So the judge has an obligation to report this but Fox has no right to bring it up?Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2024, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you dumb ****.
The judge has an OBLIGATION to report it.
Just as the NYT had an obligation to report the pee tapes...BooRadley » 09 Jun 2024, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑ So he has an obligation to report it....
And Fox doesn't?
Because we had evidence...BooRadley » 09 Jun 2024, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑ And we spent $40 million of taxpayer $$$ on pee tapes and Russian Collusion..?
But that's all right?
Kinda ironic...
Don't ya think
That was paid for by the Clinton camp and the Steele Dossier that our own DOJ was told to ignore the report....Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Just as the NYT had an obligation to report the pee tapes...
….an obligation to give himself a way out of embarrassment for the sham he presided over, with an appeal regarding this stupidity…Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2024, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you dumb ****.
The judge has an OBLIGATION to report it.
He is assigned a case...jefftec » 09 Jun 2024, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ ….an obligation to give himself a way out of embarrassment for the sham he presided over, with an appeal regarding this stupidity…
Focus, ****...BooRadley » 09 Jun 2024, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ That was paid for by the Clinton camp and the Steele Dossier that our own DOJ was told to ignore the report....
$40 million later?
So you laugh at Fox for reporting a Democrat judges report to the Trump lawyers...
But it's okay for the NYT to report that Clinton had paid for a "dossier" that wasted $40 million of tax payer $$$
Has LSDNBC, CNN, NY SLIMES, Washington COMPOST or any OTHER LWNJ media LIED ABOUT ANYTHING? OR EXAGERATED??Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2024, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ No one questions that the judge wrote the letter, you **** imbecile
Has FOX ever exaggerated, or lied about, anything before?
Name all those who have paid 787 million. and the head of TuckTuck, for lying...Beekeeper » 09 Jun 2024, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Has LSDNBC, CNN, NY SLIMES, Washington COMPOST or any OTHER LWNJ media LIED ABOUT ANYTHING? OR EXAGERATED??
Hmmmm. Hunty's laptop, RUSSIAN COLLUSION, or any number of **** CLAIMS that have turned out to be 100% LIES!!
You should clean out the **** from your OWN HOUSE before you start trying to find some inside MINE, ****!!
Oops!!
Mrkelly » 09 Jun 2024, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑indeed Z09 you dumb ****
![]()
he calls himself “a professional **** poster![]()
https://twitter.com/jsweetli/status/1799184582832755062?s=21&t=PUc3B8ggHc1pad3r8FZXXA
Click on the picture of him in the lower right
Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2024, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Name all those who have paid 787 million. and the head of TuckTuck, for lying...
I have no idea if it's a hoax.Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2024, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Focus, ****...
My suspicion is that the tweet is a hoax, and that FOX - whose laughable editorial standards are both the reason you watch as well as for your shame - determined to inflate it for its slack jawed audience, which demands that FOX lie to it.
Nod..
Oh … OKBeekeeper » 09 Jun 2024, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑ WAIT A SECOND!! So now Trannies are NOT TO BE BELEIVED??
Damn son, you sure do crucify your own kind when they do DUMB **** that benefits the RIGHT!!! And you try to denigrate the SOURCE when the odds are, BEFORE that letter by Merchan was written, the NY COURTS have already determined he had a cousin on the jury!! OTHERWISE there would be no letter put forth. Do you think for ONE SECOND that they are going to give Trump a break since HATE for him exceeds any possible break they are willing to give him.
Sucks you think that you have something, when you really have a JURY VERDICT ABOUT TO BE NULLIFIED AND A MISTRIAL DECLARED!!! Merchan is NOT going to want to have his BAD BEHAVIOUR a cause for the verdict to be overturned, and there was MORE than enough of that for a COMPLETE DISMISSAL OFTHE VERDICT AND POSSIBLY THE CASE!!
Do you think it was right for the judge to report it?Mrkelly » 09 Jun 2024, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh … OK
just pointing out that this story has been debunked all over the interwebs
but do carry on
No, its NOT been debunked, but it has been TRIED to be DISCREDITED!! And it has FAILED since the NY Courts have NOT said it was false.Mrkelly » 09 Jun 2024, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh … OK
just pointing out that this story has been debunked all over the interwebs
but do carry on
Legislating from the bench isn't an obligation. It is a personal choice. Justification to create social chaos isn't the same balancing justice as adapt or become extinct equally applied to all reproductions living this rotation. The idea humans have rights is artificial intelligence created by hypothetical scenarios becoming legislated precedence serving ideas life exceeds constantly adapting to the moment since arriving just another fertilized cell chanting population forward each rotation so far.Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2024, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you dumb ****.
The judge has an OBLIGATION to report it.
Need a tissue, Princess?Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2024, 5:28 pm » wrote: ↑ @huey is not only an uninformed lying rube, he's a sui generis coward.