Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/unit ... ion-status
good reason you turned to the Trades...
Graphs might as well be Sumerian to you, right?DeezerShoove » 19 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Pathetic. What the **** are you posting? Are you capable of independent thought?
I know you're a total clown clamoring for attention. An irrelevancy.
Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/unit ... ion-status
good reason you turned to the Trades...
OH, and @Blackvegetable , as a I TOLD YOU HOW **** STUPID YOU ARE....Beekeeper » 19 Jun 2024, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So you got 33.64 Deaths per 100k in a one-month period in 2022. THEN it declined to nearly IDENTICAL rates for both groups.
So, in a nation with nearly 1,000 deaths per 100,000 annually, how does that compare?? That's works out to 82 DEATHS PER 100,000 PER MONTH anyway, *******!! Covid only accounted for 5% of ALL DEATHS in 2022 in the final tally. PERIOD!!
YOU want to make it sound like it was 95% or more of all deaths. It never was. In the SCHEME OF THINGS, it added very little to the overall statistics of deaths.95% were caused by something TOTALLY DIFFERENT!!
FastStats - Deaths and Mortality (cdc.gov)
Data are for the U.S.Don't you just HATE IT when you get your *** KICKED UP AROUND YOUR CHIN SO YOU CAN SMELL THAT **** OF YOURS ALL DAY LONG???
- Number of deaths: 3,279,857
- Death rate: 984.1 deaths per 100,000 population
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Beekeeper » 19 Jun 2024, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So you got 33.64 Deaths per 100k in a one-month period in 2022. THEN it declined to nearly IDENTICAL rates for both groups.
So, in a nation with nearly 1,000 deaths per 100,000 annually, how does that compare?? That's works out to 82 DEATHS PER 100,000 PER MONTH anyway, *******!! Covid only accounted for 5% of ALL DEATHS in 2022 in the final tally. PERIOD!!
YOU want to make it sound like it was 95% or more of all deaths. It never was. In the SCHEME OF THINGS, it added very little to the overall statistics of deaths.95% were caused by something TOTALLY DIFFERENT!!
FastStats - Deaths and Mortality (cdc.gov)
Data are for the U.S.Don't you just HATE IT when you get your *** KICKED UP AROUND YOUR CHIN SO YOU CAN SMELL THAT **** OF YOURS ALL DAY LONG???
- Number of deaths: 3,279,857
- Death rate: 984.1 deaths per 100,000 population
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/ ... usly-known
- The COVID-19 pandemic killed nearly 16 million people worldwide in 2020 and 2021 and caused global life expectancy to decline by 1.6 years between 2019 and 2020
The Old&Stupid and the Stupid.Beekeeper » 19 Jun 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ OH, and @Blackvegetable , as a I TOLD YOU HOW **** STUPID YOU ARE....
The OVERWHELMING majority of those deaths were folks OVER age 80+
YOUR DATA FROM YOUR TABLE....
Unvaccinated Vaccinated with bivalent booster Vaccinated without bivalent booster
deaths per 100,000 people deaths per 100,000 people deaths per 100,000 people
Age group 80+ 66.54 6.24 -60.30
Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ The Old&Stupid and the Stupid.
The FOX demographic.
The Old&Stupid, and the plain stupid.Beekeeper » 19 Jun 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ NO, ****, that came FROM YOUR LINK!!
United States: COVID-19 weekly death rate by vaccination status (ourworldindata.org)
Sucks you didn't see the TABLE tab at the TOP OF THE GRAPH!!
But no one expects a **** MORON like you to actually UNDERSTAND how that works and what the DATA MEANS!!
COVID is no match against natural immunity and a strong physical constitution.Blackvegetable » 19 Jun 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ Twice?
@Cannonpointer is here to tell you about natural immunity.
I never got it, to my knowledge....jabbed 4x.
And?
Sometimes it isn't all about Li'l Trippie.
I don't see any citations.*rippy38 » 19 Jun 2024, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑ COVID is no match against natural immunity and a strong physical constitution.
You always brag about your peak physical condition and your stamina on the ski slopes so, you obviously bought the propaganda if you were jabbed 4 times. If you really are as fit as you claim, the jabs were completely unnecessary. At most they kept you from experiencing symptoms when you most likely did indeed contract the virus.
The vax was therapeutic more than a vaccine, and if anything if facilitated the spread by masking symptoms in infected people that continued their daily routines and continuing the spread. The vax didn't prevent the spread, it kept the symptoms from getting so bad that hospitalization was necessary.
The vast majority of the people that died with COVID had at least one other comorbidity, or even multiple, present at the time as well. The risk vs. benefit equation for those people would have definitely leaned towards getting the jab versus not, but for healthy fit people, it definitely wasn't worth the risk... since COVID wasn't gonna kill them anyway.
There were also quite a few deaths at the beginning that were counted as COVID deaths that simply died with COVID present, and not necessarily from it.
https://www.aamc.org/news/how-are-covid ... omplicated
If you've only had four the you're behind schedule too. I'm pretty sure their on or around version 8 now.
I don't see a rebuttal...
Beyond worthless.
How does one rebut fee-fees?*rippy38 » 19 Jun 2024, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't see a rebuttal...
Oh wait, there's none.
Nevermind
Won't be a mystery after you post that elusive rule on questions.DeezerShoove » 19 Jun 2024, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Statements without question marks are impossible for you.
You must be quite stupid that you have to ask everything.
Maybe you could post an op-ed?
It would surely be better informed.
Better informed feefees?