please don't, given that you ignored thisConsRule » 07 Jun 2024, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Back to avoiding. I thought there might be hope for you, I was wrong.
That would have been when Trump was president, nitwit!
how do we measure "****"?
What speaks for itself is the fact that idiots like you think you can cherry-pick the numbers you like and ignore the rest!Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ The data speaks for itself...
That's the thing about data.
We KNOW, by ready example, that data is just an M-80 waiting to go off, taped to your face....don't we...
Why go back there.....we see how you respond to it.
I'm not encouraged.
Do you question, for even a minute, that when he's old enough to read this, your grandson will want to grow up to be "like Blackvegetable"?
Probably reported by the business any time an employer gave a dope like you a job!
It is nothing more than your opinion. No reason to respond or even acknowledge. Did you think it was a question?Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ please don't, given that you ignored this
Discussing data with you is enduring your idiocy, trying to get you to recognize your error.
It's mutually debasing.
attaching your bullzeet to numbers doesn't make the bullzeet any less bullzeety.Zeets2 » 07 Jun 2024, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ What speaks for itself is the fact that idiots like you think you can cherry-pick the numbers you like and ignore the rest!
Such as:
Of those 272,000 jobs "created" (which will likely be reduced again by next month's correction):
68,000 of them were in healthcare primarily the cost of additional workers needed to handle the free healthcare given to illegals.
43,000 of them were government jobs increasing the already bloated bureaucracy that contributes NOTHING to the economy.
28,000 of them were added in education, as we're now forced to add a huge number of teachers and administrators to handle the free education of 10 million illegals your idiot has forced taxpayers to pay for.
And 4419 of them were part-time jobs, mostly needed as 2nd or 3rd jobs as gas and food prices continue to rise.
So NOW the data has spoken for itself, a tad different when partisan liberal dopes like you take off your rose-colored glasses!
No...ConsRule » 07 Jun 2024, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ It is nothing more than your opinion. No reason to respond or even acknowledge. Did you think it was a question?
Unfortunately for you and Joe Biden, the only numbers the American people care about is how far they need to stretch that paycheck until the next one comes. Any increase in wages have been destroyed by Joe's inflation.Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Here’s the ‘bad news’ in the ‘good’ jobs report
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/07/economy/ ... index.html
“The good news is we saw the explosion in payrolls. The bad news is the rise in unemployment with an acceleration in wage gains,” Diane Swonk, chief economist with KPMG, told CNN.
You literally don't know a damned thing.Zeets2 » 07 Jun 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Probably reported by the business any time an employer gave a dope like you a job!
Another innumerate shares what he's been told to believe by a guy who thinks $20/hr is "six figures"....Cedar » 07 Jun 2024, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Unfortunately for you and Joe Biden, the only numbers the American people care about is how far they need to stretch that paycheck until the next one comes. Any increase in wages have been destroyed by Joe's inflation.
GIGO.Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Another innumerate shares what he's been told to believe by a guy who thinks $20/hr is "six figures"....
Tell usBlackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Another innumerate shares what he's been told to believe by a guy who thinks $20/hr is "six figures"....
He sure is an idiot.Cedar » 07 Jun 2024, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑ GIGO.
I think the last time I was working for $20/hr was probably around 87-88.
Why do ypu spend so much time listening to an idiot like that?BooRadley » 07 Jun 2024, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Tell us
If things are so great why are house sales at a 28 year low?
Just give us some ideas
Why are housing sales at a 28 year low?Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2024, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do ypu spend so much time listening to an idiot like that?
Yes..BooRadley » 07 Jun 2024, 4:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Why are housing sales at a 28 year low?
Think 7% might be a reason?
To whose tones am I deaf, Slack Jawed Rube?DeezerShoove » 07 Jun 2024, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Your buddy BlaVe doesn't seem to understand that.
He is a typical tone deaf progressive. The "cause" trumps everything...