They are also referred to as "scene of the crime," "locus of the rape," and "the place where Bob and Frank fell in love."maineman » 12 Jun 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑ The truth is, in the Navy, a ship is NEVER referred to as "the eisenhower." It is either the Dwight D. Eisenhower or the Ike.
The claim is the evidence?Cannonpointer » 12 Jun 2024, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ ****.
The claim is evidence. That's where the whole thing starts.
And the denial is from a trusted source.
Well - trusted by you and trannies and such.
Right. You need a jewish man in a navy dress and his hair in a bun telling the truth.
Keep waiting.
If you are too stupid to understand that a claim is evidence of a thing, I can't make you smarter.*rippy38 » 12 Jun 2024, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑ The claim is the evidence?
What kind of progressive leftist **** is that?
LOL
It could be evidence of a lie, sugar britches.Cannonpointer » 12 Jun 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑ If you are too stupid to understand that a claim is evidence of a thing, I can't make you smarter.
When we enter testimony, it is entered "into evidence," ya *******.
The very first evidence (unless you were in proximity and saw the bang) that the ike got houthie-slapped was the CLAIM.
You're just stupid, rip - and that is NOT MY FAULT. That's your fault.
It absolutely could. No one has said otherwise.
Said the guy who preened that he had the backing of the folks who told us Hunter's laptop was Russian propaganda.
So if I claim you are a *** dicker then that is all the evidence needed to prove you are, indeed, a *** dicker.Cannonpointer » 12 Jun 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑ If you are too stupid to understand that a claim is evidence of a thing, I can't make you smarter.
When we enter testimony, it is entered "into evidence," ya *******.
The very first evidence (unless you were in proximity and saw the bang) that the ike got houthie-slapped was the CLAIM.
You're just stupid, rip - and that is NOT MY FAULT. That's your fault.