Liberal Forum

maineman » 04 Jun 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 8:40 am

she was very small.  I was wearing my swim suit.  She was hysterical and had several leeches on her.  I took her into the shower to clean her off.

If you persist in slandering me and insulting my daughter, this conversation is over.  Is that clear?

Oh, so you mean your "guilty until proven innocent" STANDARD you set for anyone ELSE on the RIGHT doesn't apply to you??

Or is it the one where you DON'T NEED TO PROVE GUILT in order to convict someone of a crime. You know, that PEDOPHILIA CRIME you claim you didn't commit!! But you DO admit you showered with your daughter!! There's that. AND we also know that PEDOPHILES go to great lengths to cover up and DENY their crimes.

It must really SUCK when we go down that PATH you use for EVERYONE but the LWNJs, ESPECIALLY when that PATH APPLIES TO YOU, huh, ****???

maineman » 04 Jun 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 8:34 am

where did I say "fully dressed", Doctor Bees?

YOU claim that you showered with your DAUGHTER "in a bathing suit", so that's NOT to be considered "fully dressed"??? Then that can ONLY mean one thing- you committed a CRIME!!

Oh the tangled WEB YOU WEAVE when your goal IS TO DECEIVE!! That must really SUCK for you, that you spun one you can't detangle from!!

         
 

maineman » 04 Jun 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 9:40 am

that quote is fake and those words do not appear anywhere in her diary.

Do you care to also defend your hero against the statements made by Biden's rape victim Tara Reade?:

In a March 25, 2020, interview with Katie Halper, Tara Reade alleged that Biden had pushed her against a wall, kissed her, put his hand under her skirt, penetrated her with his fingers, and asked, "Do you want to go somewhere else?" Reade told NPR for an April 19 article, "His hands went underneath my clothing and he was touching me in my private areas and without my consent." Reade told The New York Times for an April 12 article that when she pulled away from Biden, he looked puzzled and said, "Come on, man, I heard you liked me." She then said he told her "You're nothing to me, nothing," followed by "You're OK, you're fine."

Go ahead and try!  In for a penny, in for a pound, no?
 

Zeets2 » 04 Jun 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 11:15 am

Do you care to also defend your hero against the statements made by Biden's rape victim Tara Reade?:

Go ahead and try!  In for a penny, in for a pound, no?

So…I take it you agree that the “shower late at night” quote is fake?

Beekeeper » 04 Jun 2024, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 11:01 am

YOU claim that you showered with your DAUGHTER "in a bathing suit", so that's NOT to be considered "fully dressed"??? Then that can ONLY mean one thing- you committed a CRIME!!

Oh the tangled WEB YOU WEAVE when your goal IS TO DECEIVE!! That must really SUCK for you, that you spun one you can't detangle from!!

       

You exhibit the logical acuity of a stalk of asparagus.  I explained what happened to my daughter.  If you persist in slandering me and dishonoring her our conversations will end once again.  Fair warning.  Move away.  I’m serious.

maineman » 04 Jun 2024, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 12:03 pm

So…I take it you agree that the “shower late at night” quote is fake?

Probably.
But how come you're unable to likewise disprove the statements of Tara Reade, who IS a victim of Biden's rape attempt?
And where is the DOJ or FBI examination of those claims similar to the way they treated Trump's accuser?
 

Zeets2 » 04 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm

Probably.
But how come you're unable to likewise disprove the statements of Tara Reade, who IS a victim of Biden's rape attempt?
And where is the DOJ or FBI examination of those claims similar to the way they treated Trump's accuser?

Disprove an unsubstantiated allegation that has been denied and there is no other corroborating evidence?  How would you suggest I go about doing that?
 

maineman » 04 Jun 2024, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 12:08 pm

You exhibit the logical acuity of a stalk of asparagus.  I explained what happened to my daughter.  If you persist in slandering me and dishonoring her our conversations will end once again.  Fair warning.  Move away.  I’m serious.

was that the blood sucker incident? lol- one reason i never swim in a lake up here.       
 

sootedupCyndi » 04 Jun 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 12:24 pm

was that the blood sucker incident? lol- one reason i never swim in a lake up here.     

It was.
 

maineman » 04 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm

It was.

cant you pour salt on them.? ewww
 

Zeets2 » 04 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm

And where is the DOJ or FBI examination of those claims similar to the way they treated Trump's accuser?

Perhaps Biden’s DOJ and FBI have been busy building cases against Democratic Senator Menendez and the president’s son?
 

sootedupCyndi » 04 Jun 2024, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 12:26 pm

cant you pour salt on them.? ewww

She was all muddy too, and was hysterical.  I used tweezers.  Quite the scene up at our camp!  

maineman » 04 Jun 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 12:33 pm

She was all muddy too, and was hysterical.  I used tweezers.  Quite the scene up at our camp!

bob just told me- his kids would get them. he said light a match to them- beer kills those orange slugs.
 

maineman » 04 Jun 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 12:24 pm

Disprove an unsubstantiated allegation that has been denied and there is no other corroborating evidence?  How would you suggest I go about doing that?

Apply the same metrics you used with Trump, you had no trouble then.

RebelGator » 04 Jun 2024, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 12:57 pm

Apply the same metrics you used with Trump, you had no trouble then.

What unsubstantiated allegation concerning Trump did I disprove, Cletis?
 

MM's daughter is a soros funded ada

maineman » 04 Jun 2024, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 1:01 pm

What unsubstantiated allegation concerning Trump did I disprove, Cletis?

You didn't disprove, you embraced. 

maineman » 04 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm

Perhaps Biden’s DOJ and FBI have been busy building cases against Democratic Senator Menendez and the president’s son?

Oh really?  
And that, I suppose, has been going on for the past 4 years since Tara Reade first reported the crime, genius?
But remember, you'd better not DARE acknowledge the crime or you'll be thrown out of the "Blind Biden Defenders" club!:

Court doc from 1996 confirms Tara Reade told of sexual harassment in Biden’s office
By Tamar Lapin May 7, 2020

Tara Reade told her ex-husband that she was sexually harassed while working as an aide for Joe Biden in 1993, it was revealed in a newly-released court document on Thursday.The document, a decades-old court filing obtained by The Tribune in San Luis Obispo, California, was written by Theodore Dronen in 1996, when he and Reade were going through their divorce.“On several occasions [Reade] related a problem she was having at work regarding sexual harassment, in U.S. Senator Joe Biden’s office,” the declaration states.

Any other idiotic excuses you have handy for the refusal of the corrupt DOJ to hold a formal investigation of the crime?
What happened to the "me too" theory that "ALL women accusing someone of rape should be believed"?

Joe Biden assault claim: What does 'believe women' mean now?

12 May 2020
By Holly Honderich,BBC News, Washington

The debate over what it means to "believe women" - the rallying cry of the #MeToo movement - has escalated in recent weeks over a sexual assault allegation lodged against Joe Biden.The accusation by a former staff assistant, Tara Reade, raises uncomfortable questions for Democratic voters who previously said women's complaints should be listened to and treated as credible.It also means that both presidential candidates have been accused of - and denied - sexual assault.

Or do you care to admit to the double standard you apparently swore an oath to uphold regarding ONLY allegations made against Trump and do not apply to Biden?
 
 
 

Zeets2 » 04 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm

Oh really?  
And that, I suppose, has been going on for the past 4 years since Tara Reade first reported the crime, genius?
But remember, you'd better not DARE acknowledge the crime or you'll be thrown out of the "Blind Biden Defenders" club!:

Any other idiotic excuses you have handy for the refusal of the corrupt DOJ to hold a formal investigation of the crime?
What happened to the "me too" theory that "ALL women accusing someone of rape should be believed"?

Or do you care to admit to the double standard you apparently swore an oath to uphold regarding ONLY allegations made against Trump and do not apply to Biden?

All Bullzeet, all day..

 

Zeets2 » 04 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm

Oh really?  
And that, I suppose, has been going on for the past 4 years since Tara Reade first reported the crime, genius?
But remember, you'd better not DARE acknowledge the crime or you'll be thrown out of the "Blind Biden Defenders" club!:

Any other idiotic excuses you have handy for the refusal of the corrupt DOJ to hold a formal investigation of the crime?
What happened to the "me too" theory that "ALL women accusing someone of rape should be believed"?

Or do you care to admit to the double standard you apparently swore an oath to uphold regarding ONLY allegations made against Trump and do not apply to Biden?

It seems like she first reported the crime decades ago.

I have never espoused your so called “me too theory” and if you want to know why the DOJ is not looking into the decades old allegation, I suggest you ask them.  Why in the world would you think I would know anything about it?


And I never swore any oath concerning allegations made against either Trump or Biden.