QED.Beekeeper » 26 Jun 2024, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑ SO??
Better than NOT HAVING ANY CITIATIONS TO LINK TO which is in YOUR CASE, all you have.
This is how **** stupid you people are...*rippy38 » 26 Jun 2024, 6:20 am » wrote: ↑ Not whining... just pointing out the your "Child Groomer, Sexual Predator" title fits... perfectly.
I mean, it's a caption on the internet... so it must be true.
Right?
So that's a "yes" as well...
No...it's clearly
But... but... muh caption!Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2024, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑ No...it's clearly
This is how **** stupid you people are...
You've made your point.
No, that's YOUR "rule".Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2024, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑ You've made your point.
To you they're all the same.
He knows there isn't a single other source on the entirety of the internet claiming that the Vanity Fair Society page picture he keeps posting is of Trump and Cohn.Beekeeper » 26 Jun 2024, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ So where is your LINK to your CITIATIONS that collaborate your CLAIM that Cohn and Trump are in that Vanity Fair PHOTO!!
Seeing how EVERY PIECE OF EVIDENCE used in court is COLLABORATED or its considered ****!!
Sucks for you, huh? Seeing how that "BEYOND a reasonable doubt' is a SOLID STANDARD if you want to prove something!!
**** idiot.Beekeeper » 26 Jun 2024, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ So where is your LINK to your CITIATIONS that collaborate your CLAIM that Cohn and Trump are in that Vanity Fair PHOTO!!
Seeing how EVERY PIECE OF EVIDENCE used in court is COLLABORATED or its considered ****!!
Sucks for you, huh? Seeing how that "BEYOND a reasonable doubt' is a SOLID STANDARD if you want to prove something!!
*rippy38 » 26 Jun 2024, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑ He knows there isn't a single other source on the entirety of the internet claiming that the Vanity Fair Society page picture he keeps posting is of Trump and Cohn.
Not a single one.
Yet he stands steadfastly by "the caption" because narcissists can NEVER admit they are wrong... even when it means looking like complete fools for hanging on to their ****.
I've seen it first hand.
How do you know what I know about what's on the internet?He knows there isn't a single other source on the entirety of the internet
What EVIDENCE do you have that it is false?Yet he stands steadfastly by "the caption" because narcissists can NEVER admit they are wrong...
What are you "hanging on to"?even when it means looking like complete fools for hanging on to their ****.
TESTIFY!I've seen it first hand.
I have presented my evidence numerous times and your rebuttal is to stick your fingers in your ears and go "lalalalalalala" and start ranting about the Vanity Fair Society page caption.Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2024, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ How do you know what I know about what's on the internet?
**** idiot.
What EVIDENCE do you have that it is false?
EVIDENCE.
What are you "hanging on to"?
TESTIFY!
Then be sure to pass the snake.
1 concise bullet point will suffice.*rippy38 » 26 Jun 2024, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ I have presented my evidence numerous times and your rebuttal is to stick your fingers in your ears and go "lalalalalalala" and start ranting about the Vanity Fair Society page caption.
These are the facts...
1) It's looks nothing like Donald Trump.
2) It's too short to be Donald Trump.
3) Not a single other source on the entirety of the internet backs up the claim that it's Trump.
You have a caption on the Vanity Fair Society page.
Case closed... you're an idiot.
nod
🤣
I accept your first concession of the day.
Provide a source showing that this is not true...
Try again.*rippy38 » 26 Jun 2024, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ Provide a source showing that this is not true...
https://i.postimg.cc/zfsfdjWn/Screensho ... 26-465.png
Go.
This is the rule*rippy38 » 26 Jun 2024, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ I accept your first concession of the day.
I have a feeling that it will be one of many.
🤣
I accept your second concession of the morning.
You're running....hysterically.....again.*rippy38 » 26 Jun 2024, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ I accept your second concession of the morning.
You're flailing early today.