You can't furnish a single example of any that was.GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jun 2024, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You can't furnish examples of ANY evidence that wasn't hearsay..so once again please stop playing your endless game of RING AROUND THE ROSEY.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024 ... know/"Here are some facts about Carroll’s story that the establishment media do not want the public to know:1. Bergdorf Goodman has no surveillance video of the alleged incident.2. There are zero witnesses to the alleged sexual attack.3. Carroll first came forward — conveniently — with the allegations while promoting her book What Do We Need Men For? in 2019, which featured a list of “The Most Hideous Men of My Life.”4. Carroll was unable to remember when this alleged attack even occurred. She told her lawyer in 2023, “This question, the when, the when, the date, has been something I’ve [been] constantly trying to pin down.” She has jumped years — originally beginning with 1994, then moving to 1995, and even floating to 1996. She cannot remember the season in which the alleged attack occurred either.5. The Donna Karan blazer dress she claims to have worn during the alleged incident was not even available at the time of her claims. Trump Attorney Boris Epshteyn told reporters, “She said, ‘This is the dress I wore in 1994.’ They went back, they checked. The dress wasn’t even made in 1994.”“And that’s why the date’s moved around. This is the 80s. Is it the 90s? Is it the 2000s? President Trump has consistently stated that he was falsely accused, and he has the right to defend himself,” he added.6. She never came forward with these allegations over the years despite constantly being open about sexuality, posting things that were very sexual in nature on social media — many of which Trump has shared. They include remarks such as “How do you know your ‘unwanted sexual advance’ is unwanted, until you advance it?” and “Sex Tip I Learned From My Dog: When in heat, chase the male until he collapses with exhaustion … then jump him!”"Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑ You can't furnish a single example of any that was.
You're stupid.
Ask the jewish lawyer your kids call "Daddy"
Breitbart?GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jun 2024, 5:53 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024 ... know/"Here are some facts about Carroll’s story that the establishment media do not want the public to know:1. Bergdorf Goodman has no surveillance video of the alleged incident.2. There are zero witnesses to the alleged sexual attack.3. Carroll first came forward — conveniently — with the allegations while promoting her book What Do We Need Men For? in 2019, which featured a list of “The Most Hideous Men of My Life.”4. Carroll was unable to remember when this alleged attack even occurred. She told her lawyer in 2023, “This question, the when, the when, the date, has been something I’ve [been] constantly trying to pin down.” She has jumped years — originally beginning with 1994, then moving to 1995, and even floating to 1996. She cannot remember the season in which the alleged attack occurred either.5. The Donna Karan blazer dress she claims to have worn during the alleged incident was not even available at the time of her claims. Trump Attorney Boris Epshteyn told reporters, “She said, ‘This is the dress I wore in 1994.’ They went back, they checked. The dress wasn’t even made in 1994.”“And that’s why the date’s moved around. This is the 80s. Is it the 90s? Is it the 2000s? President Trump has consistently stated that he was falsely accused, and he has the right to defend himself,” he added.6. She never came forward with these allegations over the years despite constantly being open about sexuality, posting things that were very sexual in nature on social media — many of which Trump has shared. They include remarks such as “How do you know your ‘unwanted sexual advance’ is unwanted, until you advance it?” and “Sex Tip I Learned From My Dog: When in heat, chase the male until he collapses with exhaustion … then jump him!”"
So THIS is your attempt at debunking the facts laid out in this article?...https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024 ... -you-know/Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Breitbart?
The coke addict?
I don't see any mention of "hearsay"

Where's the hearsay?GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jun 2024, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑ So THIS is your attempt at debunking the facts laid out in this article?...https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024 ... -you-know/
You have no idea how weak and pathetic you just made yourself look...!
Breitbart isn't even that stupid.GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Everything that she claimed happened without any witnesses is hearsay.
Combined with the other facts previously mentioned make the "he said / she said" claims less than credible hearsay..https://barrarlaw.com/blog/when-he-said ... nvict.html
You're the guy who thinks that ****** have contributed just as much to the advancement of mankind as everyone else...so your opinion as to who is smart and who isn't can't be taken seriously.
GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jun 2024, 11:12 pm » wrote: ↑ You're the guy who thinks that ****** have contributed just as much to the advancement of mankind as everyone else...so your opinion as to who is smart and who isn't can't be taken seriously.
Sorry.
Didn't the woman claim she was raped 6 different times by different men?Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Breitbart?
The coke addict?
I don't see any mention of "hearsay"
All those hours watching FOX and you don't know?BooRadley » 08 Jun 2024, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑ Didn't the woman claim she was raped 6 different times by different men?