in the next few weeks you will hear about it more.
You look so **** stupid already Mister Faraway Bump Stock Sniper ...but keep chiming in with more...!!!
So... why didn't they once Paddock open fire with his bump stock?
hey dumb ****GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jun 2024, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ Out of over 1000 rounds fired there were only 60 kills.
That works out to only 1 in 17 shots being a kill shot....which confirms how ineffective bump stocks are when compared to single shot /acquire a target in your sight mode.
Mister "faraway sniper" weighing in with his expert opinion again...!!
Was :"faraway bump stock sniper" your MOS...??![]()
Don't listen to Mossad Ayoob people, listen to jerrab...!!!
https://www.backwoodshome.com/blogs/Mas ... stocks/"In the interest of perspective: bump stocks were used in exactly ONE atrocity, the Las Vegas massacre of 2017.
"I do not own one and never saw a need to.
I see the bump stock as a novelty product in the firearms world, a range toy as it were."
Mossad Ayoob
---------------------------The Supreme Court said a ban on bump stocks — devices that can be added to semi-automatic firearms to make them fire faster — was unconstitutional, striking down a Trump-era law that was put into place after the deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history.*rippy38 » 17 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ So... why didn't they once Paddock open fire with his bump stock?
Her put fire on the crowd for 10 minutes during the rampage, and the rifle I posted a picture of is capable of firing several hundred rounds a minute, even in semi auto... and is far more accurate than an AR with a bump stock.
The majority of Paddock's bump stock shots hit the ground... but with the semi auto rifle and precision optic example I posted, he could have hit more than he missed.
Point is, the bump stocks in the Vegas shooting had little to do with the end result, and might have actually made the attack less effective at the end of the day.
The Supreme Court ruling has nothing to with the discussion at hand... which is the practical usefulness of a bump stock.jerrab » 17 Jun 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ ---------------------------The Supreme Court said a ban on bump stocks — devices that can be added to semi-automatic firearms to make them fire faster — was unconstitutional, striking down a Trump-era law that was put into place after the deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history.
Or for example a homosexual Day paradeWarcok » 17 Jun 2024, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Bump stocks would be perfect for shooting at large crowds of individuals.. eg.. the DNC convention
the majority hit people ---- 658 // 1057--- do the math*rippy38 » 17 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ So... why didn't they once Paddock open fire with his bump stock?
Her put fire on the crowd for 10 minutes during the rampage, and the rifle I posted a picture of is capable of firing several hundred rounds a minute, even in semi auto... and is far more accurate than an AR with a bump stock.
The majority of Paddock's bump stock shots hit the ground... but with the semi auto rifle and precision optic example I posted, he could have hit more than he missed.
Point is, the bump stocks in the Vegas shooting had little to do with the end result, and might have actually made the attack less effective at the end of the day.
Most of the injuries were from ricochets and people being hurt in the rush to exit the venue.jerrab » 17 Jun 2024, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑ the majority hit people ---- 658 // 1057--- do the math
That was just the first of 1,057 rounds that a mass shooter fired at the crowd in just 11 minutes, killing 58 people and injuring 500 more. It was the deadliest mass shooting in US history.
Hey Mister "Far Away Sniper" .....the Vegas Shooter could have killed more people in less time by firing single shot mode.jerrab » 17 Jun 2024, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑ hey dumb ****
---------------------------------When a deafening noise erupted at the Route 91 Harvest music festival in Las Vegas on October 1, 2017, bartender Heather Gooze thought she was hearing audio feedback from the speakers.The source of the sound, Gooze soon learned, was gunfire.That was just the first of 1,057 rounds that a mass shooter fired at the crowd in just 11 minutes, killing 58 people and injuring 500 more. It was the deadliest mass shooting in US history.
yet no proof of anything you said.*rippy38 » 17 Jun 2024, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Most of the injuries were from ricochets and people being hurt in the rush to exit the venue.
The same amount of lead or more could have been put on the crowd, and in a more effective manner, with a semi auto equipped with a precision optic.
Not to mention that the M14 fires a much larger and harder hitting round that your run of the mill AR.
The next year, the ATF issued the rule that concluded bump stocks are illegal machine guns. Anyone who owned or possessed a bump stock was required to either destroy the material or turn it in to the agency to avoid criminal penalties.GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey Mister "Far Away Sniper" .....the Vegas Shooter could have killed more people in less time by firing single shot mode.
No marksman or wild game hunter would say that only 60 kill shots after 1000 shots is what they would expect to get firing in semi auto mode.
A hunter would starve to death at that rate.
Anyone who wants to, can match the rate of fire that a bump stock rifle has with just their finger and be just as far off target too.
Let that soak in.
Hey Mister "Far Away Sniper" .....the Vegas Shooter could have killed more people in less time by firing single shot mode.jerrab » 17 Jun 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ The next year, the ATF issued the rule that concluded bump stocks are illegal machine guns. Anyone who owned or possessed a bump stock was required to either destroy the material or turn it in to the agency to avoid criminal penalties.
GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jun 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey Mister "Far Away Sniper" .....the Vegas Shooter could have killed more people in less time by firing single shot mode.
No marksman or wild game hunter would say that only 60 kill shots after 1000 shots is what they would expect to get firing in semi auto mode.
A hunter would starve to death at that rate.
Anyone who wants to, can match the rate of fire that a bump stock rifle has with just their finger and be just as far off target too.
Let that soak in.
SEMI AUTO SINGLE SHOT RAPID FIRE MODE
https://youtu.be/ktApu85yLP8?si=xTX5502vG8LwGO1H
ANY QUESTIONS DUMB ****...?
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/what- ... ire-stock/jerrab » 17 Jun 2024, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ you make things up, dick head.------------------------------How it works: The device replaces a semiautomatic firearm's standard stock and harnesses the recoil energy of the gun, allowing the weapon to slide and "bump" between the shooter's shoulder and trigger finger.
- It can produce a rate of fire far higher than what could be achieved by an untrained or average shooter using a weapon with a traditional stock.
GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jun 2024, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/what- ... ire-stock/
"The typical bump fire stock will yield a cyclic rate of less than 300 rounds per minute, [less than 5 shots per second] though it does so with a standard semi-automatic firearm."
"Also, accuracy is severely impeded because you aren’t holding the rifle as you normally would to enable accurate fire. Bump fire stocks wouldn’t be viable in a military setting or law enforcement setting" [because they are simply not as effective as semi auto mode]
Here is 8 rounds per second with 8 trigger pulls .....so eat **** Libtard...!!!![]()
https://youtu.be/WzHG-ibZaKM?si=1jP_XYPZKiAhcL8O
Well for starters that you are a mother **** liar who made this wild claim that have never happened
I produced a pratical firearms expert [a guy who investigated police shootings and has made a living as a firearms trainer and author] who told you that the bump stock mod reduces accuracy greatlyjerrab
bs- just point straight ahead and kill a hundred people in seconds.
GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jun 2024, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Well for starters that you are a mother **** liar who made this wild claim that have never happened
so you claim bump stocks are not necessary so there forth they are useless, but you cry if they are banned.GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jun 2024, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/what- ... ire-stock/
"The typical bump fire stock will yield a cyclic rate of less than 300 rounds per minute, [less than 5 shots per second] though it does so with a standard semi-automatic firearm."
"Also, accuracy is severely impeded because you aren’t holding the rifle as you normally would to enable accurate fire. Bump fire stocks wouldn’t be viable in a military setting or law enforcement setting" [because they are simply not as effective as semi auto mode]
Here is 8 rounds per second with 8 trigger pulls .....so eat **** Libtard...!!!![]()
https://youtu.be/WzHG-ibZaKM?si=1jP_XYPZKiAhcL8O