Stfu you leftist ***.
Beekeeper » 03 Jun 2024, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ Coming from someone who believes you DO NOT have to find UNANIMOUS GUILT in criminal court to convict someone, that sounds pretty normal from you. NOR do you believe that a jury must find that a CRIME was actually committed to CONVICT, only that they "believe" one happened and they don't have to tell you what that CRIME WAS!! NOR does the State have to PROVE BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT that a crime was committed!!
Yeah, you should want to "move on".
*** and pussies.
Ancestries falsify evolving in plain sight from how living was to why believe life isn't self evident as the consequences for standing on equal time instead of equal grounds by social consensus of we, they, them, those people believe life must exceed adapting as displaced in ever changing form arrived one's unique fertilized cell on the specific rotation of the planet their time began like nothing ever existed before or since the specific event of each ancestor living this rotation of the planet never same total sum achieved details again.maineman » 03 Jun 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ I do not believe that at all. And the Trump jury was unanimous in their 34 findings that Trump was guilty of fraudulently falsifying business records.
There was ZERO evidence presented or testimony given that supported that an UNDERLYING CRIME ever occurred. ONLY inferences that one MIGHT have occurred and the jury was left to decide which one, if any. THAT alone is a total 6th Amendment violation since the DEFENSE had no clue what kind of case they could fight NOR were they given any opportunity to call witnesses to PROVE OTHERWISE.BuckNaked » 03 Jun 2024, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ and the crime is a federal one and it was a state court WTF over?
maineman » 03 Jun 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ None of those definitions are discussed in the diary.
And, the first time you kick my ***, I'll be certain to let you know. Keep hope alive, Doctor Bees!
Preach it brothaBeekeeper » 03 Jun 2024, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑ There was ZERO evidence presented or testimony given that supported that an UNDERLYING CRIME ever occurred. ONLY inferences that one MIGHT have occurred and the jury was left to decide which one, if any. THAT alone is a total 6th Amendment violation since the DEFENSE had no clue what kind of case they could fight NOR were they given any opportunity to call witnesses to PROVE OTHERWISE.
A Federal law is not something a state has any jurisdiction over in ANY court.
maineman » 03 Jun 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ a couple of points:
1. The diary entry never mentions her age.
2. The diary entry does not say that his presence was "unwanted."
3. You'd be wise to keep my daughter out of this discussion, Doctor Bees.
Then eat her puss instead.maineman » 03 Jun 2024, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ If there were a merit badge for banging a chick who looked as hot as a porn star, I'd agree with you. Who wants to **** some slut that scores and scores of other men have already ****? Sloppy seconds are bad enough; Sloppy thousandths are nauseating.
Beekeeper » 03 Jun 2024, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑ So, you NEVER quit molesting your daughter, huh?? Does she come home on the weekends still to get her "special daddy back wash"??
Never doubted that for ONE SECOND!!
Oh, and the DIARY DOES mention her AGE as being NEAR A TEENAGER in earlier passages, so there is that. And the LAW doesn't say it has to be "unwanted" as the ACT ITSELF is a CRIME!! You seem to forget she left home at age 18 to attend the University of Penn. So it happened LONG before that, dicksuck.
Damn, son, you are batting MINUS 238 here.
Keep SPINNING AND DEFENDING THE INDEFENSABLE, ****!!maineman » 03 Jun 2024, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ The diary also talked about having casual sex with friends. Are you suggesting that entry also refers to events that took place when she was eleven?
Simply standing in a shower with someone is not molestation. There is not even confirmation that either of them was totally undressed.
And batting averages are never negative. The worst is 000. My guess is that you weren't athletic in school, and your nerdiness just got worse as you went through puberty. I certainly think that when you finally do make it through it, you might gain some degree of maturity and leave the schoolyard taunts behind.
maineman » 03 Jun 2024, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ The diary also talked about having casual sex with friends. Are you suggesting that entry also refers to events that took place when she was eleven?
Simply standing in a shower with someone is not molestation. There is not even confirmation that either of them was totally undressed.
And batting averages are never negative. The worst is 000. My guess is that you weren't athletic in school, and your nerdiness just got worse as you went through puberty. I certainly think that when you finally do make it through it, you might gain some degree of maturity and leave the schoolyard taunts behind.
all you got is juvenile trash talk. fair warning. ramp up your game or we'll go back to not interacting.Beekeeper » 03 Jun 2024, 5:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep SPINNING AND DEFENDING THE INDEFENSABLE, ****!!
That DEMOCRAT NAZI DICK HANGING OUT OF YOUR MOUTH is soooooo you!!
Don't waste your time he's in the denial stage of grief.Beekeeper » 03 Jun 2024, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑ HER OWN WORDS, ASSHOLE ****!!
https://archive.ph/olt8W/1e31d20197a408 ... 4446f2.jpg
maineman » 03 Jun 2024, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑ all you got is juvenile trash talk. fair warning. ramp up your game or we'll go back to not interacting.
Can you dispute any of my points?
and in between those two red circled words are a whole bunch of memoriesBeekeeper » 03 Jun 2024, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑ HER OWN WORDS, ASSHOLE ****!!
https://archive.ph/olt8W/1e31d20197a408 ... 4446f2.jpg
It's unreal how conditioned they are.maineman » 03 Jun 2024, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ and in between those two red circled words are a whole bunch of memories
Was I molested..I think so. I cannot remember specifics (of the molestation, obviously) I do remember trauma... I remember not liking the Woolzack's house... I remember somewhat being sexualized with Caroline. I remember having sex with friends at a young age; (SEMICOLON...NEW THOUGHT) showers w/my dad (probably not appropriate)
That is a stream of consciousness and clearly disconnected, discrete thoughts. To say that the very first phrase refers somehow to the very last one is absurd. What happened to the Woolzacks? what happened with Caroline? What about that sex with friends at a young age? Do you really think that Ashley Biden was having sex with friends at the age of 11????
Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2024, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑ It's unreal how conditioned they are.
Stormy recounts under oath that Grifty did the deed with her....Grifty paid 130k to buy her story and spike it...Grifty denied nothing under oath.
MAGAts insist that Grifty was being blackmailed...