That's from the Getty Archives, ****..*rippy38 » 08 Jun 2024, 5:37 am » wrote: ↑ I have no clue.
Some Studio 54 Cabana boy...
https://i.postimg.cc/tCGwXcLM/unnamed.jpg
It's from the same location and same night as the picture you keep posting.Blackvegetable » 08 Jun 2024, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑ That's from the Getty Archives, ****..
Clearly labeled.
You're a ******.
Yes, there are many photos of Roy Cohn. Here's one with his catamite, Wee Donnie..*rippy38 » 08 Jun 2024, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ It's from the same location and same night as the picture you keep posting.
The two "boys" the picture I posted were co-workers of the one in your pic and were apparently working the party that Cohn was attending, and neither of the three are Donald Trump... no matter how hard you want it to be.
You just keep looking dumber and dumber on this.
I know it's Saturday, but you should definitely call Brown first thing Monday morning and at the least get an apology.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jun 2024, 5:30 am » wrote: ↑ Fondler,
You're a moron.
Hole is from Southie, the Alabama of the North East...
Are they still passing around your SAT answer sheet for yuks, or were you also advised not to bother?*rippy38 » 08 Jun 2024, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ It's from the same location and same night as the picture you keep posting.
The two "boys" the picture I posted were co-workers of the one in your pic and were apparently working the party that Cohn was attending, and neither of the three are Donald Trump... no matter how hard you want it to be.
You just keep looking dumber and dumber on this.
I know it's Saturday, but you should definitely call Brown first thing Monday morning and at the least get an apology.
The guy next to Cohn in your Vanity Fair Society page picture is way to short to be Donnie.Blackvegetable » 08 Jun 2024, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, there are many photos of Roy Cohn. Here's one with his catamite, Wee Donnie..
You can be sure it's Wee Donnie because he's wearing makeup. Wee Donnie makes up his face every day.
To greet his rubes...
You're a **** idiot.Beekeeper » 08 Jun 2024, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑ WTF are you yammering about??
Your little "verdict" is in some DEEP **** and MERCHAN KNEW IT WHEN THE LETTER ADVISING COUNCIL WAS WRITTEN!!! There is no attacking the source on THIS ONE, ASSHOLE since the ACTUAL LETTER FROM MERCHAN is all the FACTS YOU NEED!!
You're a **** DICK SUCKING IDIOT!!
Don't kid yourself, Muffin*rippy38 » 08 Jun 2024, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑ The guy next to Cohn in your Vanity Fair Society page picture is way to short to be Donnie.
Here is a pic from the same time period for comparison...
https://i.postimg.cc/SQdJWfRs/gettyimag ... 12x612.jpg
The guy in your pic doesn't even resemble Donnie either. Nothing matches up... the chin, nose, mouth, eyes... none of it.
First thing Monday, make that call.
I'm not the one kidding myself...Blackvegetable » 08 Jun 2024, 6:18 am » wrote: ↑ Don't kid yourself, Muffin
That's Wee Donnie...Roy, the notorious sodomite is not sissy enough for makeup. But Donnie plasters it on like a Palermo whore...
You clearly are.
You know how all roads lead to Rome?Beekeeper » 08 Jun 2024, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, yeah, yeah. Your yammering on incessantly is all you have.
It must be a PATHETIC LIFE to have nothing but this forum to keep you company. No really, we ALL know that is a FACT. And not to mention....
YOU ARE A CUCKED LITTLE IDIOT that eats out assholes for breakfast!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Find me one other source on the entirety of the internet that claims that's Trump in that picture... just one.Blackvegetable » 08 Jun 2024, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ You clearly are.
Tell us again how Wee Donnie wouldn't know that VF offered that photo and caption.
Circulation 1.25 MILLION.
I don't need to.*rippy38 » 08 Jun 2024, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑ Find me one other source on the entirety of the internet that claims that's Trump in that picture... just one.
And no, the Showercap Blog doesn't count.
You can't, because no other source exists anywhere on the entirety of the Internet... because it's ****.Blackvegetable » 08 Jun 2024, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑ I don't need to.
There is no cause, other than your gay panic, to question the attribution.
Of course you don't need toBlackvegetable » 08 Jun 2024, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑ I don't need to.
There is no cause, other than your gay panic, to question the attribution.
I think Flounder is searching feverishly for a second source to corroborate that Vanity Fair Society page claim he is steadfastly standing by.BooRadley » 08 Jun 2024, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ Of course you don't need to
You just repeat the lies....
How's the pee tape search going?
What lie, ****?BooRadley » 08 Jun 2024, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ Of course you don't need to
You just repeat the lies....
How's the pee tape search going?
Why don't you go ahead and tell us about it.
Consider an editorBeekeeper » 08 Jun 2024, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑ Why don't you go ahead and tell us about it.
OR you could stick to the OP's TOPIC and actually contribute some of your **** AHD NAZISM to the discussion.
Seems your ONLY goal is to derail every topic with your meaningless drivel. Of which you get your *** STOMPED INTO OBLIVION every time you do!!
Seeing how you have NOTHING to offer on this OP's TOPIC, you need to mozy along, CUCKY BOY!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()