10% saying it makes them less likely and 35% saying it makes them more likely, is a win for the more likelys.BuckNaked » 01 Jun 2024, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ It’s falling into joes lap
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... t-him-poll
If the roles were reversed would [[[CNN or MSNBC]]] run a pre-election story like this...?BuckNaked » 01 Jun 2024, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ It’s falling into joes lap
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... t-him-poll
No they would notGHETTOBLASTER » 01 Jun 2024, 5:53 pm » wrote: ↑ If the roles were reversed would [[[CNN or MSNBC]]] run a pre-election story like this...?
Let's face it....[[[FOX NEWS]]] is nothing more than "Jew World Order Lite"
Most Republicans are not supporters of criminal activity.BuckNaked » 01 Jun 2024, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ It’s falling into joes lap
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... t-him-poll
Oh yeah baby. Criminals support TrumpBuckNaked » 01 Jun 2024, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ It’s falling into joes lap
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... t-him-poll
You calling people trolls is almost as ironic as you calling people liars.Bidencrimefamily » 01 Jun 2024, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Most Republicans are not supporters of criminal activity.
Unlike the trolls here.
You have dumb Republicans that no matter what Trump does will support himBuckNaked » 01 Jun 2024, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ It’s falling into joes lap
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... t-him-poll
Yes it is. Republicans are not bad people..BuckNaked » 01 Jun 2024, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ It’s falling into joes lap
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... t-him-poll
*******,*rippy38 » 01 Jun 2024, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑ 10% saying it makes them less likely and 35% saying it makes them more likely, is a win for the more likelys.
LOL
Trippie, please...*rippy38 » 01 Jun 2024, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You calling people trolls is almost as ironic as you calling people liars.
LOL
35% "more likely" outweighs the 10% "less likely" by 25%...Blackvegetable » 02 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ *******,
Grifty needs to hold nearly every republican....
10% checking out is NOT made up for by an increase in "more likely".
There's no "replacement"...the population is fixed.*rippy38 » 02 Jun 2024, 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑ 35% "more likely" outweighs the 10% "less likely" by 25%...
Did you even read the article?
Oh wait...
Nevermind
From the story...Blackvegetable » 02 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ *******,
Grifty needs to hold nearly every republican....
10% checking out is NOT made up for by an increase in "more likely".
You fail to understand...*rippy38 » 02 Jun 2024, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑ From the story...
"One in 10 registered GOP voters said Trump's felony conviction for falsifying business records would make them less likely to support him"
That's 10%.
follow along now...
... in the next paragraph, the follow up reads...
"35% said they were even more likely to support Trump"
Today's lesson teaches us that 35 is more than 10 by.... 25.
nod
Does the word "likely" mean their minds are made up?Blackvegetable » 02 Jun 2024, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑ You fail to understand...
You have a fixed population of republicans. Grifty needs 100%, or very close to it. Republicans moving from "likely" to "more likely" don't help him at all....if the population has been reduced by 10%.
Reading this crap is a waste of time.*rippy38 » 02 Jun 2024, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Does the word "likely" mean their minds are made up?
How many of Biden's 100% has walked away from his old ***?
The poll also didn't count the former Biden supporters from 2020 that are going to vote MAGA because the figured out that the Great Senile One is full of ****.
I would be willing to bet you a nice bottle of Scotch that they make up at least if not more than the 10% "less likely" in the story.
You need to stop existing in absolutes dude. The grey is where **** happens.
I accept your concession.