He isn't going to trial - not on his crimes. He is going to a trial that I could likely win with my internet law degree.Bidencrimefamily » 03 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑
The weird thing is if the doj was corrupt and the justice system then why is hunter going to trial lol;
Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2024, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑ He isn't going to trial - not on his crimes. He is going to a trial that I could likely win with my internet law degree.
One of the primary symptoms of drug addiction is denial. It is a hallmark of addiction that the addict denies he has a problem.
If the DOJ were not corrupt, Hunter would be charged for influence peddling.
Okay - there ya go. **** yourself, simpleton.
DeezerShoove » 03 Jun 2024, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Funny. I just had to simplify my response for BlaVe.
Can these two actually be trolls?!
Yeah you got nothing but MAGA tears.Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2024, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑ He isn't going to trial - not on his crimes. He is going to a trial that I could likely win with my internet law degree.
One of the primary symptoms of drug addiction is denial. It is a hallmark of addiction that the addict denies he has a problem.
If the DOJ were not corrupt, Hunter would be charged for influence peddling.
Okay - there ya go. **** yourself, simpleton.
Why?Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2024, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑ He isn't going to trial - not on his crimes. He is going to a trial that I could likely win with my internet law degree.
One of the primary symptoms of drug addiction is denial. It is a hallmark of addiction that the addict denies he has a problem.
If the DOJ were not corrupt, Hunter would be charged for influence peddling.
Okay - there ya go. **** yourself, simpleton.
Can either possibly be other?DeezerShoove » 03 Jun 2024, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Funny. I just had to simplify my response for BlaVe.
Can these two actually be trolls?!
Funny you would mention syphilis. Democrats injected black men with it and withheld medication in order to study the corpses of people who died of it.Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2024, 5:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Why?
Because turbot....that's why.
Better call Syphilitic Cumbucket.
Liberals are SUCH sheep.Bidencrimefamily » 03 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Wouldnt they have let Biden go on all charges on both cases.
MAGA doesn't have to make sense.
They are just sheeple.
On the republucan plantation.
Your question was answered, punk.Bidencrimefamily » 03 Jun 2024, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah you got nothing but MAGA tears.
Thanks for playing.![]()
It was your version of the truth.Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2024, 8:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Your question was answered, punk.
You don't have to like the answer.
Hunter won't be found guilty. This trial is being held in his backyard.Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2024, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑ He isn't going to trial - not on his crimes. He is going to a trial that I could likely win with my internet law degree.
One of the primary symptoms of drug addiction is denial. It is a hallmark of addiction that the addict denies he has a problem.
If the DOJ were not corrupt, Hunter would be charged for influence peddling.
Okay - there ya go. **** yourself, simpleton.
Self confessed child molester has something to say.golfboy » 03 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Hunter won't be found guilty. This trial is being held in his backyard.
It's why they're gonna flock to Grifty.Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2024, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Funny you would mention syphilis. Democrats injected black men with it and withheld medication in order to study the corpses of people who died of it.
This occurred at the highest levels of both state and federal government - and you worship state power. What a ****-fingered rube you are.
Precisely, fruitcake. And I know the difference between a male toddler and a female toddler - putting me well ahead of you in the realms of reason and sanity and connection to reality.
All your opinion.Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2024, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Precisely, fruitcake. And I know the difference between a male toddler and a female toddler - putting me well ahead of you in the realms of reason and sanity and connection to reality.
You have your version of "the truth" - arising from a level of intellectual profundity that cannot suss gender. I have my version - arising from an intelligence with exponentially better connection to the world of Aristotelean science. Perhaps this is one of those rare occasions wherein the magical thinker who cannot even comprehend basic science is the one who is correct. One doubts it, though. It is highly unlikely.
It was never intended that he be found guilty. This is for show, so that little simps can say, "See? The justice system isn't stacked." Of course it is stacked. They charged him with the very LEAST of his crimes and the very hardest to prove. They completely ignored the influence peddling. They didn't even charge the sex trafficking cases (I consider these equally spurious and difficult to prove), which is a potential charge since he brought multiple prostitutes across state lines in what is technically sex trafficking under the Mann Act..golfboy » 03 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Hunter won't be found guilty. This trial is being held in his backyard.
^*** uses a pronoun without antecedent in a cheap ploy to pretend he responded to his better.
Yes - against yours.
Its a *** and tranny show.Cannonpointer » 03 Jun 2024, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes - against yours.
Let the board decide, fruitcake, whose opinion weighs more.