even though the jury did convict him, there are still real legal issues that Trump will bring up on appeal. There may, for instance, be some question as to whether prosecutors can use the violation of a federal law to show actions by “unlawful means” under the New York state la
 

Bidencrimefamily » 30 May 2024, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 7:14 pm

Let's roll put the ****. 

It's time to fool the masses.

IT'S TIME YOUR BOYFRIEND HAS HIS WAY WITH YOUR LOVE CANAL
 
 

righteous » 30 May 2024, 7:26 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 7:26 pm

IT'S TIME YOUR BOYFRIEND HAS HIS WAY WITH YOUR LOVE CANAL

Don't let the truth stand in your way. 

Your orange jesus doesnt. 
 

Bidencrimefamily » 30 May 2024, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 7:29 pm

Don't let the truth stand in your way. 

Your orange jesus doesnt.

I PROMISE NOT TO TALK ABOUT YOUR SALACIOUS ESCAPADES
 

He said that there's no need to agree on what has occurred. "They can disagree on what the crime was, among the three choices. Thus, this means that they could split 4-4-4 and the judge would still treat them unanimously."
 

righteous » 30 May 2024, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 7:05 pm

By allowing the jurors to effectively choose from a menu of potential predicate crimes behind the alleged falsified business records, rather than requiring unanimity on a single offense, Judge Merchan has lowered the prosecutorial hurdle.

Judge Merchan Issues Last-Minute Jury Instruction Designed to Convict Trump, Even if Jurors Don't Agree (msn.com)

MAKING YOUR OWN SET OF RULES

Cohen went to jail for one of them...


 

Bidencrimefamily » 30 May 2024, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 7:29 pm

Don't let the truth stand in your way. 

Your orange jesus doesnt.

@GHETTO BLASTER  finds your obsession revealing.

He'd like to talk to you about it.

 

righteous » 30 May 2024, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 7:05 pm

By allowing the jurors to effectively choose from a menu of potential predicate crimes behind the alleged falsified business records, rather than requiring unanimity on a single offense, Judge Merchan has lowered the prosecutorial hurdle.

Judge Merchan Issues Last-Minute Jury Instruction Designed to Convict Trump, Even if Jurors Don't Agree (msn.com)

MAKING YOUR OWN SET OF RULES

From what I understand, the ONLY thing that makes these charges felonies was if they were perpetrated to cover up "another crime"... and Merchan told the jury that it didn't matter if they agreed on what that "other" crime was, but only that the fraud occured in the first place.

Braggs lack of specificity of what the "other crime" actually was and Merchan's last minute instructions to the jury that the "other crime" was irrelevant, effectly means that Trump was just convicted of 34 misdemeanors... and not 34 felonies.

For reference...

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

 A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

This is exactly what the majority of the legal pundits have been saying for weeks too... and that this is why Bragg looks like a dunce.
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 30 May 2024, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 8:02 pm

@GHETTO BLASTER  finds your obsession revealing.

He'd like to talk to you about it.

https://wltreport.com/2024/01/27/expose ... d-six-men/
EXPOSED: E. Jean Carroll Has Accused SIX Men Of Sexual Assault and/or Rape — Including Former CEO of CBS

This woman is not just a professional story teller but also a 6 time victim of "rape"

GHETTOBLASTER » 30 May 2024, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 8:06 pm

https://wltreport.com/2024/01/27/expose ... d-six-men/
EXPOSED: E. Jean Carroll Has Accused SIX Men Of Sexual Assault and/or Rape — Including Former CEO of CBS

This woman is not just a professional story teller but also a 6 time victim of "rape"

E. Jean Carroll is a mental case, yet her word was considered golden... while Tara Reade who is a very credible and sane woman was immediately dismissed because of who it was she was accusing.

And they say there isn't a two tiered "justice" system.

https://i.postimg.cc/MZ34HSYg/tara-Read ... 565968.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/fT6r7fpK/230119103 ... 072121.jpg
 

righteous » 30 May 2024, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 7:25 pm

Even though the jury did convict him, there are still real legal issues that Trump will bring up on appeal. There may, for instance, be some question as to whether prosecutors can use the violation of a federal law to show actions by “unlawful means” under the New York state la

remind us where you graduated from law school, counselor?  

Blackvegetable » 30 May 2024, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 8:01 pm

Cohen went to jail for one of them...

USING HIS OWN MONEY TO PAY FOR A PROSTITUTE
       
 

maineman » 30 May 2024, 8:23 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 8:23 pm

remind us where you graduated from law school, counselor?

REMIND US OF THE MANY TOILET BOWLS YOU SHINED FOR THE GOOD OF A NEW GENERATION
     
 

*rippy38 » 30 May 2024, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 8:05 pm

From what I understand, the ONLY thing that makes these charges felonies was if they were perpetrated to cover up "another crime"... and Merchan told the jury that it didn't matter if they agreed on what that "other" crime was, but only that the fraud occured in the first place.

Braggs lack of specificity of what the "other crime" actually was and Merchan's last minute instructions to the jury that the "other crime" was irrelevant, effectly means that Trump was just convicted of 34 misdemeanors... and not 34 felonies.

For reference...

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

 A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

This is exactly what the majority of the legal pundits have been saying for weeks too... and that this is why Bragg looks like a dunce.

NO PROOF OF INTENT, NO FEDERAL CRIME. IF THERE WAS ANYTHING IT WOULD BE A MISDEMEANOR.
THE WORK OF A LEFTIST JUDGE THROWING **** ON THE WALL LIKE STORMYS TESTIMONY TO SWAY AN ALREADY LEFTIST AND DECIDED JURY
 

righteous » 30 May 2024, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑

30 May 2024, 8:31 pm

REMIND US OF THE MANY TOILET BOWLS YOU SHINED FOR THE GOOD OF A NEW GENERATION
 

nice dodge.  law school?  nothing?  I didn't think so.  My guess, maybe a fry guy at McDonalds or a payroll clerk for BestBuy?