Liberal Forum

FOS » 20 Jun 2024, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 12:56 pm

One that makes me laugh is 'everyone is the same but diversity is important'

Absolutely one of the best.
The pretzel logic these **** have to use to make that "work" is very amusing.
...and abusing.
It's cracking our society but it's one of our strengths.  

DeezerShoove » 20 Jun 2024, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 2:40 pm

Absolutely one of the best.
The pretzel logic these **** have to use to make that "work" is very amusing.
...and abusing.
It's cracking our society but it's one of our strengths.

Black lives matter except in blue cities.
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2024, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 2:34 pm

Woah, woah, woah - let's slow our roll for a minute, there, my neocon friend (please notice, I am using "friend" in the professional wrestling context).

You are telling this board that you favor cutting all US aid to israel. Be clear - no mud in the road. Say the lie out loud.

No dickhead, I never said that.
I said if ONLY given the option of supporting the cutting of federal funding to BOTH California and Israel or supporting the cutting neither of Israel or California, I'd support cutting BOTH.

But if forced to cut ONLY one or the other, I'd have to insist that ALL federal funding to every other country (including Ukraine) is cut first before cutting funding to Israel.

Got it through your thick head now? 
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2024, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 2:46 pm

Black lives matter except in blue cities.

Black and blue go together.
Africans and libs?
****** and police?
Lights are off in the swimming pool?

Confusing...

Sumela » 20 Jun 2024, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 1:33 pm

Pretty sure we are saying about the same thing.

Not sure

but pretty sure

That this is the one on the other board that I thought t was you
 
 

Mrkelly » 20 Jun 2024, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 3:05 pm

Not sure

but pretty sure

That this is the one on the other board that I thought t was you

FOS or Low IQ Trash?
 
 

Zeets2 » 20 Jun 2024, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 2:49 pm

No dickhead, I never said that.
I said if ONLY given the option of supporting the cutting of federal funding to BOTH California and Israel or supporting the cutting neither of Israel or California, I'd support cutting BOTH.

That's what I thought.

I had you clarify because you misread the question.

I never presented them as a package. I presented them as two separate packages, and CORRECTLY predicted your bias.

Zeets2 » 20 Jun 2024, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 2:49 pm

But if forced to cut ONLY one or the other, I'd have to insist that ALL federal funding to every other country (including Ukraine) is cut first before cutting funding to Israel.

Exactly - you're an israel firster, just like I said. Or in the case of cutting funding, an israel laster.

Got it through your thick head now?

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2024, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 3:13 pm

That's what I thought.

I had you clarify because you misread the question.

I never presented them as a package. I presented them as two separate packages, and CORRECTLY predicted your bias.

Exactly - you're an israel firster, just like I said. Or in the case of cutting funding, an israel laster.

Got it through your thick head now?

  He is a PIFA...Put Israel First Always
 

Sumela » 20 Jun 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 3:18 pm

  He is a PIFA...Put Israel First Always

Which is effeminate enough all by itself - but the squeals, the squeals...

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2024, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 3:20 pm

Which is effeminate enough all by itself - but the squeals, the squeals...

Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2024, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 3:13 pm

That's what I thought.

I had you clarify because you misread the question.

I never presented them as a package. I presented them as two separate packages, and CORRECTLY predicted your bias.

Exactly - you're an israel firster, just like I said. Or in the case of cutting funding, an israel laster.

Got it through your thick head now?

It was YOUR hypothetical question dickhead, not mine!
And yes, I would rather see Israel supported with weaponry alone as they continue to be the only Middle Eastern country actively fighting against terrorist countries like Iran and those they support like Hamas and Hezbollah before we waste another dime supporting the funding of illegals to get free healthcare, free smartphones, free travel, free education, free hotels and free debit cards as bribes for them to vote for criminal liberals to retain the kind of power that has ruined California and other liberal states.  But I certainly do not support sending them money to pay for their free higher education or any other socialist policies.

It's too bad that you let your blatant antisemitism get in the way of standing against the complete socialist takeover of California which you obviously don't consider to be a major US problem.

So here's a far more realistic hypothetical for you, since that's the game you seem so eager to play.
Would you support the Trump policies he's indicated he'll put through to cut funding to any state that has declared themselves a sanctuary city and support his round up and expulsion of the millions of illegals that Biden has let in?
 

Zeets2 » 20 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm

It was YOUR hypothetical question dickhead, not mine!

TWO questions, dickhead - until you gay-married them.

I never gay-married them. That was all you.

Zeets2 » 20 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm

And yes, I would rather see Israel supported with weaponry alone as they continue to be the only Middle Eastern country actively fighting against terrorist countries like Iran and those they support like Hamas and Hezbollah before we waste another dime supporting the funding of illegals to get free healthcare, free smartphones, free travel, free education, free hotels and free debit cards as bribes for them to vote for criminal liberals to retain the kind of power that has ruined California and other liberal states.  But I certainly do not support sending them money to pay for their free higher education or any other socialist policies.

And here we have your tacit admission that you are a typical frank burns liver lips conjob.

DEPENDING ON THE CONVERSATION, you are perfectly capable of grasping the fungibility of money. But to hide your pro-socialist ****, you pretend that we can support a socialist country without supporting socialism.

Zeets2 » 20 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm

It's too bad that you let your blatant antisemitism get in the way of standing against the complete socialist takeover of California which you obviously don't consider to be a major US problem.

Here you go again, assuming facts not in evidence. I would vote for BOTH of the things I trotted out to you. *******.

Zeets2 » 20 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm

So here's a far more realistic hypothetical for you, since that's the game you seem so eager to play.
Would you support the Trump policies he's indicated he'll put through to cut funding to any state that has declared themselves a sanctuary city and support his round up and expulsion of the millions of illegals that Biden has let in?

What the **** do YOU think? Of course I support those policies.

But I am for ending ALL federal aid to ALL states and ALL cities unless the aid is legislated in a stand alone bill passed by congress with a sole purpose in response to disaster. Unlike you nanny state boys, I am for keeping taxes AT HOME. Money is power, and power to the people is right on. No more income tax, no more borrowing. A federal government with a balanced budget about the size of the combined budgets of the five largest states would serve all Constitutional functions, and prevent the feds from enforcing a foreign jurisdiction on the States and people.

LowIQTrash » 19 Jun 2024, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jun 2024, 8:55 pm

Remember: it was ST Raygun AND the ACLU who did away with mental institutions! 
 

I'm sure he would've changed course if he knew all the inmates were going to run for office as dimocrats and cost the country trillions in 40 years of bad policy
 

It's not how much money is spent. Democrat policies create **** full of homeless drug adicts and criminals...at any price.

If you want to do something different with Ukraine money consider giving it back to those who earn it...the tax payor.

The issue isn't how the government spends it so much as it is that they get too much of it to spend.
 

DeezerShoove » 20 Jun 2024, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 12:04 pm

There are many contradictions in our society that somewhat confuse me.
Yours is a good one.

Another is the drug problem. (Even total acceptance of being **** up on whatever...)
"Let people choose for themselves what they put in their body."
Then moan about **** cities, lower standards needed to pump morons through school, random violence, etc.

Turning "Black Lives Matter" into a battle cry and start the destruction.

Marketing: all lives are unique, precious, school choice, feed starving America, violence is bad, etc.
Marketing: Re-label abortion to choice so killing your **** prize is easier: It ain't a human child. It's a snot rag.
Mind you I don't care one way or the other. It's marketing that agenda and/or dumb people falling for it bugs me.

There are "couple more" but you get the idea.
You seem a tad more alert than BlaVe.

BlaVe says he went to Brown and was descended from Scandinavian nobility. We should all bow in his presence.

Warcok » 20 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm

I'm sure he would've changed course if he knew all the inmates were going to run for office as dimocrats and cost the country trillions in 40 years of bad policy

Yeah, well I’m sure he wouldn’t have supported amnesty if he knew that was a never ending grift. But alas…

LowIQTrash » 20 Jun 2024, 10:40 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 10:40 pm

BlaVe says he went to Brown and was descended from Scandinavian nobility. We should all bow in his presence.

And I thought he is a brown, descended sandy testicle. We should elbow his pubence. 
 

DeezerShoove » 20 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm

And I thought he is a brown, descended sandy testicle. We should elbow his pubence.

I learned today that, due to the 1M+ newly minted millionaires in China over the past 40 years, they always have some sort of “ritual” to show off their wealth when the subject is brought up.

For example, if you went to a restaurant outing with 20 people, the richest guy buys the most expensive wine on the list and nobody is to touch the wine. It’s just there for show.

Apparently, enjoying a nice dinner together WITHOUT talking about MONEY is something the mongoloids can’t fathom. Mongoloids ALWAYS talk about money in their get togethers - a little fact unknown (and unthinkable) to the majority of whites. Whites love talking about hobbies, pastimes, and characteristics that make them unique / a person of interest.

(“Crazy rich Asians” sums it up nicely. I think it’s like every one of them has a chip on their shoulder and unless they make a gazillion $$$ they can’t be happy or something.)

Chinks: giving these ****** a run for their money on scumbaggery! Oh well, at least they aren’t in control of the money supply and doling out new FRNs to their Tribe members.

@Cannonpointer  
 

LowIQTrash » 20 Jun 2024, 11:02 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 11:02 pm

I learned today that, due to the 1M+ newly minted millionaires in China over the past 40 years, they always have some sort of “ritual” to show off their wealth when the subject is brought up.

For example, if you went to a restaurant outing with 20 people, the richest guy buys the most expensive wine on the list and nobody is to touch the wine. It’s just there for show.

Apparently, enjoying a nice dinner together WITHOUT talking about MONEY is something the mongoloids can’t fathom. Mongoloids ALWAYS talk about money in their get togethers - a little fact unknown (and unthinkable) to the majority of whites. Whites love talking about hobbies, pastimes, and characteristics that make them unique / a person of interest.

(“Crazy rich Asians” sums it up nicely. I think it’s like every one of them has a chip on their shoulder and unless they make a gazillion $$$ they can’t be happy or something.)

Chinks: giving these ****** a run for their money on scumbaggery! Oh well, at least they aren’t in control of the money supply and doling out new FRNs to their Tribe members.

@Cannonpointer

One of my best friends, a golf buddy, was rich as ****. The bastid died on me a couple years ago.
We spent long hours together for years sitting next to each other in a cart and never seemed to get around to talking about money. At least not in the sense of how much either of us have (or didn't have). He was a humble man.

Having been in the Detroit environs for so many years, we did cross paths with the term "*** rich" a few times.
And not always from white people, mind you.

That would manifest itself in odd little ways:
At one of the Detroit casinos, when looking for a roulette table to piss away a little money try to avoid the African that just bought $500 in color and immediately puts a stack of 10 one dollar chips on 25 numbers. He'll do it again and again.
It may take him a half an hour to lose his roll and the dealer spends most of the time counting and stacking for the Big Shot trading the same chips. They like that attention.
Then he'll drive his Cadillac back into his **** 'hood.

Splashing money is a thing for some.
Is Crazy Rich Asians a nice way to say "*** rich"? Maybe in a way.
 

Sumela » 20 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm

FOS or Low IQ Trash?

FOS