Liberal Forum

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 3:14 pm

Is the asswipe in prison or no?
 

I have no idea - I'm not witch-hunting the victim of torture, you pig worshiping queer.   

WTF is your problem, shorty? I show you a cop TORTURING a citizen, and you DEFEND that, looking for any reason you can find to attack the victim? You're a **** loser, bro. A cop licking loser. You need to boy up. 

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 3:17 pm

I have no idea - I'm not witch-hunting the victim of torture, you pig worshiping queer.   

WTF is your problem, shorty? I show you a cop TORTURING a citizen, and you DEFEND that, looking for any reason you can find to attack the victim? You're a **** loser, bro. A cop licking loser. You need to boy up.

Perhaps you should have watched the whole clip you posted.

I did... and my opinion is still the same.

The blond in the red dress at the beginning is stunning I might add.


 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 3:18 pm

Perhaps you should have watched the whole clip you posted.
 

What mitigating information did your watch of "the whole clip" render, taint licker?

You have already insisted that electric shocks to the nut sac are not torture.

Did you learn some OTHER ***? Your implication that you know more about this case than I do - even if it were true, and it is the opposite of true - would not legitimize your CRAVEN insistence that tazing a ball sac deliberately is justifiable police activity, you weak little cop-swooning girl.

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 3:22 pm

What mitigating information did your watch of "the whole clip" render, taint licker?

You have already insisted that electric shocks to the nut sac are not torture.

Did you learn some OTHER ***? Your implication that you know more about this case than I do - even if it were true, and it is the opposite of true - would not legitimize your CRAVEN insistence that tazing a ball sac deliberately is justifiable police activity, you weak little cop-swooning girl.

I gleaned that the guy was a piece of trash that probably shouldn't have been on the streets in the first place...

You would rather him to be free to prey on society like a good little proggy leftist. Soros loves useful idiots like you.

 
​​​​​




 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm

I gleaned that the guy was a piece of trash that probably shouldn't have been on the streets in the first place...

Listen closely, jackass. The fact that he is white trash is evidence without volume. All you need is eyes.

That does not justify torture. In fact, that does not justify ANY violation of his civil rights. We hire cops to PROTECT rights - not violate them. What you want to do for police on their time off is between you, them, and the public health department.

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 3:39 pm

Listen closely, jackass. The fact that he is white trash is evidence without volume. All you need is eyes.

That does not justify torture. In fact, that does not justify ANY violation of his civil rights. We hire cops to PROTECT rights - not violate them. What you want to do for police on their time off is between you, them, and the public health department.

I just said trash... you went all racist and said "white" trash.

You need to be cancelled.
 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 3:42 pm

I just said trash... you went all racist and said "white" trash.

You need to be cancelled.

Well, they are white trash. If they were any OTHER race, they'd be a *** or a cholo or what have you. 

But I also expect the worst ghetto ***'s rights to be respected and upheld by cops - ON ACCOUNT OF THAT BEING THEIR **** JOB. 

And also on account of I am smart enough to know that what they can do to one American they can do to all Americans.
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 3:48 pm

Well, they are white trash. If they were any OTHER race, they'd be a *** or a cholo or what have you. 

But I also expect the worst ghetto ***'s rights to be respected and upheld by cops - ON ACCOUNT OF THAT BEING THEIR **** JOB. 

And also on account of I am smart enough to know that what they can do to one American they can do to all Americans.

Of course they can.

The key is to not give them any reason to. If I hit a DUI checkpoint and the cop wants to see my ID, registration, and proof of insurance, then I provide them and say "have a nice day" and be on my way. It has never NOT gone that way.

It's not difficult, since I don't drink and drive and follow the laws of my State.

I could see you telling him to go **** himself and that you don't have to provide him with ****, and then end up crying when he drags you out of the car and tazes you in the nuts.



We are a Nation of laws, because anarchy isn't that pleasant for women, children, the elderly, and the infirmed. In an anarchist State, only the criminal element and unscrupulous thrive, and you are supporting that under the guise of muh rights!

Are there bad cops that abuse their power? Of course there are. Always have been and always will be. Tearing down society by yhe elimination of the police force isn't a solution, but it sure as hell seems to be what you and your boyfriend Smello are advocating. I'm thinking it's because it will serve to hasten the demise of this Country, but that just me.

You sound just like the bleeding heart progressive leftists that were clamoring to defund the police back a couple of years ago, and just like BLM. Both entities have never met a criminal they didn't adore either. 

Sorry, but I'll put up with continuing to weed out the bad apples and keeping the cops right where they are, doing what they are doing, thank you very much.

I know quite a few cops in my town, and they are great guys and gals that serve the community well and without prejudice. You would hate them just because they wear a badge and uniform and do a job that very few want to do. 

Like I said earlier, you started this thread crying about a cop that didn't do anything when he should have, and are now crying about a cop that did something when you think he shouldn't have.

There is simply no pleasing you whiny assed progressive leftists I suppose. You're just gonna bitch period.
 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm

Of course they can.

The key is to not give them any reason to. If I hit a DUI checkpoint and the cop wants to see my ID, registration, and proof of insurance, then I provide them and say "have a nice day" and be on my way. It has never NOT gone that way.

It's not difficult, since I don't drink and drive and follow the laws of my State.

That is precisely how I behave - and with identical results. But I stand for the rights of those who insist on their rights being respected, and between the two of us, I am the only one who has never defended torture like a giggling little bitch.

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm

I could see you telling him to go **** himself and that you don't have to provide him with ****, and then end up crying when he drags you out of the car and tazes you in the nuts.

Keep seeing that, sparky. I am not the droid they're looking for.

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm

We are a Nation of laws,

Why are you making MY point, jaggov?

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm

because anarchy isn't that pleasant for women, children, the elderly, and the infirmed. In an anarchist State, only the criminal element and unscrupulous thrive, and you are supporting that under the guise of muh rights!

Yeah, no, fruitcake.

I expect police to follow the law. You mealy-mouth for them when they break it, because you're a blue line dick sucker.

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm

Are there bad cops that abuse their power? Of course there are. Always have been and always will be.

And servile punks will always defend them.

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm

Tearing down society by yhe elimination of the police force isn't a solution,

Who said it was, fruitcake? The only one who has suggested anarchy is you. I suggested that we hold police to account - to GREATER account, as they are the ones enforcing the laws and so they must be the purest in FOLLOWING the laws the take a check to enforce. And a fine check it is - more than a couple of millions before retirement and more than a couple after, with only 20 years of work to earn that retirement and a high school diploma being the only requirement.

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm

but it sure as hell seems to be what you and your boyfriend Smello are advocating. I'm thinking it's because it will serve to hasten the demise of this Country, but that just me.

That's because you're a midwit hack who thinks it has to be a fascist police state or anarchy and there is no middle ground. You'd have **** on the founders of this nation.

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 4:58 pm

You sound just like the bleeding heart progressive leftists that were clamoring to defund the police back a couple of years ago, and just like BLM.

To you - but you're stupid. How stupid? SO stupid that you're on record SCOFFING at the idea that tasing a man's ball sac is torture - you weak **** skifooza.
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 2:12 pm

Son, you called the living **** out of this one. 

I have one of the frank burns pussies arguing that TASING A MAN'S NUT SAC REPEATEDLY is not torture. 

I **** you not - you can probably guess which ***.

Gotta be RipCHENEY.  The """"libertarian"""".  

The tard never sniffed anything remotely ''libertarian''.

Sir, I know Ron Paul....you are no Ron Paul...  
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 2:11 pm

Careful.

Rippy's on the taintpath.

The old guy worships BIG GOVT

as long as its the ones with the SOCIALIST power, authority, guns, and fists.

God forbid it be the BIG GOVT SOCIALISM that spends on the people.  
 

Sumela » 30 Jun 2024, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 8:24 pm

Gotta be RipCHENEY.  The """"libertarian"""".  

The tard never sniffed anything remotely ''libertarian''.

Sir, I know Ron Paul....you are no Ron Paul...

CP's been looking for you to show up and suckle his sack all afternoon Smello.

What's been keeping ya?

I think his sack has some fresh taser burns that need tending to.

 
 
 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 8:31 pm

CP's been looking for you to show up and suckle his sack all afternoon Smello.

What's been keeping ya?

I think his sack has some fresh taser burns that need tending to.

Shhhh, lil Cheney.  Its yer bedtime old man.  Yer confusion requires lots of sleep  
 

Sumela » 30 Jun 2024, 8:34 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 8:34 pm

Shhhh, lil Cheney.  Its yer bedtime old man.  Yer confusion requires lots of sleep

Don't worry Smello... your boyfriend has been defending your honor all day, no matter how unhinged it made him look.

It upset him terribly to see you crying like that last night.

 

 
 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 8:31 pm

CP's been looking for you to show up and suckle his sack all afternoon Smello.

What's been keeping ya?

I think his sack has some fresh taser burns that need tending to.

 
 
 

 

What's it like to be ON RECORD scoffing at the prospect that tasing a man's ball sac is torture, you little frank burns sissy panty?
 

Cannonpointer » 28 Jun 2024, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 3:17 pm

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fo ... rcna134848

As long as they hold the right people responsible- the people in charge. Don't paint all officers with the same brush. If an officer disobeyed a direct order not to intervene, he would be terminated. Odds are, he has a family to support. Having said that, it would be difficult not to disobey orders when children are involved. But I've heard firsthand stories of orders not to save fellow officers during prison riots. They ended up dying.

Cannonpointer » 09 Jul 2024, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 8:46 pm

What's it like to be ON RECORD scoffing at the prospect that tasing a man's ball sac is torture, you little frank burns sissy panty?

This guy is your hero, isn't he.

1st Amendment "auditor" extraordinare...

https://i.postimg.cc/tJQ5SVff/th.jpg


https://www.click2houston.com/news/loca ... -child-da/


 

Punch » 09 Jul 2024, 11:15 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 11:15 pm

As long as they hold the right people responsible- the people in charge. Don't paint all officers with the same brush. If an officer disobeyed a direct order not to intervene, he would be terminated. Odds are, he has a family to support. Having said that, it would be difficult not to disobey orders when children are involved. But I've heard firsthand stories of orders not to save fellow officers during prison riots. They ended up dying.

When you say "hold responsible," that sounds like a legal phrase. 

When it comes to identifying cowards, I will default to my own judgment, which is shaped by what I would loosely refer to as a Renaissance education - but which is ultimately, I believe, DNA inspired and derived. 
 

*rippy38 » 10 Jul 2024, 4:53 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 4:53 am

This guy is your hero, isn't he.

1st Amendment "auditor" extraordinare...

https://i.postimg.cc/tJQ5SVff/th.jpg

https://www.click2houston.com/news/loca ... -child-da/

First, let me say that I am gratified to see the direction of your investigations. I can only hope that you will end up looking at the courageous and patriotic auditing community with an open mind, and not merely searching, as you did here, for "bad apples" - of which there are a goodly number. The temptation to grow a channel through click bait is greater than the character of many of the people who get into auditing. For a couple of the very good ones, I would recommend Audit the Audit, and Long Island Accountability. 

There are scores of excellent auditors out there, to many of whom I am subscribed. But the two I mention above are cream of the crop. Audit the Audit has a companion channel called Lackluster - it is also quite good. These channels show extremely decent, law abiding citizens standing up for our rights and using the court system to get justice when police overstep their law enforcement powers to become feelings enforcers or ego enforcers. This is something you will naturally applaud, if you care about freedom and liberty and are not a boot-licking, statist chump. 

Finally, I am quite familiar with the work of the auditor you sought out. He has done some rather solid, B to B+ level work as an auditor. I give him high marks for his reasonable demeanor and commitment to dignified auditing - as opposed to seeking out click bait situations through lawful-but-awful behaviors intended to annoy ordinary citizens instead of testing the training and oath-fidelity of public officials. It would certainly appear that moral and sexual dysfunction got the better of him in his personal life. I have an open mind about it, because I know how dirty the State can get when someone pisses off powerful people. But my general sense is, he committed the crime he is convicted of. This in no way diminishes the body of work he compiled when he was an auditor, any more than a bridge is made less by its builder's later bad behaviors, or the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel is diminished by Michelangelo's sexual peccadillos.

I will share a clip from Audit the Audit in which the police behaved in a most stellar fashion, real old-school, professional, non ego-driven policing - notwithstanding the newby auditor was a bit of a weakling and they COULD have easily played her out of pocket if they had been so inclined. Something very good is happening in that Tennessee county, and I have been in touch with officials there to express my gratitude and admiration for the Sheriff Department's excellent standards as exemplified by the officers in the video. I have spoken to their PIO and to their dispatch, and I am instructed that the officers have received my praise and the praise of hundreds of others who support the auditing community. I don't just bitch about bad policing - I do what I can to encourage good policing, and I support certain high quality channels monetarily. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOudePvjlgI

 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 10 Jul 2024, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 10:18 am

When you say "hold responsible," that sounds like a legal phrase. 

When it comes to identifying cowards, I will default to my own judgment, which is shaped by what I would loosely refer to as a Renaissance education - but which is ultimately, I believe, DNA inspired and derived.

Taking care of your own family is also hard-wired in our DNA. But I largely agree with you. I wouldn't have waited around and let kids get killed. That would haunt me for the rest of my life.