I'm addressing your demand, not mine.
I'm not really making a demand. You claim it is ****. Yet, you can't explain why.Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ I'm addressing your demand, not mine.
And you're gonna contribute more than "shrug"
It's obvious from the roster of people involved.*Huey » 28 Jun 2024, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not really making a demand. You claim it is ****. Yet, you can't explain why.
Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ It's obvious from the roster of people involved.
Post the list of states.
Just post them.*Huey » 28 Jun 2024, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ If you click tis links you would not have to ask such a stupid question. You had been given the answer before. If you are too lazy to click a link I don't have time for your ignorance.
Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ Just post them.
If you continue to decline, we will assume that it is because you know it will make my case...
It's not like that.*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It is already posted. If you can't click a link you are not intelligent enough to discuss the issue. In the future my first question to you will be did you read the the information provided.
Now pass the salt.
Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ It's not like that.
You can play stupid solo.
I accept your concession.
You demanded an explanation of the obvious for reasons you cannot articulate.*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I'm good. I did not make a statement that I can't support. That's all you, Runny PK.
Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ You demanded an explanation of the obvious for reasons you cannot articulate.
SS, DD.
Now list the 5 states.*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No, I can read and process the information posted. I counted 5 with lawsuits. Obviously math and reading are not your bag.
Now, pass the butter. I accept your surrender.
You listed 2.*Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ here are three more in the mix, besides Texas and Kansas, according to RFK Jr.:
https://myind.net/Home/viewArticle/five ... kennedy-jr
From the OP. Click the link. They are listed. You may have the last word.
S. Get back to me when you click the lin. None of that makes it ****.Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ You listed 2.
The AG of one of which has been under indictment his entire two terms, and was impeached by his own state legislature....his wife, on whom this Fetus fetishist had been cheating (with the wife of a staffer) was a member and didn’t recuse herself for the vote...he also filed suit against another state for failing to vote for Grifty....SCOTUS taintpunted it.
The other is a reliable flunky who headed yet another GOP effort to discredit our voting system. He was laughed out of court.
Would you like to keep going?
And if a cuck had balls he would not use his daughter as a human shield.
He probably wouldn't have a daughter....Cannonpointer » 28 Jun 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ And if a cuck had balls he would not use his daughter as a human shield.
*Huey » 28 Jun 2024, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ S. Get back to me when you click the lin. None of that makes it ****.
here are three more in the mix, besides Texas and Kansas, according to RFK Jr.:
https://myind.net/Home/viewArticle/five ... kennedy-jr
R.F.K. Jr. Says Doctors Found a Dead Worm in His BrainNone of that makes it ****.
here are three more in the mix, besides Texas and Kansas, according to RFK Jr.:
You mean your just lying on the internet?
Does an attack on RFK make the law suits again pfizer og away, lab rat?Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑
R.F.K. Jr. Says Doctors Found a Dead Worm in His Brain
I can remember when people had a right to a speedy trial.Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑
The AG of one of which has been under indictment his entire two terms,