You mean like your wishful thinking based belief that "****** are just as intelligent as the rest of mankind"...?Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 6:17 pm
Why do you insist that the things you wish were true are facts?
Post your IQ.GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Jun 2024, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑ You mean like your wishful thinking based belief that "****** are just as intelligent as the rest of mankind"...?
You mean like "being Gay is not a choice"...?
You mean like "if you are vaxxed you won't get sick or pass the virus onto anyone else"...?
You mean things like "****** aren't any more prone to committing murder, rape or infanticide than anyone else"...?
You mean like your extremely damaging photo of "Gay Trump" that the MSM hasn't discovered / used against him yet...?
You mean like your wishful thinking based belief that Trump raped Carroll in a downtown NYC dressing room...?
You can't have an honest debate with anyone on this site
Ignorance of what, Hole?BooRadley » 24 Jun 2024, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑ You can't have an honest debate with anyone on this site
You're ignorance is on display everyday.
I'm looking for a number.
you can't even solve a very simple compound probability problem...!!!Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑ I'm looking for a number.
Two digits, starting with a "3"..
I have.GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Jun 2024, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑ you can't even solve a very simple compound probability problem...!!!
Wrong.Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ I have.
I told you I would "solve" yours.
But it wasn't going to be another freebie.
So, naturally, you ran.
As you run from posting your IQ.
You're a coward.
No...we can do one together..GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Jun 2024, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑ Wrong.
You lack the intelligence to solve that compound probability problem.
Stop wasting my time with your cowardly game of Duck & Run..
You fool nobody but yourself.
Sorry Gomer, not nearly enough information.Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ No...we can do one together..
What are the odds that Republican administrations would randomly nominate 6 consecutive anti abortion catholics to the Supreme Court?
anti-abortion catholics are about 11% of the population.
What are you missing?GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Jun 2024, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑ Sorry Gomer, not nearly enough information.
But go ahead and post your equation so that the entire forum can spend the rest of the day ridiculing you for what a poorly educated, math challenged idiot you are...!!!
Post your equation and all of your computations....Mensa Boy...!!!
You're not missing anything.GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Jun 2024, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑ Post your equation and all of your computations....Mensa Boy...!!!
Post your equation and all of your computations....Mensa Boy...!!!Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ You're not missing anything.
You may assume "replacement".
Get us started.
That was a pretty pathetic effort...GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Jun 2024, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ Post your equation and all of your computations....Mensa Boy...!!!
Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ That was a pretty pathetic effort...
But I am looking for a skillful way to duck out of this inescapable hole that I've dug for myself now

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ No...we can do one together..
What are the odds that Republican administrations would randomly nominate 6 consecutive anti abortion catholics to the Supreme Court?
anti-abortion catholics are about 11% of the population.
Show me.*Huey » 24 Jun 2024, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ Probably the same as the left randomly nominating 6 consecutive pro abortion anti gun nutters in a row to the Supreme Court.
Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2024, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑ Show me.
Why do you do this ******* ****?
Seriously...