Liberal Forum

GHETTOBLASTER » 01 Jul 2024, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 10:03 am

You forgot to mention that your scholarly explanation was taken verbatim from Investopedia       
The "chasm" between us is this.... I have too much integrity to be a plagiarist.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fo ... ntract.asp

Google "verbatim"

Then "FINRA Series 79"

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 10:06 am

Google "verbatim"

Then "FINRA Series 79"

You forgot to mention that your scholarly explanation was taken verbatim from Investopedia       
The "chasm" between us is this.... I have too much integrity to be a plagiarist.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fo ... ntract.asp
 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 01 Jul 2024, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 10:07 am

You forgot to mention that your scholarly explanation was taken verbatim from Investopedia       
The "chasm" between us is this.... I have too much integrity to be a plagiarist.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fo ... ntract.asp

You should feel VERY inadequate  right now...

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 10:08 am

You should feel VERY inadequate  right now...

You forgot to mention that your scholarly explanation was taken verbatim from Investopedia       
The "chasm" between us is this.... I have too much integrity to be a plagiarist.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fo ... ntract.asp
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 10:05 am

Look at this, Syphilitic Cumbucket...

And did I get as much as a "Thank you, Demigod. Let me bathe your feet in my tears."

**** peasant.

Yo, @Vegas

Back to stalking again, I see. 

Vegas » 01 Jul 2024, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 11:38 am

Back to stalking again, I see.

My definition is so scholarly that
@GHETTO BLASTER  is convinced I lifted it.

That should give you a sense of how small you are.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 11:45 am

My definition is so scholarly that
@GHETTO BLASTER  is convinced I lifted it.

That should give you a sense of how small you are.

No. It wasn't scholarly Mr. Narcissists. It was one vague useless piece of ****. 

You still don't know what survivorship bias is. 

Vegas » 01 Jul 2024, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 11:47 am

No. It wasn't scholarly Mr. Narcissists. It was one vague useless piece of ****. 

You still don't know what survivorship bias is.

A blind test says otherwise.

You still don't know what survivorship bias is.

we have no reason to believe you do.

You can't even come up with an example.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 2:09 pm

A blind test says otherwise.


we have no reason to believe you do.

You can't even come up with an example.

Your use of we instead of I "....says otherwise..." explains everything after you single out your opposition as a he or she individual. Psychological class warfare tactics from ancient mentality working current events.

vocabulary, grammar, mathematics insulates and isolates eternally separated results into compartmentalized facts suggesting anything else was possible before, during, after one exists since conceived.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 2:09 pm

You can't even come up with an example.

You know the rule. 

Now do it. Nothing is free punk. If you want something from me, then you need to give me something. 

Vegas » 01 Jul 2024, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 2:16 pm

You know the rule. 

Now do it. Nothing is free punk. If you want something from me, then you need to give me something. 

Understanding evolving in plain sight is free until you promise to obey reality cradle to grave. Change your mind is a crime against humanity. always be prepared to be charged socially with insubordination, treason, blasphemy when you get back to navigating time uniquely alive each rotation since conceived to replace the 30 specific relatives supplied 93.75% your unique chromosomes in every fiber of your sole existence today lived or living as your 16 great great grandparents, 8 great grandparents, 4 grandparents, 2 parenting your into what you became after birth serving social justifications cradle to grave.

Obviously you aren't dead yet.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2024, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2024, 3:53 pm

Contracts have parties and counterparties....you, and the other guy.

Forward contracts are negotiated directly between two parties, and can be tailored to the specific needs of each.

Futures contracts are standardized with respect to terms (usually period and price). This makes them more liquid, with parties willing to take either side. They are sold on exchanges which provide "open interest" - an indicator of supply - a clearing mechanism for trades, and regulate the behavior of its participants.  

One of the regulatory schemes relates to counterparty integrity...the assurance that the counterparty will make good on settlement.

Like when the Randolph and Mortimer Duke lost their seat on the exchange?

Cannonpointer » 01 Jul 2024, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 2:21 pm

Like when the Randolph and Mortimer Duke lost their seat on the exchange?

Exchanges are voluntary associations, but they do have rules.

Cannonpointer » 01 Jul 2024, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 2:21 pm

Like when the Randolph and Mortimer Duke lost their seat on the exchange? :)

vs Dan Aykroyd(Winthorp) and Eddie Murphy(Billy Ray) being the social lab rats. Are those two characters you and sumela?

Vegas » 01 Jul 2024, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 2:16 pm

You know the rule. 

Now do it. Nothing is free punk. If you want something from me, then you need to give me something.

Yea...I told you you were wrong and gave you a correct definition.

Because I can.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 2:25 pm

Yea...I told you you were wrong and gave you a correct definition.

Because I can.

Yea, I proved that you were wrong, because you were. 

And no, I am not going to repost it all. **** your dementia. Not my problem. 

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 2:25 pm

Yea...I told you you were wrong and gave you a correct definition.

Because I can.
 

Factual interpretations used over and over really won't define evolving only happening one time events in chain reaction of compounding combinations forward now.

GHETTOBLASTER » 01 Jul 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 9:52 am

You forgot to mention that your scholarly explanation was taken verbatim from Investopedia      

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fo ... ntract.asp

Democrats are allowed to plagiarize - he was just having a pedo-joe moment. 

Beakman » 28 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm

Hammer meets nail! :(   :(   :(  
 

does your mind ever consider your brain to be an anvil everyone saving humanity pounds on between a hammer and tomorrow's outcomes arriving today.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2024, 2:23 pm

Exchanges are voluntary associations, but they do have rules.

C'mon, man! I got hairy legs.

The Randolph and Mortimer Duke reference was an excellent reference.
'
It certainly deserved more than THAT can of cold cream of chicken.