Liberal Forum

*Huey » 28 Jun 2024, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 3:26 pm

You didn't watch it?  Ok, you are in no position to discuss it.

You have no need to argue with me.  You need to be arguing with your party.

President Joe Biden's performance in the first debate Thursday has sparked a new round of criticism from Democrats, as well as public and private musing about whether he should remain at the top of the ticket.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-e ... 4'Babbling' and 'hoarse': Biden's debate performance sends Democrats into a panic The president often had a weak, raspy voice during his first debate against Trump in what Democrats had hoped would be a turning point in the race.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-e ... rcna157279

You didn't watch it?  Ok, you are in no position to discuss it.

Never stopped you from talking about the Jan 6th commission.

But I'm talking about response to it.

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 3:44 pm

Never stopped you from talking about the Jan 6th commission.

But I'm talking about response to it.

I at least saw some of it.  Oh, by the way, did you see the USSC hearing concerning the Jan 6th obstruction charges?  You ought to.  

*Huey » 28 Jun 2024, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 3:45 pm

I at least saw some of it.  Oh, by the way, did you see the USSC hearing concerning the Jan 6th obstruction charges?  You ought to.

Clips on The Five.

*Huey » 28 Jun 2024, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 3:45 pm

I at least saw some of it.  Oh, by the way, did you see the USSC hearing concerning the Jan 6th obstruction charges?  You ought to.

what’s the significance?

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 3:46 pm

Clips on The Five.

Nope.  You may stop lying at anytime, Reframey.

So, are you still voting for Biden?  Come on, be a man, Toady.

Biden is the President?....no he's not....he's a gold fish...America has been lied to once again by the Leftist Progressives...America has been knowingly run by an unelected President or group of people that are not elected.

BuckNaked » 28 Jun 2024, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 3:49 pm

what’s the significance?

There is a thread on it I started earlier.  

The justices in a 6-3 vote on nonideological lines handed a win to defendant Joseph Fischer, who is among hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants — including former President Donald Trump — who have been charged with obstructing an official proceeding over the effort to prevent Congress' certification of President Joe Biden’s election victory. 

 The court concluded that the law, enacted in 2002 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act after the Enron accounting scandal, was only intended to apply to more limited circumstances involving forms of evidence tampering, not the much broader array of situations that prosecutors had claimed it covered.

The provision targets anyone who "obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so," but the court determined that its scope is limited by a preceding sentence in the statute referring to altering or destroying records.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... rcna155902

Case may have to be reheard.
 

*Huey » 28 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm

There is a thread on it I started earlier.  

The justices in a 6-3 vote on nonideological lines handed a win to defendant Joseph Fischer, who is among hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants — including former President Donald Trump — who have been charged with obstructing an official proceeding over the effort to prevent Congress' certification of President Joe Biden’s election victory. 

 The court concluded that the law, enacted in 2002 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act after the Enron accounting scandal, was only intended to apply to more limited circumstances involving forms of evidence tampering, not the much broader array of situations that prosecutors had claimed it covered.

The provision targets anyone who "obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so," but the court determined that its scope is limited by a preceding sentence in the statute referring to altering or destroying records.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... rcna155902

Case may have to be reheard.

uh?   Try them for destruction of federal property if they did it.   If they attacked federal employees try them for assault 

*Huey » 28 Jun 2024, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 3:50 pm

Nope.  You may stop lying at anytime, Reframey.

So, are you still voting for Biden?  Come on, be a man, Toady.

Describe what part you saw live, Runny.

Yes, of course.
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 4:02 pm

Describe what part you saw live, Runny.

Yes, of course.

SOrry, this thread is about Biden's performance during the debate.  You didn't see it.  If you wish to discuss the Jan 6th committee you can either start a thread or dig up my comments that I have already posted.  If you are unwilling to discuss Biden don't bother me with your loinfo diversions and reframes.

*Huey » 28 Jun 2024, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 4:04 pm

SOrry, this thread is about Biden's performance during the debate.  You didn't see it.  If you wish to discuss the Jan 6th committee you can either start a thread or dig up my comments that I have already posted.  If you are unwilling to discuss Biden don't bother me with your loinfo diversions and reframes.

You went on a tangent about lying.
 

Zeets2 » 28 Jun 2024, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 8:52 am

Kamala knows that the only way she'll get the nomination is if Joe croaks before election day.
Of course if that happens, Hillary will likely suicide her before that!

 

BuckNaked » 28 Jun 2024, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 10:11 am

I was waiting for him to just walk off and not return

 

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 2:43 pm

2ndBesty?

Nothing ambiguous about that...

Didn't watch it.....but again I note that you demand respect for your party line....while you couldn’t muster **** over 34 felonies.

#19?

A no brainer.

What I find "scary" is a rapist grifter leading a ticket

BuckNaked » 28 Jun 2024, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 3:42 pm

Plugs is fired up at rally today has his voice back wow quick recovery

Albeit late, apparently the drugs have kicked in...
 

ROG62 » 28 Jun 2024, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 5:33 pm

Struggle to be less Insipid
 

Joe

RebelGator » 27 Jun 2024, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2024, 9:45 pm

Joe made it thru the debate without croaking......somehow.

Are you sure?

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 2:23 pm

Because my focus is on measurable performance?

Well, we've already shown Biden has no record on which he can run.

 

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2024, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 6:03 pm

Struggle to be less Insipid

Strive to discard the binky...