Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you define Grifty's position on 2020 as being "wrong" or a "lie"?
@BlackvegetableHuey » 07 Jun 2024, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ I said he was wrong about 2020 as well as any number of things. You and Biden? As you are doing here you divert to Trump, Toady.
Strike thru all the irrelevant crap...
Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Strike thru all the irrelevant crap...
Then answer for that.
You demanded I repost your words...Huey » 07 Jun 2024, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm good. You are demanding answer, information, that has already been posted and previously replied to.
Please dial back on your ZeroIntegrity moron.Huey » 07 Jun 2024, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope, that is the second lie you have told today. The first is calming I posted a definition of lying. I didn't. In this instance I said I had already posted something, and I reposted them and asked if they were my words.
But using your logic Biden is always wrong and never lies.Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Please dial back on your ZeroIntegrity moron.
If Grifty's position on 2020 is "wrong", then "lie" has no meaning.
Which you were told.
It is YOUR "logic", you **** idiot.Huey » 07 Jun 2024, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ But using your logic Biden is always wrong and never lies.
Plus, If Trump firmly believed the election was stolen he did not lie. If he knows it wasn't, that would be a lie. Thank you for proving my underlying point. Your my Huckleberry and easily played.
The goal of this exercise was to prove you will ALWAYS divert from Biden's lies and misinformation by using trump.
Huey » 07 Jun 2024, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it is not, Meltdown Mary.
Your claim is Joe does not lie, he is just wrong. I am applying your logic to Trump. Stop lying.
You're lying....already stipulated that he does.Your claim is Joe does not lie,
he is just wrong. I am applying your logic to Trump.
Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ You're lying....already stipulated that he does.
Unbelievable.
Who said Grifty is "wrong" about 2020?
You are.
You can't furnish examples of ANY evidence that wasn't hearsay..so once again please stop playing your endless game of RING AROUND THE ROSEY.Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑ You clearly don't understand the meaning of the word....but Grifty's lawyers do.
Now post an example of hearsay testimony used against Grifty.
None of the admitted testimony was hearsay.GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jun 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ You can't furnish examples of ANY evidence that wasn't hearsay..so once again please stop playing your endless game of RING AROUND THE ROSEY.
You can't furnish examples of ANY evidence that wasn't hearsay..so once again please stop playing your endless game of RING AROUND THE ROSEY.Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ None of the admitted testimony was hearsay.
The testimony of the victim CANNOT, by definition, be "hearsay".
We know you don't understand the meaning of the word.