Liberal Forum

jerrab » 16 Jun 2024, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 6:06 pm

show one circumstance where bump stocks would be useful.

and don't dodge this question.

Go up to the top of this thread, click on my name in the "view post by" list, and get back to me when your done.

 
 

jerrab » 16 Jun 2024, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 6:06 pm

show one circumstance where bump stocks would be useful.

and don't dodge this question.

You just got done informing us that bump stocks are useful if you happen to be a "FARAWAY SNIPER".....
Was "Faraway Sniper" your MOS...?     
jerrab » Today, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 1:24 pm
you can't refute that a bump stock can be used in a faraway sniper case with no repercussions to the shooter.

Here we have a couple "Faraway Snipers" trading "full bump stock auto" war stories.....
https://youtu.be/a_gjItlGXDo?si=7J6Yg6jlxcZ0vtBe
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Jun 2024, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 6:37 pm

You just got done informing us that bump stocks are useful if you happen to be a "FARAWAY SNIPER".....
Was "Faraway Sniper" your MOS...?     
jerrab » Today, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 1:24 pm
you can't refute that a bump stock can be used in a faraway sniper case with no repercussions to the shooter.

Here we have a couple "Faraway Snipers" trading "full bump stock auto" war stories.....
https://youtu.be/a_gjItlGXDo?si=7J6Yg6jlxcZ0vtBe

do you think mass killings are useful.                                                                      

*rippy38 » 16 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm

Go up to the top of this thread, click on my name in the "view post by" list, and get back to me when your done.

I  go by your last  post

jerrab » 16 Jun 2024, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 7:19 pm

I  go by your last  post

Not my problem.
 

*rippy38 » 16 Jun 2024, 7:30 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 7:30 pm

Not my problem.

don't care

jerrab » 16 Jun 2024, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 7:05 pm

do you think mass killings are useful.                                                                    

jerrab » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
45 minutes ago
you can't refute that a bump stock can be used in a faraway sniper case with no repercussions to the shooter.

A "faraway sniper" in full auto mode...hs/she/it said........   
you have no idea how ridiculously stupid you just made yourself look..........................................   

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Jun 2024, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 8:33 pm

A "faraway sniper" in full auto mode...hs/she/it said........   
you have no idea how ridiculously stupid you just made yourself look.......................................... 

so you approve of bump stocks because they are useful in mass killings. you are a  murderous criminal.

jerrab » 16 Jun 2024, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 9:28 pm

so you approve of bump stocks because they are useful in mass killings. you are a  murderous criminal.

Below  is my initial reaction on page one of this thread.
With each response you just make yourself look more and more stupid, but please don't let that discourage you from doing what you do best.     

Punch » Today, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 10:39 am
He's pushing a race war. I just know it.

Kyle Rittenhouse slammed after he posts and deletes Tweet encouraging people to buy a bump stock (msn.com)

Ghettoblaster replied....."I got my first look at a bump stock equipped AR15 in action yesterday.
"Stupid Gimmick" sums it up perfectly.
I also saw how quickly Kyle was able to squeeze off a few very well placed shots while on the run and with his life on the line [in single shot mode].
I see no real advantage to having a bump stock.
Especially not in any sort of home defense scenarios."
 
 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Jun 2024, 10:09 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 10:09 pm

Below  is my initial reaction on page one of this thread.
With each response you just make yourself look more and more stupid, but please don't let that discourage you from doing what you do best.     

Ghettoblaster replied....."I got my first look at a bump stock equipped AR15 in action yesterday.
"Stupid Gimmick" sums it up perfectly.
I also saw how quickly Kyle was able to squeeze off a few very well placed shots while on the run and with his life on the line [in single shot mode].
I see no real advantage to having a bump stock.
Especially not in any sort of home defense scenarios."

and then you started your crap that bump stocks would not work in keosha and I never even mentioned  keosha.
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Jun 2024, 10:09 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 10:09 pm

Below  is my initial reaction on page one of this thread.
With each response you just make yourself look more and more stupid, but please don't let that discourage you from doing what you do best.     

Ghettoblaster replied....."I got my first look at a bump stock equipped AR15 in action yesterday.
"Stupid Gimmick" sums it up perfectly.
I also saw how quickly Kyle was able to squeeze off a few very well placed shots while on the run and with his life on the line [in single shot mode].
I see no real advantage to having a bump stock.
Especially not in any sort of home defense scenarios."

GHETTO BLASTER
      

jerrab » Today, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 1:57 pm
bs- just point straight ahead and kill a hundred people in seconds.

Did you see how fast Rittenhouse squeezed off his now famous "triple tap" to snuff out the totally deranged, child molesting  Libtards that ambushed him...?
your
Full auto has a very limited usefulness and that is against armed threats that you need to mow down when split seconds mean the difference between you getting shot and visa versa.
Like when you need to charge that machine gun nest on Hamburger Hill.
In the case of someone wanting to kill 100 defenseless civilians in a crowd, 100 individual taps on the trigger will put more bullets on target [vs "spray and pray" mode] plenty fast enough.---------------------------- your post. I never mentioned keosha.
 

jerrab » 16 Jun 2024, 10:58 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 10:58 pm

GHETTO BLASTER

Did you see how fast Rittenhouse squeezed off his now famous "triple tap" to snuff out the totally deranged, child molesting  Libtards that ambushed him...?
your
Full auto has a very limited usefulness and that is against armed threats that you need to mow down when split seconds mean the difference between you getting shot and visa versa.
Like when you need to charge that machine gun nest on Hamburger Hill.
In the case of someone wanting to kill 100 defenseless civilians in a crowd, 100 individual taps on the trigger will put more bullets on target [vs "spray and pray" mode] plenty fast enough.---------------------------- your post. I never mentioned keosha.

 

jerrab » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 7:28 pm
so you approve of bump stocks because they are useful in mass killings. you are a  murderous criminal.

"Triple Tap" means 3 individual squeezes of the trigger in single shot mode, you dumb ****.........  
Below  is my initial reaction on page one of this thread.
With each response you just make yourself look more and more stupid, but please don't let that discourage you from doing what you do best.      

Punch » Today, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 10:39 am
He's pushing a race war. I just know it.

Kyle Rittenhouse slammed after he posts and deletes Tweet encouraging people to buy a bump stock (msn.com)

Ghettoblaster replied....."I got my first look at a bump stock equipped AR15 in action yesterday.
"Stupid Gimmick" sums it up perfectly.
I also saw how quickly Kyle was able to squeeze off a few very well placed shots while on the run and with his life on the line [in single shot mode].
I see no real advantage to having a bump stock.
Especially not in any sort of home defense scenarios."

jerrab » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
45 minutes ago
you can't refute that a bump stock can be used in a faraway sniper case with no repercussions to the shooter.

A "faraway sniper" in full auto mode...says jerrab........   
you have no idea how ridiculously stupid you just made yourself look..........................................    
 

*rippy38 » 16 Jun 2024, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 1:27 pm

Anyone that's ever handled a select fire rifle will tell you that semi auto is far more effect than full auto will every be at taking out the target.

Full auto wastes ammunition, is inaccurate as hell, and can damage your firearm beyond repair if not managed properly.

If Rittenhouse had been using a bump stock in Kenosha on that faithful night, he would have probably dumped his only mag into the bald headed chomo and ended up braindead from the beating he got because he was out of bullets and wouldn't have been able to fend off the other leftist attackers. 

Bump stocks are a stupid gimmick accessory and the only real reason that are so popular is because the Government tried to tell people they couldn't have them.

Unless you are spraying ammunition into a crowd like that Vegas shooter did. That is what caused Trump to ban them.

Punch » 17 Jun 2024, 1:01 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2024, 1:01 am

Unless you are spraying ammunition into a crowd like that Vegas shooter did. That is what caused Trump to ban them.

The Vegas Shooter would have equipped himself with bump stocks regardless of whether they were banned or not.
The Vegas shooter "sprayed and prayed" over 1000 rounds and only killed 58 people.
There were 1000s of people there too.
Here's a 2018 article by everyone's favorite  firearms expert, Mossad Ayoob and his reaction to Trump's ban.
https://www.backwoodshome.com/blogs/Mas ... stocks/"In the interest of perspective: bump stocks were used in exactly ONE atrocity, the Las Vegas massacre of 2017. 
I do not own one and never saw a need to. 
I see the bump stock as a novelty product in the firearms world, a range toy as it were.
But it’s not about the bump stocks.It’s about the precedent this order sets.The bumpstocks had been approved by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives during the Obama administration. People bought them in good faith because the United States Government said they could. Quite apart from the Second Amendment, I think there should be other succor to be found in the Bill of Rights, because this action is about confiscation without compensation of property legally purchased and responsibly owned. "
 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jun 2024, 1:52 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2024, 1:52 am

The Vegas Shooter would have equipped himself with bump stocks regardless of whether they were banned or not.
The Vegas shooter "sprayed and prayed" over 1000 rounds and only killed 58 people.
There were 1000s of people there too.
Here's a 2018 article by everyone's favorite  firearms expert, Mossad Ayoob and his reaction to Trump's ban.
https://www.backwoodshome.com/blogs/Mas ... stocks/"In the interest of perspective: bump stocks were used in exactly ONE atrocity, the Las Vegas massacre of 2017. 
I do not own one and never saw a need to. 
I see the bump stock as a novelty product in the firearms world, a range toy as it were.
But it’s not about the bump stocks.It’s about the precedent this order sets.The bumpstocks had been approved by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives during the Obama administration. People bought them in good faith because the United States Government said they could. Quite apart from the Second Amendment, I think there should be other succor to be found in the Bill of Rights, because this action is about confiscation without compensation of property legally purchased and responsibly owned. "

killed only 58 people?? col
 

Punch » 17 Jun 2024, 1:01 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2024, 1:01 am

Unless you are spraying ammunition into a crowd like that Vegas shooter did. That is what caused Trump to ban them.

The Vegas shooter would have been far more effective with something like a suppressed semi-auto M-14 (M-21 DMR) with a high quality long range optic on it like this

https://i.postimg.cc/XNZnDLQ6/M14-DMR.jpg

 If your gonna do something, do it right.
 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jun 2024, 1:52 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2024, 1:52 am

The Vegas Shooter would have equipped himself with bump stocks regardless of whether they were banned or not.
The Vegas shooter "sprayed and prayed" over 1000 rounds and only killed 58 people.
There were 1000s of people there too.
Here's a 2018 article by everyone's favorite  firearms expert, Mossad Ayoob and his reaction to Trump's ban.
https://www.backwoodshome.com/blogs/Mas ... stocks/"In the interest of perspective: bump stocks were used in exactly ONE atrocity, the Las Vegas massacre of 2017. 
I do not own one and never saw a need to. 
I see the bump stock as a novelty product in the firearms world, a range toy as it were.
But it’s not about the bump stocks.It’s about the precedent this order sets.The bumpstocks had been approved by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives during the Obama administration. People bought them in good faith because the United States Government said they could. Quite apart from the Second Amendment, I think there should be other succor to be found in the Bill of Rights, because this action is about confiscation without compensation of property legally purchased and responsibly owned. "

I never heard of bump stocks until the vegas shooting.

*Huey » 17 Jun 2024, 4:57 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2024, 4:57 am

I never heard of bump stocks until the vegas shooting.

and not again until now...  

jerrab » 17 Jun 2024, 2:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2024, 2:06 am

killed only 58 people?? col

Out of over 1000 rounds fired there were only 60 kills.
That works out to only 1 in 17 shots being a kill shot....which confirms how ineffective bump stocks are when compared to single shot /acquire a target in your sight mode. 

jerrab » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
45 minutes ago
you can't refute that a bump stock can be used in a faraway sniper case with no repercussions to the shooter.

 Mister "faraway  sniper" weighing in with his expert opinion again...!!

Was :"faraway bump stock  sniper"  your MOS...??      

Don't listen to Mossad Ayoob people, listen to jerrab...!!!



https://www.backwoodshome.com/blogs/Mas ... stocks/"In the interest of perspective: bump stocks were used in exactly ONE atrocity, the Las Vegas massacre of 2017. 
"I do not own one and never saw a need to. 
I see the bump stock as a novelty product in the firearms world, a range toy as it were."
Mossad Ayoob

 
 

*rippy38 » 17 Jun 2024, 4:27 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2024, 4:27 am

The Vegas shooter would have been far more effective with something like a suppressed semi-auto M-14 (M-21 DMR) with a high quality long range optic on it like this

https://i.postimg.cc/XNZnDLQ6/M14-DMR.jpg

 If your gonna do something, do it right.

after 10 people were shot everyone would run away.