Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Don the Big Spender!
Don the Big Spender!
By maineman
25 Jun 2024 2:39 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
26 Jun 2024 5:43 am
ConsRule » 25 Jun 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Both parties spend way too much money...a pox on both houses.
However, from your link;
The two parties add to the debt in different ways, with Republicans doing it mostly through bipartisan legislation and Democrats doing it more through executive actions, the CRFB says in a preview of future work.
No, they don't.Both parties spend way too much money...a pox on both houses.
You're lying.
It's what you tell yourself to rationalize voting for a rapist and felon.
26 Jun 2024 5:54 am
Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2024, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑ No, they don't.
You're lying.
It's what you tell yourself to rationalize voting for a rapist and felon.
**** you... you POS pedo
26 Jun 2024 6:22 am
fath·ommaineman » 25 Jun 2024, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑ you'll have to explain to me sometime how someone fathoms themselves.
verb
- 1.
understand (a difficult problem or an enigmatic person) after much thought.
"he couldn't fathom why she was being so anxious"
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
26 Jun 2024 6:28 am
These idiots don't do numbers...maineman » 25 Jun 2024, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ oops!
https://thehill.com/business/4736740-tr ... y-deficit/
"The fiscal policies of the Trump administration added twice the amount to the national deficit as have President Biden's a new analysis has found."
Go figure. I guess all those bankruptcies really WERE a good indication of what kind of a fiscal genius the clown really was!
They just spread the blame equally.
It's what makes them so Usefool.
26 Jun 2024 7:12 am
First, I stated my opinion...by definition it cannot be a lie.
Second, since you don't think both parties spent too much, the budgeted revenue of the federal government for the current fiscal year is $3.29 trillion...in your opinion, how much should Congress spend this fiscal year?
26 Jun 2024 7:19 am
ConsRule » 26 Jun 2024, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑ First, I stated my opinion...by definition it cannot be a lie.
Second, since you don't think both parties spent too much, the budgeted revenue of the federal government for the current fiscal year is $3.29 trillion...in your opinion, how much should Congress spend this fiscal year?
ok...so it is comically and transparently wrong....ignorant.First, I stated my opinion...by definition it cannot be a lie.
Better?
Nice try.Second, since you don't think both parties spent too much,
I said your assertion/opinion is a pile of ignorant crap.
26 Jun 2024 7:20 am
An opinion...by definition...cannot be wrong. You may not agree with it, but that's your **** problem.Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2024, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ ok...so it is comically and transparently wrong....ignorant.
You didn't answer the question. Be an adult, go on the record with your opinion.
26 Jun 2024 7:30 am
Your question was entirely irrelevant.ConsRule » 26 Jun 2024, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ An opinion...by definition...cannot be wrong. You may not agree with it, but that's your **** problem.
You didn't answer the question. Be an adult, go on the record with your opinion.
You know your rule.
26 Jun 2024 7:37 am
It is completely relevant. It goes directly to your assertion that they don't spend too much.
However, I understand you too big a coward to go on record.
Carry on...or whine about something.
26 Jun 2024 7:40 am
It was entirely irrelevant.ConsRule » 26 Jun 2024, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ It is completely relevant. It goes directly to your assertion that they don't spend too much.
However, I understand you too big a coward to go on record.
Carry on...or whine about something.
An assertion I didn't make.It goes directly to your assertion that they don't spend too much.
We'll see cowardice when I ask the RELEVANT question.However, I understand you too big a coward to go on record
Do you doubt it?
26 Jun 2024 7:43 am
ROG62 » 25 Jun 2024, 8:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Funnily, the prez doesn't set fiscal policy and the democrats forced his hand spending trillions and trillions during covid...
dems spent during covid? I guess I forgot how many vetoes the dems overrode during that period.
26 Jun 2024 7:52 am
**** source, please?righteous » 25 Jun 2024, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Biden left out that the debt under his watch is on pace to exceed Trump’s one-term debt accumulation by the end of his current term, Jan. 20, 2025. During his first three years, Biden already accumulated $6.32 trillion in debt. For his final year, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has projected a deficit of $1.582 trillion. Add those two figures together and you get $7.902 trillion as Biden’s four-year total.Treasury Department data shows the gross federal debt rose by about $7.8 trillion on Trump’s watch.
26 Jun 2024 7:56 am
26 Jun 2024 7:59 am
Yes.
They don't.
Since 1980 ONE party has demonstrated a gift for profligacy...
It isn't the Democrats.
It's evident in the numbers.
As you've demonstrated, you're only marginally less innumerate than @*HoooooeyVagina and @Vegas
26 Jun 2024 8:10 am
Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2024, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑ Yes.
They don't.
Since 1980 ONE party has demonstrated a gift for profligacy...
It isn't the Democrats.
It's evident in the numbers.
As you've demonstrated, you're only marginally less innumerate than @*HoooooeyVagina and @Vegas
You still haven't answered the question.
26 Jun 2024 8:22 am
Your rule.
Do you want to see how ignorant your opinion is, or not?
26 Jun 2024 8:24 am
I seem to recall when I would criticize the COVID stimulus packages signed by Trump YOU supported them and criticized me.Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2024, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑ Yes.
They don't.
Since 1980 ONE party has demonstrated a gift for profligacy...
It isn't the Democrats.
It's evident in the numbers.
As you've demonstrated, you're only marginally less innumerate than @*HoooooeyVagina and @Vegas
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
26 Jun 2024 8:27 am
This jackass accepts any numbers fed him, uncritically. It's what makes him a Usefool.Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2024, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑ These idiots don't do numbers...
They just spread the blame equally.
It's what makes them so Usefool.
1 penis plus 2 gonads multiplied by retardation equals a broad.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Jun 2024 8:27 am
Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ Your rule.
Do you want to see how ignorant your opinion is, or not?
No question until you answer mine.
26 Jun 2024 8:27 am
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2024, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ ok...so it is comically and transparently wrong....ignorant.
Better?
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 5928 users online :: 1 registered, 11 bots, and 5916 guests
Registered users: Johnny You
Bots: MicroMessenger, proximic, CriteoBot, YandexBot, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, Googlebot, curl/7, facebookexternalhit, bingbot