Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
I'm Very Much Liking The Sound Of This..
I'm Very Much Liking The Sound Of This..
By Blackvegetable
18 Jun 2024 6:21 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
18 Jun 2024 7:12 am
I guess when catching spelling and grammar mistakes is all ya got, then you gotta play to your strengths.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
18 Jun 2024 7:15 am
Trippie,*rippy38 » 18 Jun 2024, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑ I guess when catching spelling and grammar mistakes is all ya got, then you gotta play to your strengths.
What have you ever "got"?
Fee-fees, and shame.
18 Jun 2024 7:19 am
You sound upset.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2024, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ Trippie,
What have you ever "got"?
Fee-fees, and shame.
Don't cry bubby... it will be okay.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
18 Jun 2024 7:26 am
What did I miss?
18 Jun 2024 7:29 am
I'm disappointed on the subject matter, after reading the thread title, I was sure you were talking about a Biden fart.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2024, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ But Bannon isn’t eligible for the lowest-level prison setup because he still has a pending criminal case against him in New York, where he is fighting the charges and set to go to trial in September. That case accuses him of defrauding donors in a fundraising effort branded the “We Build the Wall” campaign for a border wall between the US and Mexico.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/17/politics ... index.html
I'm thinking this could be Bad News for Grifty...
18 Jun 2024 7:29 am
A bunch.
You always do.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
18 Jun 2024 10:23 am
How many plaintiff / donors did it take to build this case against Bannon...?Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2024, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ But Bannon isn’t eligible for the lowest-level prison setup because he still has a pending criminal case against him in New York, where he is fighting the charges and set to go to trial in September. That case accuses him of defrauding donors in a fundraising effort branded the “We Build the Wall” campaign for a border wall between the US and Mexico.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/17/politics ... index.html
I'm thinking this could be Bad News for Grifty...
Did the plaintiffs press charges on their own or was this case manufactured by the [[[JWO]]]...?
Did Bannon exceed the limits of "Grift Immunity" that had already been established by [[[JWO]]] sponsored puppets Bill and Hillary Clinton...?
18 Jun 2024 10:33 am
If it's criminal, the "plaintiff" is the State. The swindled are "victims" and may be "witnesses".GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Jun 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ How many plaintiff / donors did it take to build this case against Bannon...?
Did the plaintiffs press charges on their own or was this case manufactured by the [[[JWO]]]...?
Did Bannon exceed the limits of "Grift Immunity" that had already been established by [[[JWO]]] sponsored puppets Bill and Hillary Clinton...?
It all begins with a referral.
Nod.
18 Jun 2024 10:38 am
Answer the question instead of looking for more ways to dodge it on "technicalities"Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2024, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ If it's criminal, the "plaintiff" is the State. The swindled are "victims" and may be "witnesses".
It all begins with a referral.
Nod.
You fool nobody but yourself when you resort to that.
Looks like the plain and simple truth here is.... NO DONORS FILED ANY COMPLAINTS OR CHARGES AGAINST BANNON.
THIS CASE WAS MANUFACTURED BY THE NEVER TRUMPER [[[JWO]]]
NEXT..
18 Jun 2024 10:42 am
Bring me evidence supporting your delusions and we can debate it.GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Jun 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ Answer the question instead of looking for more ways to dodge it on "technicalities"
You fool nobody but yourself when you resort to that.
Looks like the plain and simple truth here is.... NO DONORS FILED ANY COMPLAINTS OR CHARGES AGAINST BANNON.
THIS CASE WAS MANUFACTURED BY THE NEVER TRUMPER [[[JWO]]]
NEXT..
18 Jun 2024 10:45 am
ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS YOU COWARDLY POS....Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ Bring me evidence supporting your delusions and we can debate it.
How many plaintiff / donors did it take to build this case against Bannon...?
Did the plaintiffs press charges on their own or was this case manufactured by the [[[JWO]]]...?
Did Bannon exceed the limits of "Grift Immunity" that had already been established by [[[JWO]]] sponsored puppets Bill and Hillary Clinton...?
18 Jun 2024 10:49 am
What have you got to offer?GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Jun 2024, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS YOU COWARDLY POS....
How many plaintiff / donors did it take to build this case against Bannon...?
Did the plaintiffs press charges on their own or was this case manufactured by the [[[JWO]]]...?
Did Bannon exceed the limits of "Grift Immunity" that had already been established by [[[JWO]]] sponsored puppets Bill and Hillary Clinton...?
18 Jun 2024 11:06 am
ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS YOU COWARDLY POS....
How many plaintiff / donors did it take to build this case against Bannon...?
Did the plaintiffs press charges on their own or was this case manufactured by the [[[JWO]]]...?
Did Bannon exceed the limits of "Grift Immunity" that had already been established by [[[JWO]]] sponsored puppets Bill and Hillary Clinton...?
18 Jun 2024 11:10 am
Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2024, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ But Bannon isn’t eligible for the lowest-level prison setup because he still has a pending criminal case against him in New York, where he is fighting the charges and set to go to trial in September. That case accuses him of defrauding donors in a fundraising effort branded the “We Build the Wall” campaign for a border wall between the US and Mexico.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/17/politics ... index.html
I'm thinking this could be Bad News for Grifty...
No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.
TDS
CNN:
My media comment justified again.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
18 Jun 2024 12:37 pm
What does it mean for Grifty?Vegas » 18 Jun 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.
TDS
CNN:
My media comment justified again.
Media comment long since debunked.
18 Jun 2024 1:50 pm
Rule, idiot. **** your questions or 3k greenies.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ What does it mean for Grifty?
Media comment long since debunked.
Not even close.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Who is online
In total there are 3051 users online :: 9 registered, 14 bots, and 3028 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, jerra b, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: LCC, TTD-Content, DuckDuckBot, proximic, ADmantX, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Bolt, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, Applebot, Googlebot, bingbot