Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2024, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2024, 2:19 pm

Oh, Duck...

Show me "overturned"...

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2024, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2024, 1:49 pm

34 felony counts

More than 50 pending.

So?

*Huey » 02 Jul 2024, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 2:16 pm

So?

Felony  normalized 

*Huey » 02 Jul 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 2:00 pm

And they should receive the same penalty that the MSM received for promoting both the Pee Tape/Dossier Lie and the Fine people hoax for years.

You down with that?

Why?

Blackvegetable » 02 Jul 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 2:38 pm

Felony  normalized

Let me know when you learn what the underlying crime is.

ALl you will get from me is a "So" until you figure that out.  

Blackvegetable » 02 Jul 2024, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 2:39 pm

Why?

SOrry, got no time for your alter ego, Askholio.  To quote a somewhat wise man, no questions, cocksucker.
 

*Huey » 02 Jul 2024, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 2:43 pm

Let me know when you learn what the underlying crime is.

ALl you will get from me is a "So" until you figure that out.

haha 

BuckNaked » 02 Jul 2024, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 2:47 pm

haha

SOrry

*Huey » 02 Jul 2024, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 2:43 pm

Let me know when you learn what the underlying crime is.

ALl you will get from me is a "So" until you figure that out.

What do you want to know?

Don't be vague.

*Huey » 02 Jul 2024, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 2:44 pm

SOrry, got no time for your alter ego, Askholio.  To quote a somewhat wise man, no questions, cocksucker.

But you want me to explain "the underlying crime".

Blackvegetable » 02 Jul 2024, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 3:04 pm

But you want me to explain "the underlying crime".

You got your comments mixed up Refraemy.  The comment you replied to is not about that.

Blackvegetable » 02 Jul 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 3:03 pm

What do you want to know?

Don't be vague.

You know what I am talking about.  To get those MISDEMEANORS to the felony level they had to be in support of an underlying crime.

Just post what the underlying crime is.  You have until September when sentencing is now scheduled.

And don't forget the Clinton Campaign did the same thing with the Steele Dossier.  All they got was a FEC fine.

*Huey » 02 Jul 2024, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 3:06 pm

You got your comments mixed up Refraemy.  The comment you replied to is not about that.

Does that make it irrelevant?

Blackvegetable » 02 Jul 2024, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 3:12 pm

Does that make it irrelevant?

Get back to me when you figure out your Roulette Wheel of reframes, Askholio.

*Huey » 02 Jul 2024, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 3:14 pm

Get back to me when you figure out your Roulette Wheel of reframes, Askholio.

If you have a case to make, stop running and make it.

Blackvegetable » 02 Jul 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 3:15 pm

If you have a case to make, stop running and make it.

I'll address both discussions because at the moment you are pulling a Biden and seem to be very confused.

Fact.  The underlying crime that makes Trumps misdemeanor charges felonies has not been named.

Fact.  The MSM lied about the Fine People Hoax and the Pee Tape/Steele Dossier.  Fox should receive the same exact legal consequences for what you claim they lied about.

That was easy.

Now rant and rave those are not cases or facts.
 

*Huey » 02 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm

I'll address both discussions because at the moment you are pulling a Biden and seem to be very confused.

Fact.  The underlying crime that makes Trumps misdemeanor charges felonies has not been named yet.

Fact.  The MSM lied about the Fine People Hoax and the Pee Tape/Steele Dossier.  Fox should receive the same exact legal consequences for what you claim they lied about.

That was easy.

Now rant and rave those are not cases or facts.

Fact.  The underlying crime that makes Trumps misdemeanor charges felonies has not been named yet.

Link.

Fact.  The MSM lied about the Fine People Hoax and the Pee Tape/Steele Dossier.

****.

 Fox should receive the same exact legal consequences for what you claim they lied about.

Why?

It isn't my claim.

**** idiot.

That was easy.

Now rant and rave those are not cases or facts.

They aren't 

Blackvegetable » 02 Jul 2024, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 3:23 pm

Link.

****.

Why?

It isn't my claim.

**** idiot.

That was easy.

They aren't

Germain said he wondered whether the statute of limitations might apply to the underlying – and uncharged – crimes that made falsifying business records a felony.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/fac ... 983592007/#

What is that crime?  

Charlottesville hoax real?! Fact-Checker finds Trump Didn't call neo-Nazis 'fine people'Rising 
/ June 24, 2024 / 9:35 AM PDT

Jessica Burbank and Robby Soave react to Snopes fact-check that shows Donald Trump didn't say neo-Nazis are "fine people" in the 2017 Charlottesville "Unite The Right Rally."

https://thehill.com/video/charlottesvil ... e/9810879/

No, Trump Did Not Call Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists 'Very Fine People'Trump's remarks about the deadly Charlottesville "Unite the Right" rally in 2017 remain controversial.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump ... ne-people/
 
Askholio, what do you got besides questions and cheap insults that make me laugh?

BV, since you do not appear to be very informed I want you to have this one as well:

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukrai ... 9260b13e93

NEW YORK (AP) — Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee have agreed to pay $113,000 to settle a Federal Election Commission investigation into whether they violated campaign finance law by misreporting spending on research that eventually became the infamous Steele dossier.

The Clinton campaign hired Perkins Coie, which then hired Fusion GPS, a research and intelligence firm, to conduct opposition research on Republican candidate Donald Trump’s ties to Russia. But on FEC forms, the Clinton campaign classified the spending as legal services.

“By intentionally obscuring their payments through Perkins Coie and failing to publicly disclose the true purpose of those payments,” the campaign and DNC “were able to avoid publicly reporting on their statutorily required FEC disclosure forms the fact that they were paying Fusion GPS to perform opposition research on Trump with the intent of influencing the outcome of the 2016 presidential election,” the initial complaint had read.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Jul 2024, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2024, 3:23 pm

Link.

****.

Why?

It isn't my claim.

**** idiot.

That was easy.

They aren't

Did you see that the guy appears to be a Democrat??