Grifty wasn't charged with banging a porn star, or lying about it.Vegas » 02 Jun 2024, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ I could have sworn that there was a dimocrat president that was caught under a similar circumstance, and then lied about it under oath...who was that? Something that had to do with an intern and a cum stained dress...ehhhh. I don't know. Let's focus on Trump because dimocrats get a pass on this kind of **** anyway.
To twist your nipples and piss in your Cheerios.
You don't believe he **** her, Ruby..*rippy38 » 02 Jun 2024, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑ To twist your nipples and piss in your Cheerios.
How am I doin'?
Actually, I don't know either way... and neither do you.
I do...*rippy38 » 02 Jun 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Actually, I don't know either way... and neither do you.
He said he didn't, she said he did... after she said he didn't.
What a quandary huh?
Sure... and people don't lie under oath...ever.
Does Grifty lie?*rippy38 » 02 Jun 2024, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure... and people don't lie under oath...ever.
Just ask Mikey Cohen.
Everybody lies... even you.
Answer the question, ******.
Did I say no?
Did you answer the question?
You think evidence of child abuse is boring/funny? What on Earth has happened to Democrats?maineman » 02 Jun 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ For the love of God, give that crumpled horse corpse a rest!
JustinSane » 02 Jun 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ You think evidence of child abuse is boring/funny? What on Earth has happened to Democrats?
Which aspect of those two very simple sentences are you failing to comprehend?
JustinSane » 02 Jun 2024, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Which aspect of those two very simple sentences are you failing to comprehend?
You abused your daughtermaineman » 02 Jun 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I can't understand why you would ask the first one. I have never said or implied that evidence of child abuse is boring or funny. Clearly, the one with reading comprehension issues is YOU. Now run along. I am done with you.
I asked the first one because in response to OP's post you put the followingmaineman » 02 Jun 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I can't understand why you would ask the first one. I have never said or implied that evidence of child abuse is boring or funny. Clearly, the one with reading comprehension issues is YOU. Now run along. I am done with you.
'JustinSane » 02 Jun 2024, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I asked the first one because in response to OP's post you put the following
' For the love of God, give that crumpled horse corpse a rest!'
Evidence of this molestation exits in what has been confirmed as being her diary. How is my question unreasonable?