Yeah, but he's smarter than everyone else so... there is that.Cannonpointer » 24 Jun 2024, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ And no one is using it against trump except ONE child groomer on a remote corner of the poopisphere...
Address the OP instead of running like a little bitch for once, would ya?
True.nefarious101 » 24 Jun 2024, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ this is a good argument for Re-education Camps and deprogramming...otherwise they just become worthless human beings and wards or the state
Hate to teell you **** Dr. DICK SUCKER, but you have NO CLUE and why there is DEFINITELY CIVIL LAWS that PROTECT THE PERSON IN THE IMAGE FROM USING IT WITHOUT PERMISSION!!!Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ Image doesn't belong to him.
No release required..
Post the name of the photographer.
publicity | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)
The right to publicity is guaranteed in the United States to protect an individual’s identity. Specifically, the right to publicity concerns the exclusive right to license one’s own identity for commercial purposes, preventing other individuals unauthorized commercial use of their identity. The right to publicity protects the aspects of personal identity, including one’s persona, name, nickname, or any other distinguishing aspect of an individual, for commercial benefit without the individual’s consent. The state common and statutory law generally protects the right to publicity in the United States.
It's sitting there, waiting for you..Beekeeper » 24 Jun 2024, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ Hate to teell you **** Dr. DICK SUCKER, but you have NO CLUE and why there is DEFINITELY CIVIL LAWS that PROTECT THE PERSON IN THE IMAGE FROM USING IT WITHOUT PERMISSION!!!
Oops!!! Since this IS BEING USED TO PROMOTE A FILM FOR FINANCIAL GAIN, YOU LOSE, ASSHOLE!!
Damn, that is going to leave a MASSIVE MARK!!!
Four pages on this thread and you have YET to address the OP...Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑ It's sitting there, waiting for you..
It's taunting you...
Go gettem!
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/ori ... 04/820.jpgBlackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑ It's sitting there, waiting for you..
It's taunting you...
Go gettem!
Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑ You're one dumb motherfucler.
https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/20 ... t-evil-men
If you want an idiot to do some work...EDC4ALL! » 24 Jun 2024, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Odd, I can find nothing in her bio about taking Trumps picture with Roy Cohn. I find no pictures in her collection of Trump or Cohn. I find NO references ANY **** WHERE on the internet of the picture you posted. Your proof is a line at the bottom of the pic. Hmmm. Odd how that is the only evidence you have to support your nonsense. She was a goofy photographer that had a thing for taking pictures of queer people. was probably queer herself. Just a rich bitch with connections.
Talk about falling for Deep Fake news. You gobble worse than a $5 Bangkok hooker!
What reason would she have to lie, 45 years ago?Just a rich bitch with connections.
Roy was Sweet Donnie's groomer.She was a goofy photographer that had a thing for taking pictures of queer people. was probably queer herself.
if that is truly Trump then post some other proof. It should be **** EASY Einstein. Why are there NO stories ANYWHERE that back up your claim????Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ If you want an idiot to do some work...
Do you have any idea what the Getty Archive is?
What reason would she have to lie, 45 years ago?
Roy was Sweet Donnie's groomer.
Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ If you want an idiot to do some work...
Do you have any idea what the Getty Archive is?
What reason would she have to lie, 45 years ago?
Roy was Sweet Donnie's groomer.
Do you know that Grifty was groomed by Roy?EDC4ALL! » 24 Jun 2024, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ if that is truly Trump then post some other proof. It should be **** EASY Einstein. Why are there NO stories ANYWHERE that back up your claim????
Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ If you want an idiot to do some work...
Do you have any idea what the Getty Archive is?
What reason would she have to lie, 45 years ago?
Roy was Sweet Donnie's groomer.
It's Cohn.Beekeeper » 24 Jun 2024, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ You must be a sadomasochist since you have been BITCH SLAPPED AROUND this thread MASSIVELY and you keep coming back for MORE!!
There is ZERO evidence that this photo is OF TRUMP AND COHEN!! NONE!!
How fast do you think a COURT OF LAW would laugh you out into the sewer with your claim?? I give them 11 seconds and you would be TOSSED ASAP!!
Are these your words?Beekeeper » 24 Jun 2024, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ No one said it wasn't ****!!
But the one on the right is in question and there is ZERO EVIDENCE IT IS Trump!!
NO ONE else is claiming it, and no one else has PROVEN IT, DUMB **** PIECE OF MORON ****!!
There is ZERO evidence that this photo is OF TRUMP AND COHEN!!
Answer the questions.EDC4ALL! » 24 Jun 2024, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑ please show us all where the photographer says that it's a picture of Trump?
So?? It's a typo, Dr. DICK SUCKER!!
So you're Einstein now?Beekeeper » 24 Jun 2024, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑ So?? It's a typo, Dr. DICK SUCKER!!
I guess you've never made one in your entire miserable, perfect PIECE OF **** LIFE, huh??
As a FYI, Einstein was one of the WORST spellers and grammatically poor writers EVER!! He credits his first wife with making sense out of his research into his theories.
Sucks for you, huh, that GENIUS doesn't depend on perfect spelling.