Liberal Forum

Beakman » 23 Jun 2024, 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2024, 5:19 pm

THis is gonna HURT!      
https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/02/polit...ans/index.html

Oh noooooooooooooo

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 7:58 am

All you FOX rubes are too embarrassed to answer..

Not that I blame you idiots.

You consider me a FOX rube and yet like others, I have answered you multiple times.  It does no good to answer you.  You either lie about it or forget it.  I say, stick to the facts because no one seems to want to play your idiotic games. 

*Huey » 24 Jun 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 11:24 am

You consider me a FOX rube and yet like others, I have answered you multiple times.  It does no good to answer you.  You either lie about it or forget it.  I say, stick to the facts because no one seems to want to play your idiotic games.

:rofl:  

 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 8:21 am

I repeat..

If it doesn't answer a question, or include a credible citation, it's never worth reading.

Oh look. Veghead, as always, hiding behind a question. I bet you haven't answered one yet...the first time around. 

Alaways asking, never answering. Then the narcissists genuinely believes that he is owed an answer to his questions. 

**** moron. 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 12:06 pm

 

 

 

It is funny that you don't recall how many times you asked me and how many times I answered.  Even did the math for you.  I guess you are in the early stages of dementia.  
 

Vegas » 24 Jun 2024, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 12:14 pm

Oh look. Veghead, as always, hiding behind a question. I bet you haven't answered one yet...the first time around. 

Alaways asking, never answering. Then the narcissists genuinely believes that he is owed an answer to his questions. 

**** moron.

What are you putting up?

Vegas » 24 Jun 2024, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 12:14 pm

Oh look. Veghead, as always, hiding behind a question. I bet you haven't answered one yet...the first time around. 

Alaways asking, never answering. Then the narcissists genuinely believes that he is owed an answer to his questions. 

**** moron.

Narcissists love to impose rules that they either refuse or have no intention of ever living by themselves.

You are required to cater to their wishes, and if you don't, then you've capitulated and become irrelevant.

It's just the skewed way they look at the world.


 

*Huey » 24 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm

It is funny that you don't recall how many times you asked me and how many times I answered.  Even did the math for you.  I guess you are in the early stages of dementia.

I certainly remember the more numerous time it caused you to melt down, Keystrokes Too Far.

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 12:21 pm

I certainly remember the more numerous time it caused you to melt down, Keystrokes Too Far.

 

You got me confused with somebody else. 

*Huey » 24 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm

You got me confused with somebody else.

There's only one Keystrokes Too Far, Keystrokes Too Far.

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 12:24 pm

There's only one Keystrokes Too Far, Keystrokes Too Far.

If you could explain why I am oblige to answer the same question every time you ask it, and I gave you the math to back it up, I will play.  Until then, go with on a weekly basis less than an hour a day.    

*Huey » 24 Jun 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 12:28 pm

If you could explain why I am oblige to answer the same question every time you ask it, and I gave you the math to back it up, I will play.  Until then, go with on a weekly basis less than an hour a day.  

So you acknowledge that you are, indeed, Keystrokes Too Far.

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 7:17 am

Show me.

Why do you do this ******* ****?

Seriously...

Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
15 minutes ago
What are the odds that Republican administrations would randomly nominate 6 consecutive anti abortion catholics to the Supreme court...?

HEY BV.... Post your compound probability  equation and all of your computations....Mensa Boy...!!!    
Why are you stalling...?
Could it be because you never  did a study that lists all of the independent factors along with their independent probabilities and then combine the independently weighted probabilities into a compounded result...?
For this you need to know
The percentage of Republican Admins that are anti abortion.....[read and weep].....https://www.npr.org/2018/12/04/67339802 ... n-abortion
How many qualified Scotus Nominees [of all faiths] do you have in your entire Scotus Nominee pool [in the entire USA]...?
How many Nominees are Anti Abortion Catholic ...?
It's obvious that you lack the intelligence, the integrity [honesty] and the education to be at least this far along with this make believe study of your's   that you claim to have all the data available to resolve..!!!
Yeah, you **** up big time with your DAILY BLUFF.... YOU  LIBTARDED POS

Compound Probability = What you want to know divided by all possibilities
this result forms a sub set that can be "weighted" against other related subsets [like Black vs White crime per capita] that are expressed in "Odds Maker / Likely hood" format.



 

GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Jun 2024, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 12:42 pm

Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
15 minutes ago
What are the odds that Republican administrations would randomly nominate 6 consecutive anti abortion catholics to the Supreme court...?

HEY BV.... Post your compound probability  equation and all of your computations....Mensa Boy...!!!    
Why are you stalling...?
Could it be because you never  did a study that lists all of the independent factors along with their independent probabilities and then combine the independently weighted probabilities into a compounded result...?
For this you need to know
The percentage of Republican Admins that are anti abortion.....[read and weep].....https://www.npr.org/2018/12/04/67339802 ... n-abortion
How many qualified Scotus Nominees [of all faiths] do you have in your entire Scotus Nominee pool [in the entire USA]...?
How many Nominees are Anti Abortion Catholic ...?
It's obvious that you lack the intelligence, the integrity [honesty] and the education to be at least this far along with this make believe study of your's   that you claim to have all the data available to resolve..!!!
Yeah, you **** up big time with your DAILY BLUFF.... YOU  LIBTARDED POS

Compound Probability = What you want to know divided by all possibilities
this result forms a sub set that can be "weighted" against other related subsets [like Black vs White crime per capita] that are expressed in "Odds Maker / Likely hood" format.

Could it be because you never  did a study that lists all of the independent factors along with their independent probabilities and then combine the independently weighted probabilities into a compounded result...?

This is exactly where yours was heading.

Think about how dependent it is on location.

There is no reason to assume qualified candidates aren't evenly distributed across demographics.

If you insist, you'd have to explain why there aren't 5 jews on SCOTUS.

Black Vegetable    15 minutes ago
What are the odds that Republican administrations would randomly nominate 6 consecutive anti abortion catholics to the Supreme court...?

HEY BV.... Post your compound probability  equation and all of your computations....Mensa Boy...!!!    
Why are you stalling...?
Could it be because you never  did a study that lists all of the independent factors along with their independent probabilities and then combine the independently weighted probabilities into a compounded result...?
For this you need to know
The percentage of Republican Admins that are anti abortion.....[read and weep].....https://www.npr.org/2018/12/04/67339802 ... n-abortion
How many qualified Scotus Nominees [of all faiths] do you have in your entire Scotus Nominee pool [in the entire USA]...?
How many Nominees are Anti Abortion Catholic ...?
It's obvious that you lack the intelligence, the integrity [honesty] and the education to be at least this far along with this make believe study of your's   that you claim to have all the data available to resolve..!!!
Yeah, you **** up big time with your DAILY BLUFF.... YOU  LIBTARDED POS

Compound Probability = What you want to know divided by all possibilities
this result forms a sub set / RATE that can be "weighted" against other related subset RATES [like Black vs White crime per capita] that are expressed in "Odds Maker / Likely hood" format that is easily understood, even by STEM challenged Libtards such as yourself.
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 12:48 pm

This is exactly where yours was heading.

Think about how dependent it is on location.

There is no reason to assume qualified candidates aren't evenly distributed across demographics.

If you insist, you'd have to explain why there aren't 5 jews on SCOTUS.

Black Vegetable    15 minutes ago
What are the odds that Republican administrations would randomly nominate 6 consecutive anti abortion catholics to the Supreme court...?

HEY BV.... Post your compound probability  equation and all of your computations....Mensa Boy...!!!    
Why are you stalling...?
Could it be because you never  did a study that lists all of the independent factors along with their independent probabilities and then combine the independently weighted probabilities into a compounded result...?
For this you need to know
The percentage of Republican Admins that are anti abortion.....[read and weep].....https://www.npr.org/2018/12/04/67339802 ... n-abortion
How many qualified Scotus Nominees [of all faiths] do you have in your entire Scotus Nominee pool [in the entire USA]...?
How many Nominees are Anti Abortion Catholic ...?
It's obvious that you lack the intelligence, the integrity [honesty] and the education to be at least this far along with this make believe study of your's   that you claim to have all the data available to resolve..!!!
Yeah, you **** up big time with your DAILY BLUFF.... YOU  LIBTARDED POS

Compound Probability = What you want to know divided by all possibilities
this result forms a sub set / RATE that can be "weighted" against other related subset RATES [like Black vs White crime per capita] that are expressed in "Odds Maker / Likely hood" format that is easily understood, even by STEM challenged Libtards such as yourself.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 12:36 pm

So you acknowledge that you are, indeed, Keystrokes Too Far.

You have been answered multiple time.  YOU must post why I am obliged to do so again
 

*Huey » 24 Jun 2024, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 12:58 pm

You have been answered multiple time.  YOU must post why I am obliged to do so again

YOU must

there must be some rule.

 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 1:04 pm

there must be some rule.

 

 

So there is no rule?  You don't have a rule that obliges someone to answer the same question multiple times.  I'm good,  Thanks!

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2024, 7:58 am

All you FOX rubes are too embarrassed to answer..

Not that I blame you idiots.

I’ll answer.   What’s the question?